Re: ombudsman@ (was Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?)

2016-05-25 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Patch looks pretty straightforward Marvin. It may very well be. In fact, if it looks so straightforward you should be able to provide a diff in no time at all. Please do so at your earliest convenience. Thanks, Roman.

Re: ombudsman@ (was Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?)

2016-05-25 Thread Joe Schaefer
Actually it's more about senders with strict SPF rules that the qmail owner files will correct for.  It would be particularly bad for such email to get lost in transit. On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:16 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: Patch looks pretty straightforward Marvin.  However if we'r

Re: ombudsman@ (was Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?)

2016-05-25 Thread Joe Schaefer
Patch looks pretty straightforward Marvin.  However if we're going to use apache.org personal addresses, those volunteers should ask infrastructure to create qmail owner files for their accounts, to ensure that all emails sent from providers using DKIM and the like will be successfully delivered

Re: ombudsman@ (was Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?)

2016-05-25 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Joe Schaefer >> wrote: >>> ...We have options for phasing out president@, from simply using one of >>> Ross's personal addresses,

Re: ombudsman@ (was Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?)

2016-05-25 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Joe Schaefer > wrote: >> ...We have options for phasing out president@, from simply using one of >> Ross's personal addresses, to creating a dedicated alias of the >> ombuds(man)@ variety... Th

Re: Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?

2016-05-25 Thread Frans Badenhorst
Thank you Chris I will contact Jane Wyngaard and see if ee can get it going. The is no doubt a need here for it. Kind regards Frans Badenhorst On 22 May 2016 19:45, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Thank Frans. You may want to contact Jane Wyngaard about this

Re: Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?

2016-05-25 Thread Sharan Foga
I think that we'll find that there will be some recurring common themes whatever under-represented group we want to attract. I think the hardest thing will be knowing what questions to ask that people will want to answer. People may not want to answer things (anonymous or not) that they think

Re: ApacheCon audio processing: Instructions

2016-05-25 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Rich, Two more rooms for Wed done at the same location [1] (previous mail in thread). Will check the one for Thu with question marks. Cheers, Hadrian On 05/18/2016 09:59 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: Hi Rich, Please find the Thu talks here [1]. Please mark them as done in the spreadsheet so w

Re: No Unicode Feather?

2016-05-25 Thread Nick Burch
On Tue, 24 May 2016, Christopher wrote: This is a somewhat serious question (but only somewhat). Does anybody know what the process would be like to petition for a feather (ASF or otherwise) emoji in unicode? Has anybody tried doing this? A few months ago I went to a very interesting short tal