RE: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in commons?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-256 is created and commented to track this. If we think this analysis makes sense, we will choose to go ECCN 5D002 self-classify category. Will wait for a few days for feedbacks. Regards, Haifeng -Original Message- From: Chen, Haifeng

Re: Stian to PMC

+1 Congrats! Sergio Fernández wrote: congrats, Stian! On May 25, 2016 6:11 PM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote: Done - now live on http://commons.apache.org/team-list.html Do I need to do something special to get Jira admin access? (e.g. to manage Versions) On 24 May 2016

Re: [Poll][VFS] Switch to Git

+1 wfm Bernd Eckenfels wrote: Hello, I would like to be able to use Git with the Apache Commons VFS repo. As we agreed upon I call out the intention to do this and ask you for your oppinion. Now that we have the 2.1 release out of the way the switch wont affect any planned steps. Anybody

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 based on RC1

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > +1 (binding) > > i do have some remarks/discussion points: > > RELEASE-NOTES.txt contains the site link as http instead of https, I > had the impression we wanted to switch the defaults? > > Is the site planned to

Re: [Poll][VFS] Switch to Git

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to be able to use Git with the Apache Commons VFS repo. As > we agreed upon I call out the intention to do this and ask you for your > oppinion. +1 Woonsan > > Now that we have the 2.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC2

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Thanks for preparing this release candidate, Gary! > > My vote: +1 (binding) > > Tested: > > +1 signatures, hashes > +1 sources-jar vs src.zip > +1 mvn clean install > +1 mvn apache-rat:check > +1 LICENSE, NOTICE

Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT

Hi All: It would be nice if components would be consistent in their use of Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT. Should we just forgo the use of LICENSE-header.txt and rely on RAT 100%? The following components contain a LICENSE-header.txt: commons-beanutils commons-chain commons-codec

Re: [Poll][VFS] Switch to Git

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to be able to use Git with the Apache Commons VFS repo. As > we agreed upon I call out the intention to do this and ask you for your > oppinion. > +1 Gary > > Now that we have the 2.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC2

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On 25 May 2016 at 05:20, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC2 is available for review here: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/csv/tags/csv-1.4-RC2 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 based on RC1

+1 (binding) i do have some remarks/discussion points: RELEASE-NOTES.txt contains the site link as http instead of https, I had the impression we wanted to switch the defaults? Is the site planned to be "rolled back" to 1.3.2 or will it stay 1.4-SNAPSHOT? Gruss Bernd Am Mon, 23 May 2016

[Poll][VFS] Switch to Git

Hello, I would like to be able to use Git with the Apache Commons VFS repo. As we agreed upon I call out the intention to do this and ask you for your oppinion. Now that we have the 2.1 release out of the way the switch wont affect any planned steps. Anybody opposed to this move? I will

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC2

Hello Gary, Build fine from sources with: Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; 2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00) Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec Java version: 1.8.0_65, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home:

Re: [Vfs] to git (was: Apache Commons git repositories now writable for all ASF committers)

Hi, Stian Soiland-Reyes schrieb am Mi., 25. Mai 2016 um 18:11 Uhr: > +1 for a general move to git, even if it is done one-by-one by lazy > consensus. > > I guess on moving, INFRA do not need to remove the old mirrored > repository in GitHub? (It should be mirrored form the

Re: Stian to PMC

Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Mi., 25. Mai 2016 um 19:35 Uhr: > I can grant you the necessary karma when I'm back to my machine. > I have added you to the commons-developers group. > > > Benedikt > > Stian Soiland-Reyes schrieb am Mi., 25. Mai 2016 um >

Re: [CSV] License Issues in Commons CSV (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC1)

On May 25, 2016 9:13 AM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote: > > Agree, we should try to avoid including test-data that requires > attribution - users of Commons CSV will then seemingly have to > propagate the NOTICE when the data is not used at runtime. > > Is there a reason why we

Re: [Vfs] to git (was: Apache Commons git repositories now writable for all ASF committers)

On May 25, 2016 9:11 AM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote: > > +1 for a general move to git, even if it is done one-by-one by lazy consensus. > > I guess on moving, INFRA do not need to remove the old mirrored > repository in GitHub? (It should be mirrored form the same location). >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC2

