Re: [IO] release soon

It's not, I am talking about a different regression. The OSGi header issue is new. Gary On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:12 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > By the way, I saw IO-733, but it was not obvious to me it was related to OSGi > headers ;) > > > Le 7 juin 2021 à 15:04, Gary Gregory a écrit

Re: [IO] release soon

By the way, I saw IO-733, but it was not obvious to me it was related to OSGi headers ;) > Le 7 juin 2021 à 15:04, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Please search Jira before you create duplicate issues. > > Gary > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, 08:44 Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I created

Re: [IO] release soon

Sorry about that, let me remove this Jira. Regards JB > Le 7 juin 2021 à 15:04, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Please search Jira before you create duplicate issues. > > Gary > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, 08:44 Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow

Re: [IO] release soon

Please search Jira before you create duplicate issues. Gary On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, 08:44 Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hi, > > I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-738 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-738> about OSGi headers. > > I’m working on a PR to fix the headers. >

Re: [IO] release soon

Hi, I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-738 about OSGi headers. I’m working on a PR to fix the headers. Would it be possible to include in 2.10.0 ? Thanks ! Regards JB > Le 7 juin 2021 à 14:41, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > We've h

[IO] release soon

We've had the same rehression issue reported a few times since 2.9.0, so I will create a release candidate for 2.10.0 very soon. FYI it is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-733 Gary

[IO] release

Hi all, I think we are pretty close to a release candidate. I might cut one soon. Gary

Re: [IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix

ew it and consider the plan for a 2.9.0 version? > > Kind regards > Boris > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Gary Gregory > Gesendet: Montag, 11. Januar 2021 17:49 > An: Commons Developers List > Betreff: Re: [IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix > >

AW: [IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix

regards Boris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Gary Gregory Gesendet: Montag, 11. Januar 2021 17:49 An: Commons Developers List Betreff: Re: [IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix It's possible that this is a bug in the tests or that your account does not have the proper

AW: [IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix

ile.PathUtils.deleteFile(PathUtils.java:486) at org.apache.commons.io.file.PathUtils.delete(PathUtils.java:393) at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.forceDelete(FileUtils.java:1324) ... 45 more ==> Build completes without any other failure or error Kind regards Boris -Ursprüngliche Nachrich

Re: [IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix

/sun.nio.fs.UnixException.translateToIOException(UnixException.java:90) > at > > java.base/sun.nio.fs.UnixException.rethrowAsIOException(UnixException.java:111) > at > > java.base/sun.nio.fs.UnixException.rethrowAsIOException(UnixException.java:116) > at > > java

AW: [IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix

ns Developers List Betreff: Re: [IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix In the meantime, you would be well advised to test with a 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT build. Gary On Fri, Jan 8, 2021, 09:50 Gary Gregory wrote: > I plan on creating a release candidate for 2.9.0 "soon", maybe this &

Re: [IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix

In the meantime, you would be well advised to test with a 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT build. Gary On Fri, Jan 8, 2021, 09:50 Gary Gregory wrote: > I plan on creating a release candidate for 2.9.0 "soon", maybe > this weekend or next, no guarantees though... > > Gary > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021, 05:18 wrote: >

Re: [IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix

I plan on creating a release candidate for 2.9.0 "soon", maybe this weekend or next, no guarantees though... Gary On Fri, Jan 8, 2021, 05:18 wrote: > Dear IO developers, > > > > you already fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-692 The > underlying issue blocks the component upgrade in

[IO] Release 2.8.1 or 2.9 for IO-692 fix

Dear IO developers, you already fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-692 The underlying issue blocks the component upgrade in WildFly Core, due to a breaking integration unit test. (Pull is here: https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/pull/4400 ) It would be great to have the new en

Re: [IO] release candidate soon

On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 13:07, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le jeu. 3 sept. 2020 à 13:55, sebb a écrit : > > > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 20:54, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, 15:50 Xeno Amess wrote: > > > > > > > Why so hurry? > > > > > > > > > > I need to use new APIs now. Rele

Re: [IO] release candidate soon

Le jeu. 3 sept. 2020 à 13:55, sebb a écrit : > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 20:54, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, 15:50 Xeno Amess wrote: > > > > > Why so hurry? > > > > > > > I need to use new APIs now. Releases happen all the time, more releases > > more often is better than big b

