[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

2011-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5. This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please vote ASAP so we can release this update promptly. Not all binaries for all platforms have

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/05/2011 01:21 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5. This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please vote ASAP so we can release this update

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mladen, java sources work good, unfortunately I'm not able to compile C sources on my mac. On the release note, I'd replace 'Compatibility with 1.0.3' with 'Compatibility with 1.0.4', but that's not blocking. Site[1] dir is empty, is it wished? I don't see blocking issues, so I'm +1 All the

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
On 01/05/2011 03:28 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi Mladen, java sources work good, unfortunately I'm not able to compile C sources on my mac. You will need Java Developer Package for Mac OS X since Apple has first said it will deprecate Java, and then sign a deal with Oracle. However this

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mladen Just to let you know I checked out the site, is fully online :) thanks for the suggestions, very appreciated, I'll give a try!!! All the best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote: On

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5. This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please vote ASAP so we can release this update promptly. Not all

[lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread frank asseg
hola guys, i am currently working on a math expression parser, and wanted to ask if there is interest in adding such a functionality to commons-lang? it's a simple algorithm and id be happy to contribute to this project... http://projects.congrace.de/exp4j/download.html have fun! -- *frank

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Frank, I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves variables, scopes, objects, etc. Can you compare that to JEXL ? paul Le 5 janv. 2011 à 20:49, frank asseg a écrit : hola guys, i am currently working on a math expression parser, and wanted to ask if

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Ted Dunning
Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy? Why yet another? On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote: Frank, I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves variables, scopes, objects, etc. Can you compare that to JEXL ? paul Le 5

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread frank asseg
Hola Paul, On 05.01.2011 20:51, Paul Libbrecht wrote: I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves variables, scopes, objects, etc. Can you compare that to JEXL ? In comparison to JEXL i was looking for a possiblity to pass a simple math expression to an

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread frank asseg
Hola Ted, On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote: Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy? sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking about a pure mathematical expresssion parser, intended for evaluating user input and the like, not a turing complete grammer but simply a way to evaluate

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Jason Young
While we're at it, I also have a feature complete mathematical parser that evaluates sets of expressions, variables and functions all at once over an arbitrary domain. Go to http://zee.dev.java.net and see the code samples. What do you think? On Jan 5, 2011 3:18 PM, frank asseg

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Well... I never thought about such but maybe it's indeed useful. Something short and tiny that is a lot more compact than the java syntax for math but would have about the same capabilities. I am not used to commit to lang so we'll have to wait for them to answer. I find the classname

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread frank asseg
Hola Paul, On 05.01.2011 21:49, Paul Libbrecht wrote: I find the classname PostfixExpression pretty bizarre... should it be simply MathExpressionParser ? heh, you got me there, the naming is pretty awkward and stems from the fact that an infix expression 2 + 2, where the operator stands

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread frank asseg
Hola Gary! On 05.01.2011 22:04, Gary Gregory wrote: Why should this be in [lang] instead of [math]? I actually thought about posting on [math] but when i browsed the math library i gained the impression that it's much more concerned with more complex mathematical issues like integration of

RE: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Gary Gregory
Bonjour Frank, I think of [lang] as what is missing in java.lang, and, to be honest, evaluating math expressions is not on my list ;) Complex or not I expect math things in [math]. I, as others, am leery of introducing yet another expression language. Gary Gregory Senior Software Engineer

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread sebb
On 5 January 2011 12:21, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5. This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please vote ASAP so we can

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Ted Dunning
These things tend to be a slippery slope. Turing completeness is at the bottom of that hill. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:18 PM, frank asseg frank.as...@congrace.dewrote: Hola Ted, On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote: Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy? sorry, i did not make myself clear

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I would recommend against this for [lang]. [lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or religious aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements that assist the basic Java packages. A maths parser, however useful, isn't that closely related IMO. Stephen On 5

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Gary Gregory
On Jan 5, 2011, at 18:05, Stephen Colebourne scolebou...@joda.org wrote: I would recommend against this for [lang]. [lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or religious aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements that assist the basic Java packages. A

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Phil Steitz
+1 Phil On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5. This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please vote

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-collections4 (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration.