d files are generated by GNU tools and
> >>>> cannot be re-licensed. They are not in the binary packages but they do
> >>>> contaminate the source archives. It is not yet mentioned in the
> NOTICE file
> >>>> but I guess there is a ASF wide regulation for those b
source archives. It is not yet mentioned in the NOTICE file
>>>> but I guess there is a ASF wide regulation for those build scripts. Does
>>>> anybody know?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for looking at the issues, would be good if you commit smaller
>>>>
ts. Does anybody know?
>>>
>>> Thanks for looking at the issues, would be good if you commit smaller
>>> batches more often, since there is generally some more interest in the
>>> project currently. If you want I can help with the Javadoc warnings?
>>>
&g
nfels.net
>> ____________
>> From: Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 4:00:08 PM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: [daemon] : fixing some general stuff
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm going
n the
> project currently. If you want I can help with the Javadoc warnings?
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
> --
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
> From: Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 4:00:08 PM
> To: Commons D
On 9 July 2017 15:00:08 BST, Amey Jadiye wrote:
>#2. RAT : apache-rat is crying for 4 files, it is ok to add APACHE
>LICENSE
>but I found they already have GPLv3 in them, shall we replace them, or
>we
>need consent ?
>src/native/unix/support/config.sub
From: Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 4:00:08 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [daemon] : fixing some general stuff
Hi All,
I'm going through apache daemon code and trying to fix the stuff breaking
with below maven options, also would like to know i
Hi All,
I'm going through apache daemon code and trying to fix the stuff breaking
with below maven options, also would like to know if some more checks can
be added since this repo contains lot of C code.
mvn clean verify apache-rat:check clirr:check checkstyle:check
findbugs:check