Re: Common checkstyle (was Re: [vfs] checkstyle)

2012-02-20 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Am 19.02.2012 22:57, schrieb Simone Tripodi: I think it is reasonable to have Commons wide defaults but let projects override them if they want to. I think that is, what Gary meant in the first place ;-)

Re: Common checkstyle (was Re: [vfs] checkstyle)

2012-02-20 Thread sebb
On 20 February 2012 09:10, Benedikt Ritter b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote: Am 19.02.2012 22:57, schrieb Simone Tripodi: I think it is reasonable to have Commons wide defaults but let projects override them if they want to. I think that is, what Gary meant in the first place ;-)

Re: Common checkstyle (was Re: [vfs] checkstyle)

2012-02-20 Thread Ralph Goers
On Feb 20, 2012, at 7:28 AM, sebb wrote: On 20 February 2012 09:10, Benedikt Ritter b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote: Am 19.02.2012 22:57, schrieb Simone Tripodi: I think it is reasonable to have Commons wide defaults but let projects override them if they want to. I think that is, what

Re: Common checkstyle (was Re: [vfs] checkstyle)

2012-02-20 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Benedikt Ritter b...@systemoutprintln.dewrote: Am 19.02.2012 22:57, schrieb Simone Tripodi: I think it is reasonable to have Commons wide defaults but let projects override them if they want to. I think that is, what Gary meant in the first place ;-)

[SANDBOX][BeanUtils2] Some thoughts on indexed properties

2012-02-20 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, today I got the time to write some more code for BeanUtils2, so I started to implement setIndexed(). Now, that I'm nearly done with it, there are two things that I'm unsure how to handle. 1. out of bounds indices: If the user passes in an index that is out of bounds, he will see a

Re: [graph] renaming weight operations

2012-02-20 Thread Claudio Squarcella
Hi Simone and all, On 19/02/2012 22:12, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi (and sorry for the late) I personally don't see the reason to be open to *Operations until *Monoid (actually, wrongly, *Weight) until there is the real need of. Anyway, please share a patch in the issue you filled - code talks

Re: [Math] Toward releasing 3.0 ?

2012-02-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. How do we proceed from here in order to release 3.0? Cf. ticket MATH-746, Things to do before releasing 3.0. Can we start to talk about an expected release date? Thanks, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-02-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-02-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-02-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: Common checkstyle (was Re: [vfs] checkstyle)

2012-02-20 Thread Simone Tripodi
Sorry but I lost you, at that point I don't understand what meaning we want to attribute to the checkstyle configuration can be overridden sentence. Do you mean that we add the suppressions file, in order to skip some violations (i.e. signature too long of the default 80 char estimated by the

Re: [graph] renaming weight operations

2012-02-20 Thread Simone Tripodi
lol, I'll take a look at it as soon as possible!!! thanks! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Claudio Squarcella squar...@dia.uniroma3.it wrote: Hi

Re: [SANDBOX][BeanUtils2] Some thoughts on indexed properties

2012-02-20 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi, today I got the time to write some more code for BeanUtils2, so I started to implement setIndexed(). nice, it is missing indeed. 1. out of bounds indices: If the user passes in an index that is out of bounds, he will see a InvocationTargetException, that wraps an