Thanks for preparing this release candidate, Gary! My vote: +1 (binding) Tested: +1 signatures, hashes +1 sources-jar vs src.zip +1 mvn clean install +1 mvn apache-rat:check +1 LICENSE, NOTICE (thanks!) +1 RELEASE-NOTES 0 Confusing file LICENSE-header.txt should not be in the src dist +1 mvn

Re: Stian to PMC

I can grant you the necessary karma when I'm back to my machine. Benedikt Stian Soiland-Reyes schrieb am Mi., 25. Mai 2016 um 18:11: > Done - now live on > > http://commons.apache.org/team-list.html > > > Do I need to do something special to get Jira admin access? (e.g. to >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC2

On 25 May 2016 at 05:20, Gary Gregory wrote: > Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC2 is available for review here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/csv/tags/csv-1.4-RC2 > (revision 1745420) Did you mean:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 based on RC1

My vote: +1 (binding) FYI - dist sha1 checksums according to svn r13750 6650d1c878b1142a0c8e3be3534ad24d6f422fc2 binaries/commons-fileupload-1.3.2-bin.tar.gz 0d1004f3aab4ecc62b2fb14056b9c92489d79121 binaries/commons-fileupload-1.3.2-bin.zip 6f254ad51f5e2c9d9a039995bc1a2295cabc95f6

Re: [CSV] License Issues in Commons CSV (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC1)

Agree, we should try to avoid including test-data that requires attribution - users of Commons CSV will then seemingly have to propagate the NOTICE when the data is not used at runtime. Is there a reason why we can't create equivalent test-CSV files (use the same syntax and escapes), or is the

Re: Stian to PMC

Done - now live on http://commons.apache.org/team-list.html Do I need to do something special to get Jira admin access? (e.g. to manage Versions) On 24 May 2016 at 20:20, Gary Gregory wrote: > Stian, > > You should add yourself as a PMC member here: >

Re: [Vfs] to git (was: Apache Commons git repositories now writable for all ASF committers)

+1 for a general move to git, even if it is done one-by-one by lazy consensus. I guess on moving, INFRA do not need to remove the old mirrored repository in GitHub? (It should be mirrored form the same location). Otherwise we need to be worried about open pull requests, link to forks, etc. We

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CommonsRDF 0.2.0-incubating released

The Apache CommonsRDF team is proud to announce the latest release of Apache CommonsRDF 0.2.0. Apache BroCommons RDF aims to provide a common library for RDF 1.1 that could be implemented by systems on the Java Virtual Machine. More details can be found at https://commonsrdf.incubator.apache.org/

Re: svn commit: r1745314 - in /commons/proper/fileupload/tags: commons-fileupload-1.3.2/ commons-fileupload-1.3.2RC1/

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > I think the tag got created when Jochen played around with the > maven-release-plugin. I didn't notice when I created the RC we're currently > voting for. The tag can probably be dropped, since it has never been used.

Re: [Vfs] to git (was: Apache Commons git repositories now writable for all ASF committers)

Gary Gregory schrieb am Di., 24. Mai 2016 um 23:03 Uhr: > I think we have to do 1-by-1 with infra anyway but I'd prefer to do it all. > My guess from recollections from previous email threads is that folks would > rather do this 1-by-1. You could start a [POLL] thread. >

Re: svn commit: r1745314 - in /commons/proper/fileupload/tags: commons-fileupload-1.3.2/ commons-fileupload-1.3.2RC1/

Hello, sebb schrieb am Mi., 25. Mai 2016 um 00:34 Uhr: > On 24 May 2016 at 08:32, wrote: > > Author: jochen > > Date: Tue May 24 07:32:56 2016 > > New Revision: 1745314 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1745314=rev > > Log: (empty) > > What's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 based on RC1

My +1 for this release. Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Mo., 23. Mai 2016 um 17:23 Uhr: > It has been a long time since the last release of Apache Commons > FileUpload, so I'd like to release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 based on > RC1. > > Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 RC1

Re: [CSV] License Issues in Commons CSV (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC1)

On 25 May 2016 at 00:13, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:29 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 24 May 2016 at 23:14, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > Ok, so maybe I just exclude these files from the release and add some >> > Assume