that's why I want to switch projects to projects-old and projects-new to
projects: be able to work on extracting documentation from projects-old and
updating it to match the new location
I proposed http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/projects.apache.org/data/ as
the new location of DOAP files l
I did some work on guessing algorithm for
https://projects-new.apache.org/releases.html
=> the release name is completely calculated from full file name found in /dist
That's the best I could do: not really extract version, but at least extract
release name
see [1] for more details on code
Notic
Ah, I missed the section down below. I was just seeing the large glowing
red message at the top. :)
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> On 2015-06-25 19:32, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
>> Ok, even after the changes Daniel made to the subversion auth file, I'm
>> still getting th
On 2015-06-25 19:32, Owen O'Malley wrote:
Ok, even after the changes Daniel made to the subversion auth file, I'm
still getting the same message on reporter.apache.org saying that Orc has
no committers or pmc members.
.. Owen
That is incorrect. It says that ORC has 5 PMC members and 12 commit
Ok, even after the changes Daniel made to the subversion auth file, I'm
still getting the same message on reporter.apache.org saying that Orc has
no committers or pmc members.
.. Owen
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> I didn't build the PMC/committer indexer, it's some old
And there is no rule (yet) that there is only one format to rule them
all. A transformation rule specified at project level in the reporter
tool could do the trick as well.
Martijn
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Alex,
> I think you made an assumption that "format" mean
Alex,
I think you made an assumption that "format" meant naming schemes of
releases, but it didn't. Simple "a defined way" to make that available for
reporter to pick it up with relative ease.
Your suggestion of a doap-based solution is equally a "format". The
important part, I think, is that "what
On 6/25/15, 7:18 AM, "hedh...@gmail.com on behalf of Niclas Hedhman"
wrote:
>If the "format" is published, and the "reward" of following it would be
>that the reporter picks it up automatically, it could lead to swift
>adoption ;-)
You might get push back about having to change naming schemes.
If the "format" is published, and the "reward" of following it would be
that the reporter picks it up automatically, it could lead to swift
adoption ;-)
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> It has been tried, and it did not work.
> People are too inconsistent across projects in
It has been tried, and it did not work.
People are too inconsistent across projects in how they name their
release files, grabbing the version is nigh impossible.
If we had some form of agreement on how to name files, then it would be
possible.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-06-25 15:11, Marti
Is there a reason why the reporter.a.o can send a message to a release
manager that it detected a new release, but is incapable of
determining a version number and release date?
Martijn
On 25 June 2015 at 13:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Le 25/06/2015 12:29, sebb a écrit :
>>
>> On 22 June 2015 at 15:21, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/21/2015 09:04 PM, sebb wrote:
As the subject says.
I'm having problems updating the releases for commons.
>>> We all
Le 25/06/2015 12:29, sebb a écrit :
On 22 June 2015 at 15:21, Rich Bowen wrote:
On 06/21/2015 09:04 PM, sebb wrote:
As the subject says.
I'm having problems updating the releases for commons.
We all are.
It's in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev
That's all very well, but not everyo
On 22 June 2015 at 15:21, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 06/21/2015 09:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> As the subject says.
>>
>> I'm having problems updating the releases for commons.
>>
>
> We all are.
>
> It's in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev
That's all very well, but not everyone has the knowl
On 25 June 2015 at 06:53, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> as main maintainer of current http://projects.apache.org/ (AFAIK), are you ok
> with switching the url to the new service and renaming current service to
> projects-old (to let use time to continue content migration withotu loosing
> anyth
15 matches
Mail list logo
