On 02/06/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I just tried using the fixed numbers from a failed run (instead of
using random ones), and it fails every time with the following
settings:
runs=26
Lengths=12,12,28
So it's clearly some kind of
sebb wrote:
On 02/06/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I just tried using the fixed numbers from a failed run (instead of
using random ones), and it fails every time with the following
settings:
runs=26
Lengths=12,12,28
So it's clearly some kind of logic error -
On 02/06/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 02/06/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I just tried using the fixed numbers from a failed run (instead of
using random ones), and it fails every time with the
Sorry for top-post (degraded client ;)
My understanding - which I guess could be made clearer in tha javadoc
- is that clear is an operation on the *idle instance pool* and does
not affect instances checked out or pending requests (allocation
queue). Therefore, numActive should be unchanged by
Ah, OK, I had not realised the allocation queue was separate.
GOP does not have a numIdle count - it uses _pool.size() - so is probably OK.
GKOP has a _totalIdle field, but it looks like it is being maintained.
I'll try adding getNumIdle() ==0 checks after all clear() method calls.
On
On 01/06/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/06/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 01/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/06/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil
I just tried using the fixed numbers from a failed run (instead of
using random ones), and it fails every time with the following
settings:
runs=26
Lengths=12,12,28
So it's clearly some kind of logic error - looks like it occurs where
runs is an exact multiple of totalInstances.
The distribution looks good. If you have to make a 3rd release candidate
you may want to add a test on setConfig() and setFactory() in
GenericKeyedObjectPool to improve the coverage. But don't hold the
release for this.
Emmanuel Bourg
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Thanks to all who provided
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
thanks, sebb!
* Added link to release javadoc in site.xml
* Fixed
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
thanks, sebb!
Unfortunately not
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
thanks, sebb!
* Added link to release javadoc in
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
*
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
thanks, sebb!
* Added link to release javadoc in site.xml
* Fixed xml errors in changes.xml
*
22 matches
Mail list logo
