Java 8 on Ubuntu LTS, `mvn clean test` passes OK. But I'm not able to generate
the site with `mvn site`, as it gives me:
```[INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.8:run (prepare-checkout) @ commons-csv ---
[WARNING] Parameter tasks is deprecated, use target instead
[INFO] Executing tasks
main:
[ex
(please make sure to CC me on replies)
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 01:09, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01.06.19 23:51, Alex Herbert wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 1 Jun 2019, at 20:59, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> created an appropriate branch[1] with a first implementation t
As discussed on prior threads you should have both. There will need to be
static convenience methods for a user who wants to make a very simple call,
say Stats.mean() . But, as Alex said, this convenience class will just be a
front end for the statistics functionality itself. That needs to be in it
> On 2 Jun 2019, at 13:45, Virendra singh Rajpurohit
> wrote:
>
> I've been trying to make summary statistics class. I have some doubt. There
> is a class DoubleSummaryStatistics in java.util package(There are two more
> for Int and Long). I'll attach this file here.
> Do I have to design S
I've been trying to make summary statistics class. I have some doubt. There
is a class DoubleSummaryStatistics in java.util package(There are two more
for Int and Long). I'll attach this file here.
Do I have to design SummaryStatistics in this way only? I mean, description
on DoubleSummaryStatistic
Hello.
Le dim. 2 juin 2019 à 10:00, Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> On 02.06.19 00:06, Alex Herbert wrote:
> >
> >> On 1 Jun 2019, at 22:49, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> Le sam. 1 juin 2019 à 21:56, Karl Heinz Marbaise a
> >> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I've cr
I have a new approach to write a reflection-equals utility that will likely
execute noticeably faster than the current approach. It will also let us add
new strategies, such as an EqualsBuilder to use method properties, as requested
in issue LANG-332. It will also allow us to add whatever other
Hi,
On 01.06.19 23:51, Alex Herbert wrote:
On 1 Jun 2019, at 20:59, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
created an appropriate branch[1] with a first implementation to check If
this is going into the right direction if not please let me know…
>
I do not see why the private count variable is an
Hi,
On 02.06.19 00:06, Alex Herbert wrote:
On 1 Jun 2019, at 22:49, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
Le sam. 1 juin 2019 à 21:56, Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
Hi,
I've created a branch[1] which fixes some checkstyle reported issues.
The resulting build[2] shows the issues have been fixed.
