Re: [math] releasing 3.6

2015-12-31 Thread Phil Steitz
On 12/29/15 1:09 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 29/12/2015 20:48, Phil Steitz a écrit : >> >>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two points I >>> wanted to address before that, both related to ODE. T

Re: [math] releasing 3.6

2015-12-31 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Rostislav, Le 31/12/2015 13:43, Rostislav Krasny a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two >> points I wanted to address before that, both related to >> ODE. These points are now completed: the

Re: [math] releasing 3.6

2015-12-31 Thread Rostislav Krasny
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two > points I wanted to address before that, both related to > ODE. These points are now completed: the Adams methods > stability issues have been fixed, and a bunch a field-

Re: [math] releasing 3.6

2015-12-29 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 12/29/2015 07:39 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two > points I wanted to address before that, both related to > ODE. These points are now completed: the Adams methods > stability issues have been fixed, and a bunch a field-based > i

Re: [math] releasing 3.6

2015-12-29 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 29/12/2015 20:48, Phil Steitz a écrit : > > >> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two points I >> wanted to address before that, both related to ODE. These points >> are now completed: the Adams me

Re: [math] releasing 3.6

2015-12-29 Thread Phil Steitz
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > Hi all, > > A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two > points I wanted to address before that, both related to > ODE. These points are now completed: the Adams methods > stability issues have been fixed, and a bunch a f

Re: [math] releasing 3.6

2015-12-29 Thread Gary Gregory
I'm all for RERO. Gary On Dec 29, 2015 10:39 AM, "Luc Maisonobe" wrote: > Hi all, > > A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two > points I wanted to address before that, both related to > ODE. These points are now completed: the Adams methods > stability issues have been fixed,

[math] releasing 3.6

2015-12-29 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi all, A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two points I wanted to address before that, both related to ODE. These points are now completed: the Adams methods stability issues have been fixed, and a bunch a field-based integrators are available. There are 3 issues in JIRA that

Re: [math] releasing 3.6 ?

2015-11-04 Thread Phil Steitz
I just want to clean up the mess I made in MATH-1246, ideally actually fixing the issue. I will make another go of it this weekend and if I can't actually fix it, I will back out the dubious fix. If everything else is ready before it is sorted, we can just push the fix version. On 11/4/15 2:13 A

Re: [math] releasing 3.6 ?

2015-11-04 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/04/2015 10:13 AM, luc wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to release 3.6 in the upcoming weeks. > There have been a bunch of bug fixes and a few evolutions that are > important to me. > > I am still working on two things both related to ode: first trying > to stabilize the Adams-BAshforth and

[math] releasing 3.6 ?

2015-11-04 Thread luc
Hi all, I would like to release 3.6 in the upcoming weeks. There have been a bunch of bug fixes and a few evolutions that are important to me. I am still working on two things both related to ode: first trying to stabilize the Adams-BAshforth and Adams-Moulton integrators which sometime get stuc