Hi.
There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've uploaded
on April 1, concerning this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361
Is there an implied policy of "silence gives consent"?
Someone had suggested creating a branch. That would be a way to set up a
fully working
On 27/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've uploaded
> on April 1, concerning this issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361
>
> Is there an implied policy of "silence gives consent"?
>
Apache does have a concept of
> > There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've uploaded
> > on April 1, concerning this issue:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361
> >
> > Is there an implied policy of "silence gives consent"?
> >
>
> Apache does have a concept of lazy consensus, but that applie
- "Gilles Sadowski" a écrit :
> > > There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've
> uploaded
> > > on April 1, concerning this issue:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361
I'm sorry, but I simply didn't find time. I am very busy these times and will
not find
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Not sure why you need multiple jars.
> >
> > To enable runtime selection of the L10N implementation, letting the
> > user
> > choose whether he wants to depend on the CAL10N external library or
> > whether
> > he is happy with the default (English) message text.
>
> I thi
On 27/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > > There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've uploaded
> > > on April 1, concerning this issue:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361
> > >
> > > Is there an implied policy of "silence gives consent"?
> > >
> >
> >
--
From: "sebb"
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:57 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: Re: [Math] What about issue 361?
On 27/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > There haven't been any comments abo
> > They are, in the files posted on the JIRA page of the issue.
> > The sample code is fully working.
>
> There don't seem to be any properties files.
> It would be helpful to have say French and English files for testing.
You are right; sorry. I've just attached an example.
> > [...]
> > >
On 28/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > > They are, in the files posted on the JIRA page of the issue.
> > > The sample code is fully working.
> >
> > There don't seem to be any properties files.
> > It would be helpful to have say French and English files for testing.
>
>
> You are right;
> > The advantage of the proposed "trick" is that you don't have to write any
> > checking code.
> >
>
> But it's more effort to build the code,
Is your computer threatening to go on strike? ;-)
> and possibly more effort for the user.
Certainly: he'll have to add 1 "dependency" line...
> >
On 28/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > > The advantage of the proposed "trick" is that you don't have to write any
> > > checking code.
> > >
> >
> > But it's more effort to build the code,
>
>
> Is your computer threatening to go on strike? ;-)
No, but you already said that you don't kno
Hi.
> > > But it's more effort to build the code,
> >
> >
> > Is your computer threatening to go on strike? ;-)
>
> No, but you already said that you don't know how to update the Maven
> builds to cope with the extra jars.
Does that mean "Don't propose anything unless you are able to carry it o
12 matches
Mail list logo
