Am 15.12.2013 22:29, schrieb Phil Steitz:
> On 12/14/13, 12:01 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>> Am 14.12.2013 05:20, schrieb Phil Steitz:
>>> On 12/13/13, 12:34 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/13/13, 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
On 12/14/13, 12:01 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 14.12.2013 05:20, schrieb Phil Steitz:
>> On 12/13/13, 12:34 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
On 12/13/13, 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Phil Steitz
Am 14.12.2013 05:20, schrieb Phil Steitz:
> On 12/13/13, 12:34 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/13/13, 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Phil Steitz
>>> wrote:
> On 12/12/13, 6:50 PM, Gary Gregory wr
On 12/13/13, 12:34 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 12/13/13, 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Phil Steitz
>> wrote:
On 12/12/13, 6:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> We talk on and off
On 13 December 2013 20:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 12/13/13, 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Phil Steitz
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 12/12/13, 6:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >>> Hi All:
>> >>>
>> >>> We t
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/13/13, 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/12/13, 6:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>> Hi All:
> >>>
> >>> We talk on and off as to how painful it is to release component
On 12/13/13, 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 12/12/13, 6:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Hi All:
>>>
>>> We talk on and off as to how painful it is to release components.
>>>
>>> One of these pains is that we distribute to multiple places
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/13, 6:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > We talk on and off as to how painful it is to release components.
> >
> > One of these pains is that we distribute to multiple places: An Apache
> > "dist" folder and the Apache Ma
On 13/12/2013 02:50, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> We talk on and off as to how painful it is to release components.
>
> One of these pains is that we distribute to multiple places: An Apache
> "dist" folder and the Apache Maven repository.
>
> Clearly, Maven is here to stay.
>
> So why not
Le 13/12/2013 10:58, Bernd Eckenfels a écrit :
> I find it very usefull when the IDE will automatically download javadocs
> and sources for a given dependency so I can browse into. For this to
> work -src and -javadoc have to be in the repo.
I agree, but that's the -sources artifact, not the -src
Am 13.12.2013, 07:29 Uhr, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg :
I don't think the -src and -bin files should be in Maven, that's not its
purpose.
I find it very usefull when the IDE will automatically download javadocs
and sources for a given dependency so I can browse into. For this to work
-src and -j
Le 13/12/2013 03:50, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> Thoughts?
I don't think the -src and -bin files should be in Maven, that's not its
purpose.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For addition
On 12/12/13, 6:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> We talk on and off as to how painful it is to release components.
>
> One of these pains is that we distribute to multiple places: An Apache
> "dist" folder and the Apache Maven repository.
>
> Clearly, Maven is here to stay.
>
> So why not de
Hi All:
We talk on and off as to how painful it is to release components.
One of these pains is that we distribute to multiple places: An Apache
"dist" folder and the Apache Maven repository.
Clearly, Maven is here to stay.
So why not deploy the -src and -bin files to Maven and forget about dis
14 matches
Mail list logo