for 1.5 to 1.6:
Seems only 1.6 users can benefit from that...does it worth?
for 1.5 to 1.8:
GREAATE! +1 for it.
T. Schapitz 于2020年7月12日周日 下午6:16写道:
> Hi there,
>
> maybe a bit late in the game, because the original post regarding this
> topic was 9 months ago, but i think there is a g
I am ok with Java 8 as the requirement.
Gary
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 06:16 T. Schapitz wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> maybe a bit late in the game, because the original post regarding this
> topic was 9 months ago, but i think there is a good case for skipping
> directly to JDK 8:
>
> If we opt for utili
What about Java 5 to 8.
I'm current sat at Jax London and was the sole person who put their
hand up for Java 6, and next Conference I hope to have migrated
everything to at least Java 8. From the rest I saw 1 hand being raised
for Java 7, about 2/3rd's said Java 8 and 1/3rd said Java 11, with a
han
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 16:25, John Patrick wrote:
>
> What about Java 5 to 8.
> I'm current sat at Jax London and was the sole person who put their
> hand up for Java 6, and next Conference I hope to have migrated
> everything to at least Java 8. From the rest I saw 1 hand being raised
> for Java 7
+1
Am 09.10.2019 um 17:25 schrieb John Patrick:
What about Java 5 to 8.
I'm current sat at Jax London and was the sole person who put their
hand up for Java 6, and next Conference I hope to have migrated
everything to at least Java 8. From the rest I saw 1 hand being raised
for Java 7, about 2/3
On 09/10/2019 14:12, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to update Commons Exec from Java 5 to 6 to get it to build on Java
11.
Gary
Gary changed git master to update to 1.6 but travis was not able to
build for older JDKs.
I have tried following the recommended instructions for their trus
Regarding the question, it was by Simon Ritter (Azul Systems
previously Oracle previously Sun). "Put your hand up if your running
applications in production using Java X", started with Java 8, then
asked about 11, then 12 and 13, then asked 7 and then 6. Not sure if
he said Java 5 but I don't think
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 22:38, John Patrick wrote:
>
> Regarding the question, it was by Simon Ritter (Azul Systems
> previously Oracle previously Sun). "Put your hand up if your running
> applications in production using Java X", started with Java 8, then
> asked about 11, then 12 and 13, then aske
+1 for java 8
I just assume developers who still using java 6 do not care about
upgrading their commons too...
But what is the meaning of jigsawI mean, everybody use maven and
maven is good, right?
sebb 于2019年10月10日周四 上午6:55写道:
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 22:38, John Patrick wrote:
> >
> > Reg
d bad string lengths and was making to our
product to fail. The solution was to updated to a more modern JVM, but they
don't like to do it.
De: Xeno Amess
Enviado: jueves, 10 de octubre de 2019 8:16
Para: Commons Developers List
Asunto: Re: [exec] Update from
metimes calculated bad string lengths and was making to our
> product to fail. The solution was to updated to a more modern JVM, but they
> don't like to do it.
>
>
>
> De: Xeno Amess
> Enviado: jueves, 10 de octubre de 2019 8:16
> Para:
it.
> >
> >
> > ________
> > De: Xeno Amess
> > Enviado: jueves, 10 de octubre de 2019 8:16
> > Para: Commons Developers List
> > Asunto: Re: [exec] Update from Java 5 to 6
> >
> > +1 for java 8
> > I just assum
El 10/10/19 a las 12:50, sebb escribió:
> Please explain what you mean.
>
> Are you saying that code compiled with Java 5 will not run on Java 12+ ?
> Is not, why not?
Have you try to use JAI on OpenJDK 8 or Java 11/12/13 ?
You will find that reading/writing images fails, because it's using some
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 07:51, Luis Panadero Guardeño
wrote:
>
>
> El 10/10/19 a las 12:50, sebb escribió:
> > Please explain what you mean.
> >
> > Are you saying that code compiled with Java 5 will not run on Java 12+ ?
> > Is not, why not?
>
> Have you try to use JAI on OpenJDK 8 or Java 11/12/1
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:31 AM sebb wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 07:51, Luis Panadero Guardeño
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > El 10/10/19 a las 12:50, sebb escribió:
> > > Please explain what you mean.
> > >
> > > Are you saying that code compiled with Java 5 will not run on Java 12+
> ?
> > > Is not
15 matches
Mail list logo