Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 22:07, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 30 Jul 2019, at 19:28, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 15:38, Alex Herbert > > a écrit : > >> > >> On 30/07/2019 10:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> Hello. >

Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: commons-dbcp #383

"ERROR: Maven Home /home/jenkins/tools/maven/latest3 doesnt exist That seems fundamentally broken. Any ideas? Gary -- Forwarded message - From: Apache Jenkins Server Date: Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:43 PM Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: commons-dbcp #383 To: See <

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

> On 30 Jul 2019, at 19:28, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 15:38, Alex Herbert > a écrit : >> >> On 30/07/2019 10:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a >>> écrit :

[DBCP] org.apache.commons.dbcp2.Utils.DISCONNECTION_SQL_CODES is mutable

Hi All, I think we should make org.apache.commons.dbcp2.Utils.DISCONNECTION_SQL_CODES an immutable set instead of a mutable set. Thoughts? Gary

Re: [lang3][collection4][text] Investigation on the diffusion of innovation along with java releases

Hello. Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 17:59, Matt Sicker a écrit : > > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 08:50, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > I certainly agree with Gary as to why "Commons" is not there being a > > practical issue (of no concerted road map and lacking developers to > > implement it). However, did

Re: [lang3][collection4][text] Investigation on the diffusion of innovation along with java releases

I would love to see Kotlin and Java libraries in Commons. Gary On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, 11:59 Matt Sicker wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 08:50, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > I certainly agree with Gary as to why "Commons" is not there being a > > practical issue (of no concerted road map and

Re: [lang3][collection4][text] Investigation on the diffusion of innovation along with java releases

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 08:50, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > I certainly agree with Gary as to why "Commons" is not there being a > practical issue (of no concerted road map and lacking developers to > implement it). However, did I understand correctly that you consider > such a development to be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.4 based on RC2

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:12 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Jul 29, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > Based on the git tag... > > Do you know what these new Checkstyle violations are about: > > > > "Line does not match expected header line of ''. > > > > ? > > This is indeed a

Re: [lang3][collection4][text] Investigation on the diffusion of innovation along with java releases

Hi. Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 15:38, Matt Sicker a écrit : > > Yeah, Commons libraries are almost intentionally behind the times in order > to provide functionality to the most people. Sometimes, Java even adds > things that make a Commons library somewhat redundant in theory (like NIO2 > from

Re: [lang3][collection4][text] Investigation on the diffusion of innovation along with java releases

Yeah, Commons libraries are almost intentionally behind the times in order to provide functionality to the most people. Sometimes, Java even adds things that make a Commons library somewhat redundant in theory (like NIO2 from Java 7 which could theoretically replace Commons VFS as an API). I can

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 30/07/2019 10:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? Not yet. I think there are a few outstanding items [...] Anything missing? - RNG-110: The PR for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.4 based on RC2

> On Jul 29, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Based on the git tag... > Do you know what these new Checkstyle violations are about: > > "Line does not match expected header line of ''. > > ? This is indeed a curiosity. Apparently checkstyle is configured to look for a

Re: [lang3][collection4][text] Investigation on the diffusion of innovation along with java releases

Fernando, In general, it feels to me the Apache Commons community is split and slow moving to adopt newer version of Java. Currently, updating the platform requirements of a component to Java 8 causes some people to react with "What about people running on Java 7?!" comments, or "What Java 8

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Hello. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? > >> Not yet. I think there are a few outstanding items [...] Anything missing? Regards, Gilles

[lang3][collection4][text] Investigation on the diffusion of innovation along with java releases

Dear Developers, we are members of the ZEST research group (Zurich Empirical Software Engineering Team) based at the University of Zurich and the Delft University of Technology. We are conducting an investigation on the diffusion of innovations and we focus on the adoption of new language