On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:54 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 February 2018 at 20:29, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Pascal Schumacher <
> > pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everybody,
> >>
> >> after further consideration I'm not sure if it is a good idea to
> d
On 12 February 2018 at 20:29, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Pascal Schumacher <
> pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> after further consideration I'm not sure if it is a good idea to deprecate
>> StrMatcher (to convert it to an interface and make
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 19:19:58 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> wrote:
> > This came up also for commons rdf where we also have everything
> immutable,
> > which I think is a good principle to keep for modern Java 8 programming.
> >
> > So
Github user stain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43
Picking up this - @ajs6f do you still think we should proceed along those
lines? I am also reluctant to making the abstract factory (builder)
serializable, but I can see the reasoning, particularly
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/48
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/50
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Github user stain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/49#discussion_r167732171
--- Diff:
commons-rdf-simple/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/simple/experimental/AbstractRDFParser.java
---
@@ -58,8 +60,12 @@
*/
public a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/52
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:50:26 +0100, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-02-10, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 08:08:12 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
If a Java package and artifact ID contain "internal" or "private"
in
the
name, that would be pretty clear.
Do you suggest that, say, the benchmarki
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Pascal Schumacher <
> pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> Am 12.02.2018 um 18:52 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>
>>> I agree 100% and will proceed. I thought about it overnight and it does
>>> not
>>> make se
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Pascal Schumacher <
pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> after further consideration I'm not sure if it is a good idea to deprecate
> StrMatcher (to convert it to an interface and make the naming match
> *StringLookup), as this means that StrBui
What about now? :-)
Am 12.02.2018 um 20:53 schrieb Gary Gregory:
When?
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
When?
Gary
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Pascal Schumacher <
pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Am 12.02.2018 um 18:52 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>
>> I agree 100% and will proceed. I thought about it overnight and it does
>> not
>> make sense to leave a mix of abstract classes and interfaces in
>> StrSubstit
Hello everybody,
after further consideration I'm not sure if it is a good idea to
deprecate StrMatcher (to convert it to an interface and make the naming
match *StringLookup), as this means that StrBuilder and StrTokenizer
also have to be deprecated.
Not long ago we told users of these class
Am 12.02.2018 um 18:52 schrieb Gary Gregory:
I agree 100% and will proceed. I thought about it overnight and it does not
make sense to leave a mix of abstract classes and interfaces in
StrSubstitutor.
+1, but
please revert "Update actual Checkstyle from 6.19 to 8.8.", as
Checkstyle 7+ requrie
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Chas Honton wrote:
> Definitely create interfaces.
>
I agree 100% and will proceed. I thought about it overnight and it does not
make sense to leave a mix of abstract classes and interfaces in
StrSubstitutor.
Gary
>
> Chas
>
> > On Feb 11, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Ga
17 matches
Mail list logo