Re: [IO] release candidate soon

On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 20:54, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, 15:50 Xeno Amess wrote: > > > Why so hurry? > > > > I need to use new APIs now. Releases happen all the time, more releases > more often is better than big bang releases IMO, IOW RERO (Release Early, > Release Often). > > I

Re: [IO] release candidate soon

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, 15:50 Xeno Amess wrote: > Why so hurry? > I need to use new APIs now. Releases happen all the time, more releases more often is better than big bang releases IMO, IOW RERO (Release Early, Release Often). Is there any severe bug solved? > See changes.xml, severity is relati

Re: [IO] release candidate soon

Why so hurry? Is there any severe bug solved? And here goes another question. why is commons-io's group ID be commons-io but not com. apache. commons? Gary Gregory 于 2020年9月3日周四 上午1:57写道： > Hi all, > > I plan on cutting a release candidate very soon, probably tonight. > > Gary >

[IO] release candidate soon

Hi all, I plan on cutting a release candidate very soon, probably tonight. Gary

Re: [IO] Release 2.7 soon

Very cool! Would it be possible to get this one included - https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/110 On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 at 17:54, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > It's been a long time since 2.6, so plan on cutting an RC for 2.7 soon-ish. > > Gary -- Adam Retter skype: adam.retter tw

[IO] Release 2.7 soon

Hi All: It's been a long time since 2.6, so plan on cutting an RC for 2.7 soon-ish. Gary

Re: [IO] release 2.2?

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > I committed a small refactoring. Please comment and/or continue refactoring. Looks good to me, thanks for doing this. Niall > Thank you, > Gary > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 23 January 2012 15:27, Gary Gregory

Re: [IO] release 2.2?

I committed a small refactoring. Please comment and/or continue refactoring. Thank you, Gary On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23 January 2012 15:27, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Niall Pemberton < > niall.pember...@gmail.com > >> wrote: > > > >> I

Re: [IO] release 2.2?

On 23 January 2012 15:27, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > >> I find the behaviour of FileUtils.directoryContains() method very >> strange that it would return true for a file that doesn't exist. Since >> this is a new method that will be released

Re: [IO] release 2.2?

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I find the behaviour of FileUtils.directoryContains() method very > strange that it would return true for a file that doesn't exist. Since > this is a new method that will be released for the first time in the > next release, then it woul

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

My +1 Gary On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Good day to you all: > > I have prepared Commons IO 2.1-RC6. > > The differences with RC5 are: > > - build.xml: Pick up Sebb's fix for the JUnit download mess. > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/tags/c

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

Gary Gregory wrote: > Good day to you all: > > I have prepared Commons IO 2.1-RC6. > > The differences with RC5 are: > > - build.xml: Pick up Sebb's fix for the JUnit download mess. > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC6 > > Site: > > https:/

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > +1 > thanks for the hard work Gary! > YW :) Gary > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > > Both ant and maven builds work fine with Java

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

+1 thanks for the hard work Gary! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Both ant and maven builds work fine with Java 1.5 under Windows 7. Artifacts > look good. The link to the site provided below is obvious

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

Both ant and maven builds work fine with Java 1.5 under Windows 7. Artifacts look good. The link to the site provided below is obviously not correct, but I built it locally and it is fine. So +1 Oliver Am 03.10.2011 23:35, schrieb Gary Gregory: Good day to you all: I have prepared Commons I

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

On 4 October 2011 02:40, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/3/11 6:32 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 4 October 2011 02:15, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 10/3/11 6:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: Sigs, hashes are good. Contents look good. Ant and Maven builds run clean on Sun 1.5, 1.6, Jrockit 1.5, 1.6,

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

On 10/3/11 6:32 PM, sebb wrote: > On 4 October 2011 02:15, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 10/3/11 6:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> Sigs, hashes are good. >>> Contents look good. >>> Ant and Maven builds run clean on Sun 1.5, 1.6, Jrockit 1.5, 1.6, >>> Apple 1.6 >>> Release notes look good. >>> >>> +1 >>>

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

On 4 October 2011 02:15, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/3/11 6:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Sigs, hashes are good. >> Contents look good. >> Ant and Maven builds run clean on Sun 1.5, 1.6, Jrockit 1.5, 1.6, >> Apple 1.6 >> Release notes look good. >> >> +1 >> >> Nice work! >> >> Remember to get rid of

