Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Aw: Re: Proposal to introduce JUnit 5 in commons-numbers

2019-06-05 Thread Eitan Adler
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 16:09, Heinrich Bohne wrote: > So, if the migration from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5 has to happen > instantaneously, how about creating a new branch for the migration? It's > a lot of files that have to be refactored, which is going to take some > time, and since the changes will

Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Aw: Re: Proposal to introduce JUnit 5 in commons-numbers

2019-06-04 Thread Heinrich Bohne
So, if the migration from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5 has to happen instantaneously, how about creating a new branch for the migration? It's a lot of files that have to be refactored, which is going to take some time, and since the changes will need to be reviewed, it would probably be easier if the

Aw: Re: Proposal to introduce JUnit 5 in commons-numbers

2019-05-27 Thread Sven Rathgeber
+1 We did the migration 4 -> 5 for various products at work. It was straightforward. I vote for a clean cut, as well. s/Before/BeforeEach/ s/After/AfterEach and you are halfway through. Sven Gesendet: Montag, 27. Mai 2019 um 07:28 Uhr Von: "Eitan Adler" An: "Heinrich Bohne" Cc: