Hi!
From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
I'm not a big fan of that.
Me too, any decent logging facility should allow to configure the logger on a
per package level, so no problem to make the logging silent for a given
package.
I'd prefer to switch to SLF4J and just
On Mar 25, 2009, at 11:49 PM, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
if (log.isDebugEnabled())
{
log.debug(putFile: + file.getName());
}
with
logger.entry(file.getName());
This is not the same, in the second
I'm not a big fan of that. I prefer using Logback's and Log4j's
ability to include the class name, method name and line number in the
logging pattern. The overhead of that is not that large now that they
are both using the getStackTrace method to get the information. In
fact, I'd prefer to
