Hello Fon,
please also check GSOC ideas page: https://s.apache.org/gsoc2019ideas
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 05:06, Fon Lawrence wrote:
>
> Thanks Rafael,
> I will look into it immediately.
>
> Regards
> Lawrence
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:35 PM Rafael Cruz
> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm quite
Thanks Rafael,
I will look into it immediately.
Regards
Lawrence
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:35 PM Rafael Cruz
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm quite new in the community, same as you. I'm sure that you've read it,
> in any case, I put you here several links that helped me to understand a
> little bit how
Hi Comdev,
I had to reboot community-vm. It had run out of memory and was causing problems
with our monitoring and config management. I added an additional 5GB of ram
(3->8GB) so it should be good now.
-Chris
-
To
Hi!
I'm quite new in the community, same as you. I'm sure that you've read it,
in any case, I put you here several links that helped me to understand a
little bit how it works.
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
http://www.apache.org/dev/contributors.html
sebb wrote on 2019-02-18 11:22:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 19:19, Manfred Moser wrote:
>>
>> Ultimately I think the only way you can move the needle on this is by
>>
>> 1. talking about it like you did
>>
>> 2. making it happen - e.g. you could just start with your own project, agree
>> in your
Julian asked:
> Re. "owning our data": we do own our source code but what about all
> the conversational metadata in GH? In the Subversion project we have
> a GH mirror of the code but pull requests and code comments etc. in
> GH aren't even copied to the Subversion PMC mailing lists, apart
>
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 19:19, Manfred Moser wrote:
>
> Ultimately I think the only way you can move the needle on this is by
>
> 1. talking about it like you did
>
> 2. making it happen - e.g. you could just start with your own project, agree
> in your PM group to mirror to gitlab and then adapt
Ultimately I think the only way you can move the needle on this is by
1. talking about it like you did
2. making it happen - e.g. you could just start with your own project, agree in
your PM group to mirror to gitlab and then adapt your processes
In the end .. imho it doesnt matter where you
Hi everyone,
Am Fon Lawrence Che. A computer science student from the University of
Buea, Cameroon.
I am comfortable with Java and of recent I started learning the spring
framework. I also have basic knowledge in javascript.
I will love to start contributing to the community and I will also
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:51 PM Julian Foad wrote:
> Jorge Betancourt wrote:
> > [...] Like Rich said
> > there is a great value on being reachable to outside contributors, [...]
>
> That's illusory. GitLab isn't hard to reach. Should we have suggested 20
> years ago that our infrastructure
On 2/18/19 12:54 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
>> Gitlab is MIT licensed, and the presumption from this thread is that we
>> would host it ourselves [...]
>
> Correction: *could* host it ourselves -- if we wanted or needed to. I
> explicitly didn't presume that we would.
>
Ah.
Rich Bowen wrote:
> Gitlab is MIT licensed, and the presumption from this thread is that we
> would host it ourselves [...]
Correction: *could* host it ourselves -- if we wanted or needed to. I
explicitly didn't presume that we would.
--
- Julian
Jorge Betancourt wrote:
> [...] Like Rich said
> there is a great value on being reachable to outside contributors, [...]
That's illusory. GitLab isn't hard to reach. Should we have suggested 20 years
ago that our infrastructure should be primarily Microsoft tools because they
were familiar to
On 2/18/19 12:38 PM, Austin Bennett wrote:
> Not taking a stance on any migration; can't help but wondering: What
> prevents GitLab from getting to the point where GitHub is now and in the
> future an equivalent push is to be suggested to move away from GitLab?
Gitlab is MIT licensed, and
Sorry, I've misread the initial email. I'll double check if there is a
missing project in Wikipedia.
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
пн, 18 февр. 2019 г. в 20:32, Dmitriy Pavlov :
> Hi Rich,
>
> The task is still in the list of help-wanted service here
>
Not taking a stance on any migration; can't help but wondering: What
prevents GitLab from getting to the point where GitHub is now and in the
future an equivalent push is to be suggested to move away from GitLab?
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:23 AM Jorge Betancourt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is true
Hi Rich,
The task is still in the list of help-wanted service here
https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?0b349bee48c7e47a20fb29222b8217fa61b11d31
Should I mark it as done?
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
пн, 18 февр. 2019 г. в 17:05, Rich Bowen :
> Has anyone verified where we are on this task,
Hi,
It is true that Github is, at the end of the day, a commercial entity, and
that we're placing valuable metadata, regarding the changes that eventually
will end up being maintained by the members of our projects. Like Rich said
there is a great value on being reachable to outside contributors,
On 2/18/19 9:30 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Thanks for your comments, Rich.
>
> Re. "owning our data": we do own our source code but what about all the
> conversational metadata in GH? In the Subversion project we have a GH mirror
> of the code but pull requests and code comments etc. in GH
Thanks for your comments, Rich.
Re. "owning our data": we do own our source code but what about all the
conversational metadata in GH? In the Subversion project we have a GH mirror of
the code but pull requests and code comments etc. in GH aren't even copied to
the Subversion PMC mailing
On 2/18/19 9:13 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Every time I use GitHub I am supporting proprietary software and silo systems.
>
> Every time I use GitLab I am supporting open source software and open systems.
>
> I don't see the ASF's values being upheld by encouraging our projects to use
>
Every time I use GitHub I am supporting proprietary software and silo systems.
Every time I use GitLab I am supporting open source software and open systems.
I don't see the ASF's values being upheld by encouraging our projects to use
GitHub. To me it's equivalent to encouraging our members and
Has anyone verified where we are on this task, recently? I think we may
already have done this, and, if so, we really should drop this task from
the list. Can someone take a moment to verify where we stand on this?
Perhaps even one of the people who has said they want to help with the task?
23 matches
Mail list logo
