So, for places where you want to make use of streams, make your API
take a Stream rather than a Collection or whatever, and require
the user to choose whether to call parallelStream() or stream().
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 1/15/15 2:24 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>
On 1/15/15 2:24 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 01/08/2015 12:34 PM, Gilles wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Raising this issue once again.
>> Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major release?
>>
> [ ] Java 5
> [x] Java 6
> [x] Java 7
> [ ] Java 8
> [ ] Java 9
>
> A while ago I thoug
On 01/15/2015 03:24 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 01/08/2015 12:34 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
Raising this issue once again.
Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major release?
[ ] Java 5
[x] Java 6
[x] Java 7
[ ] Java 8
[ ] Java 9
A while ago I thought that it wou
On 01/08/2015 12:34 PM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Raising this issue once again.
> Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major release?
>
[ ] Java 5
[x] Java 6
[x] Java 7
[ ] Java 8
[ ] Java 9
A while ago I thought that it would be cool to switch to Java 7/8 for
some of t
Le 08/01/2015 12:34, Gilles a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> Raising this issue once again.
> Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major release?
>
> [ ] Java 5
> [ ] Java 6
> [ ] Java 7
> [ ] Java 8
> [ ] Java 9
I would say 7 or 8.
best regards,
Luc
>
> ?
>
> Gilles
>
>
> On Thu,
I wouldn't think you'd want to begin anything "new" using an EOLed
version of Java. I'd go with at least 7.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Raising this issue once again.
> Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major release?
>
> [ ] Java 5
> [ ] Java 6
>
On 1/8/15 4:34 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Raising this issue once again.
> Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major release?
>
> [ ] Java 5
> [ ] Java 6
> [x] Java 7
> [ ] Java 8
> [ ] Java 9
Phil
>
> ?
>
> Gilles
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:34:20 +, sebb wrote:
>> I've
My clients started to use Java 7 a few months before, so I wouldn't choose
Java 8. I know it's new and shinny and as a developer I'd love to play with
it, but unfortunately, users are using it. I'd go for Java 7 and plan Java
8 for Math 5.0
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
2015-01-08 13:57 GMT+01:00 Martin Grotle Soukup <
martin.grotle.sou...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I am only a user of the library, but I would be excited to see CM take
> advantage of the new features of java 8.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin Grotle Soukup
>
>
> 2015-01-08 12:34 GMT+01:00 Gilles :
>
> > Hi
Hi,
I am only a user of the library, but I would be excited to see CM take
advantage of the new features of java 8.
Best regards,
Martin Grotle Soukup
2015-01-08 12:34 GMT+01:00 Gilles :
> Hi.
>
> Raising this issue once again.
> Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major relea
Hi.
Raising this issue once again.
Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major release?
[ ] Java 5
[ ] Java 6
[ ] Java 7
[ ] Java 8
[ ] Java 9
?
Gilles
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:34:20 +, sebb wrote:
I've had to give up trying to get Continuum to use Git, so I set up a
Je
11 matches
Mail list logo
