-Original Message-
From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 23:34
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [vfs] JDK 1.5
On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Guys,
looking at Ralph's comment in
https
Hi!
looking at Ralph's comment in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254
I am questionning myself, if there's any reason why vfs 2.0 should
still
have JDK 1.4 as requirement and not JDK 1.5.
If it is just me, I'd be happy to drop 1.4 dependency - Past votes were
declined. Probably
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 22:24
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [vfs] JDK 1.5
Guys,
looking at Ralph's comment in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254
I am questionning
On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Guys,
looking at Ralph's comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254
I am questionning myself, if there's any reason why vfs 2.0 should
still
have JDK 1.4 as requirement and not JDK 1.5. VFS 2.0 will be a major
release and JDK