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

On 10/3/11 6:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Sigs, hashes are good. > Contents look good. > Ant and Maven builds run clean on Sun 1.5, 1.6, Jrockit 1.5, 1.6, > Apple 1.6 > Release notes look good. > > +1 > > Nice work! > > Remember to get rid of the cruft before moving the release files to > /dist. > I

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

Sigs, hashes are good. Contents look good. Ant and Maven builds run clean on Sun 1.5, 1.6, Jrockit 1.5, 1.6, Apple 1.6 Release notes look good. +1 Nice work! Remember to get rid of the cruft before moving the release files to /dist. I am assuming that what we are actually voting on (and what wil

[VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

Good day to you all: I have prepared Commons IO 2.1-RC6. The differences with RC5 are: - build.xml: Pick up Sebb's fix for the JUnit download mess. Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC6 Site: https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/io/2.1/RC6/ Bina

[VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC5

Good day to you all: I have prepared Commons IO 2.1-RC5. The differences with RC4 are: - TailerTest: Make the test sleep longer while the Tailer works. - Use includeantruntime="false" in build.xml - Update build.xml to JUnit 4.10 from 3.8.1 - Update POM to JUnit 4.10 from 4.9 - Remove superfluou

[CANCEL][VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

This vote is canceled. Ant build refers to JUnit 3.x. I'll fix that and see if I can reproduce the tailer fail. Thank you, Gary On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:57 AM, sebb wrote: > On 1 October 2011 12:54, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Hi Hen, > > > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > >> -1. > >> > >> I got th

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

On 1 October 2011 12:54, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Hen, > > Henri Yandell wrote: > >> -1. >> >> I got the unit test failure again: >> >> Failed tests:   testTailer(org.apache.commons.io.input.TailerTest): >> fileNotFound should not be called expected:<0> but was:<1> >> >> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

Hi Hen, Henri Yandell wrote: > -1. > > I got the unit test failure again: > > Failed tests: testTailer(org.apache.commons.io.input.TailerTest): > fileNotFound should not be called expected:<0> but was:<1> > > Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.959 > sec <<< FAI

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

-1. I got the unit test failure again: Failed tests: testTailer(org.apache.commons.io.input.TailerTest): fileNotFound should not be called expected:<0> but was:<1> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.959 sec <<< FAILURE! testTailer(org.apache.commons.io.input.Tail

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 29.09.2011 14:58, schrieb Gary Gregory: Good day to you all: I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4. The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date RELEASE-NOTES.txt Tag: https://svn.apache.org

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

Gary Gregory wrote: > Good day to you all: > > I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4. > > The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date > RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC4/ > > Site: > > https://people.apache.org

[VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

Resending from my Apache account, the message did not make it to the ML for some reason. Arg. -- Forwarded message -- From: Gary Gregory Date: Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM Subject: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4 To: Commons Developers List Good day to you all: I have

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

Pardon my bad link, binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-005/ Gary On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Good day to you all: > > I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4. > > The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date

[VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

Good day to you all: I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4. The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date RELEASE-NOTES.txt Tag: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC4/ Site: https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/io/2.1/RC4/ Binaries: https://r

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC3

Hi Niall + Gary, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jörg Schaible > wrote: >> Hi Gary, >> >> Gary Gregory wrote: >> >>> Good day to you all: >>> >>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote >>> because I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC3

On Sep 28, 2011, at 21:42, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Gary, >> >> Gary Gregory wrote: >> >>> Good day to you all: >>> >>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because >>> I botched things up and left the tags

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC3

Thank you for the review. I'll get to it tomorrow. Gary On Sep 28, 2011, at 18:08, "Jörg Schaible" wrote: > Hi Gary, > > Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Good day to you all: >> >> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because >> I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC3

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Gary, > > Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Good day to you all: >> >> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because >> I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.) >> >> Tag: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commo

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC3

Hi Gary, Gary Gregory wrote: > Good day to you all: > > I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because > I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.) > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC3/ > > Site: > > https://peopl

[VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC3

Good day to you all: I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.) Tag: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC3/ Site: https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/io/2.1/RC3/ Binaries: htt