To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi,
Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for
testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be
renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5.
This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please
vote ASAP so we can release this update promptly.
Not all binaries for all platforms have
On 01/05/2011 01:21 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for
testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be
renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5.
This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please
vote ASAP so we can release this update
Hi Mladen,
java sources work good, unfortunately I'm not able to compile C
sources on my mac.
On the release note, I'd replace 'Compatibility with 1.0.3' with
'Compatibility with 1.0.4', but that's not blocking.
Site[1] dir is empty, is it wished?
I don't see blocking issues, so I'm +1
All the
On 01/05/2011 03:28 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Mladen,
java sources work good, unfortunately I'm not able to compile C
sources on my mac.
You will need Java Developer Package for Mac OS X
since Apple has first said it will deprecate Java,
and then sign a deal with Oracle.
However this
Hi Mladen
Just to let you know I checked out the site, is fully online :)
thanks for the suggestions, very appreciated, I'll give a try!!!
All the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for
testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be
renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5.
This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please
vote ASAP so we can release this update promptly.
Not all
hola guys,
i am currently working on a math expression parser, and wanted to ask if
there is interest in adding such a functionality to commons-lang?
it's a simple algorithm and id be happy to contribute to this project...
http://projects.congrace.de/exp4j/download.html
have fun!
--
*frank
Frank,
I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves
variables, scopes, objects, etc.
Can you compare that to JEXL ?
paul
Le 5 janv. 2011 à 20:49, frank asseg a écrit :
hola guys,
i am currently working on a math expression parser, and wanted to ask if
Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy?
Why yet another?
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote:
Frank,
I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally
involves variables, scopes, objects, etc.
Can you compare that to JEXL ?
paul
Le 5
Hola Paul,
On 05.01.2011 20:51, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves
variables, scopes, objects, etc.
Can you compare that to JEXL ?
In comparison to JEXL i was looking for a possiblity to pass a simple
math expression to an
Hola Ted,
On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote:
Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy?
sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking about a pure
mathematical expresssion parser, intended for evaluating user input and
the like, not a turing complete grammer but simply a way to evaluate
While we're at it, I also have a feature complete mathematical parser that
evaluates sets of expressions, variables and functions all at once over an
arbitrary domain. Go to http://zee.dev.java.net and see the code samples.
What do you think?
On Jan 5, 2011 3:18 PM, frank asseg
Well... I never thought about such but maybe it's indeed useful.
Something short and tiny that is a lot more compact than the java syntax for
math but would have about the same capabilities.
I am not used to commit to lang so we'll have to wait for them to answer.
I find the classname
Hola Paul,
On 05.01.2011 21:49, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
I find the classname PostfixExpression pretty bizarre... should it be simply
MathExpressionParser ?
heh, you got me there, the naming is pretty awkward and stems from the
fact that an infix expression 2 + 2, where the operator stands
Hola Gary!
On 05.01.2011 22:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
Why should this be in [lang] instead of [math]?
I actually thought about posting on [math] but when i browsed the math
library i gained the impression that it's much more concerned with more
complex mathematical issues like integration of
Bonjour Frank,
I think of [lang] as what is missing in java.lang, and, to be honest,
evaluating math expressions is not on my list ;)
Complex or not I expect math things in [math].
I, as others, am leery of introducing yet another expression language.
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
On 5 January 2011 12:21, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for
testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be
renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5.
This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please
vote ASAP so we can
These things tend to be a slippery slope. Turing completeness is at the
bottom of that hill.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:18 PM, frank asseg frank.as...@congrace.dewrote:
Hola Ted,
On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote:
Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy?
sorry, i did not make myself clear
I would recommend against this for [lang].
[lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or
religious aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements
that assist the basic Java packages. A maths parser, however useful,
isn't that closely related IMO.
Stephen
On 5
On Jan 5, 2011, at 18:05, Stephen Colebourne scolebou...@joda.org wrote:
I would recommend against this for [lang].
[lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or
religious aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements
that assist the basic Java packages. A
+1
Phil
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for
testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be
renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5.
This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please
vote
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration.
26 matches
Mail list logo