Just for information. I followed Benedikt's suggestion and I opened a issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-481
Regards.
2014-07-23 15:45 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org:
Hello Luca,
I haven't seen any activity in that component for a while. If you like to
I have attached a patch for DBUTILS-50 which requests OUT parameters for
stored procedures. My approach was to add execute() methods to QueryRunner
which will use a CallableStatement to run the SQL. If any of the
parameters passed are instances of OutParameter (a new class), the
parameter is
Hi,
I raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1037 recently,
which would add support to StringUtils for joining lists of strings
with a different end separator. The idea is to support use cases such
as:
join([a, b, c], , , and ) = a, b and c.
Does anyone have any objections to me
Hi Duncan,
I have already implemented such method before, not sure if I wrote any tests to
it though :)
+1 looks useful to me
Bruno
From: Duncan Jones djo...@apache.org
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014
Examining the bytecode, it apparently does. At least for JDK 1.7 anyway.
I reverted the change.
Apologies for the reformatting. I had my IDE configured to auto-format
files on save and I committed without checking the diff.
Thanks,
Brent
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Gary Gregory
To me, it feels out of scope for [lang]. I would never expect this to be in
java.lang for example.
Gary
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Duncan Jones djo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1037 recently,
which would add support to StringUtils for
Roger that. I think the Java compiler has been doing that for a long time.
Gary
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Brent Worden brent.wor...@gmail.com
wrote:
Examining the bytecode, it apparently does. At least for JDK 1.7 anyway.
I reverted the change.
Apologies for the reformatting. I
On 11 September 2014 14:41, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
To me, it feels out of scope for [lang]. I would never expect this to be in
java.lang for example.
Agreed.
Gary
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Duncan Jones djo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I raised
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:45 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 September 2014 14:41, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
To me, it feels out of scope for [lang]. I would never expect this to be
in
java.lang for example.
Agreed.
I see room in Commons for a [text] component
On 11 September 2014 14:49, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:45 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 September 2014 14:41, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
To me, it feels out of scope for [lang]. I would never expect this to be
in
java.lang
On 9/9/14 11:38 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
Great, thanks! I have all the new config property boilerplate in place and
I understand how it should work, but I'm debating the best way to implement
the per-key queues. It would be nice if the test iteration for each key
resumed in the same place the
Hi,
A while ago I had bought up the idea of adding residual editing (aka data
editing, outlier rejection, robust regression) to our non-linear least
squares implementations.[1] As the name suggests, the idea is to de-weight
observations that don't match the user's model. There are several ways to
On 9/11/14 8:55 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 9/9/14 11:38 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
Great, thanks! I have all the new config property boilerplate in place and
I understand how it should work, but I'm debating the best way to implement
the per-key queues. It would be nice if the test iteration for
All,
You may be aware that the ASF infra team has been working on getting a
code signing service set up.
The test project for this is Apache Tomcat and we are at the point where
we are ready to do our first real signing. So why am I writing to the
Commons dev list? Daemon.
Tomcat uses Commons
Hello.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:29:49 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi,
A while ago I had bought up the idea of adding residual editing (aka
data
editing, outlier rejection, robust regression) to our non-linear
least
squares implementations.[1] As the name suggests, the idea is to
de-weight
15 matches
Mail list logo
