Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

I'm obviously +1. Looking for more votes. On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote: +1 Oliver Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell: Context:  Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback. There aren't any major API changes

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

The site can get changed separately from the release, so not a blocker but definitely something to address. Hen On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Michael Wooten mwooten@gmail.com wrote: A couple of things I noticed. 1) In the JavaDocs section of the developer guide

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

+1 On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: I'm obviously +1. Looking for more votes. On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote: +1 Oliver Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell: Context:  Releasing a beta

Re: Upgrading commons-lang

maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1 release? LieGrue, strub - Original Message From: David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:35:01 PM Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang I have no problems

Re: Upgrading commons-lang

folks, please keep on voting. There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be named as long it's not a SNAPSHOT :) txs and LieGrue, strub - Original Message From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org Cc: Commons Developers List

Re: Upgrading commons-lang

From the [vote] thread, the release we're voting on is not intended to be released into the wild (the central maven repo). So, I don't know if this will help you guys or not. On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: folks, please keep on voting. There are a few

Re: Upgrading commons-lang

Hi Mark, Mark Struberg wrote: folks, please keep on voting. There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be named as long it's not a SNAPSHOT :) Well, this is exactly the point what we want to avoid. The beta release is there for giving users an impression about the

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

+1 As a user I'm looking forward to this! On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:36 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: +1 On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: I'm obviously +1. Looking for more votes. On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Oliver Heger

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

We should look into this issue before the GA: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6969236 Do we look for Sun Microsystems anywhere in the project to help out system utilities? It's changing to Oracle in JDK 7. Paul On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Michael Wooten

Re: [Digester] Sandbox annotations package ready to be revisioned and merged to /trunk

Hi all guys, any news on this? Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rahul, thanks a lot, very appreciated :) Have a nice WE, greetings, Simo

Re: [scxml-js] Question on Basic HTTP Event I/O Processor Specification

Hi, I've discovered a few other potential issues with the external communications module of the SCXML specification, but I'm wondering if the Apache Commons mailing list is actually the best forum to discuss them. A more appropriate forum might be one that deals specifically with the

Re: [scxml-js] Question on Basic HTTP Event I/O Processor Specification

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jacob Beard jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca wrote: Hi, I've discovered a few other potential issues with the external communications module of the SCXML specification, but I'm wondering if the Apache Commons mailing list is actually the best forum to discuss them. A

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

+1 Luc Le 26/07/2010 21:55, Oliver Heger a écrit : +1 Oliver Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell: Context: Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback. There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community raises them. The aim would be to _not_

[RESULT] Release Commons Fileupload 1.2.2

The vote has passed with six positive votes (Oliver Heger, Phil Steitz, Henri Yandell, Jörg Schaible, sebb, Jochen Wiedmann) and no others. I'll proceed with publishing the relases. Thanks, Jochen -- Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!

RE: [scxml-eclipse] User Feedback

I've gone through some of the basic functionality of the plug-in and generally found it to be good. I have several points of feedback: 1) A small feature request: Can you display the event name on the diagam like you do for a condition? 2) Transition properties list a Target field, which

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons Lang -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=377489projectId=2634 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Building Started at: Thu 29 Jul 2010 08:33:08 -0700 Finished at: Thu 29 Jul 2010 08:34:06 -0700 Total time: 57s Build Trigger: Schedule

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

+1 cmaj135 2010-07-30 发件人： Luc Maisonobe 发送时间： 2010-07-30 03:23:19 收件人： Commons Developers List 抄送： 主题： Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3 +1 Luc Le 26/07/2010 21:55, Oliver Heger a écrit : +1 Oliver Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell: Context: Releasing a beta