Our website footers proclaim content contained there are licensed under ALv2
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:02 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> FWIW, I asked this question years ago, and never got a clear answer. I
> think they are HJTI (http://drbacchus.com/hjti) but the real answer is
> that they do not ha
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:15 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> I've made two posts on this list in the past couple of days regarding
> the rising ACL effort and my concerns about it.
>
> I *desperately* want this kind of grass-roots enthusiast community
> effort. I do NOT want to kill it. But I've learned f
This is a 2 hour drive from my house, so provided ComDev doesn't mind
a non-ComDev-er participating, I'm happy to show up.
--David
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:05 AM Bob Paulin wrote:
>
> I'd be willing to help with this as well. I'll be speaking there so
> just let me know how I can be of help.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose setting up an official ASF swag store. I recently
> came across RedBubble [1] who produce stuff through geographically
> distributed agents so the post costs remain reasonable world-wide.
>
Have you ordered anything
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Guido Serra wrote:
> Hi,
> at my current employer we are trying to define the Way of Working.
>
> The company is distributed across 3 major timezones, 4/5h aparts from each
> others.
> We do have multiple projects and we are trying to define a model of ownership
>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
> Hi Bertrand
>
> Am .01.2017, 15:03 Uhr, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz
> :
>
>> Hi Raphael,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Raphael Bircher
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...Has anybody ever used crowd funding to cover development costs?...
>>
>>
>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote on 11/18/16 11:47 AM:
>> Do we have a place to track tasks/tickets for ComDev? The doc was
>> intended for brainstorming, but I don't think we really want to use it
>> as a long-term todo list.
>
> https://issues.apache.or
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
> Why Puppet? The Jenkins stuff is done via Ansible.
> Multiple automatisation tools?
>
The Jenkins stuff that was done in Ansible was done by a volunteer,
who chose to use Ansible because it was something he knew, even though
we had pupp
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> This whole process is nonsense
In general I agree - CoCoMo is the worst model for valuation (except
for all of the others)
>
> What is important is what economic value does the code produce. If we look at
> it that way I'd say our code (and
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Thanks Daniel,
>
> Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense.
>
> By "delegating read/write access to the new repos" do you mean the ComDev
> owned admin account will assign individual project admin rights to the
> relevant PMC upon r
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:38 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>>> I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way
>>> that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this
>
gt; Finally we'll need to read over the FAQ to update appropriately (I can do
> that) - http://community.apache.org/apache-extras/faq.html
>
> Ross
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:ke4...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 9:09 AM
> To:
The Solaris zone has been deprecated (but still works), but please
don't use that. (Not that you could use docker with it anyway)
INFRA-8771 is tracking the new VM for use by ComDev, though I suspect
there are actually several comdev VMs (projects-new for instance runs
on a new VM)
--David
On Wed
None that I am aware of.
A number of projects are using Travis, showing the results of that
doesn't seem to be obviously problematic.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is anybody aware of any (legal) problems if projects use services like
> Travis CI [1] or covera
> It seems there is confusion over who owns the decision. Happy for it to be
> ComDev if you are happy from infra perspective.
>
> Ross
>
> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: David Nalley
It is my understanding that moving to SF from Google Code is a ComDev
decision. I have interacted with SF and then brought the PoCs they've
done here, but AFAIK, no decision has been made.
--David
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Ahhh... I see no that's just
SSL
Specifically - apache.org sites are in https-everywhere. Those sites
can't provide SSL.
None of the current TLP web sites are being served from Apache
hardware though - it's all VMs in 2-3 different cloud providers.
--David
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> The gi
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
> wrote:
>> Who said we allow it for engineers? My position is the same for any
>> community member no matter what they do.
>
> It is all over LI and resumes. Here's a good examp
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:35 AM, wrote:
> Could the ASF not simply run a GitHub Enterprise server ?
>
No, but for varying reasons.
We've discussed GH Enterprise server, and one of the licensing points
is that you can't expose GH Enterprise Server publicly. Even in our
discussions with them, that
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Opening a new thread...
>
> Git without Github is like sex without a partner, sufficient but not very
> satisfactory. Github option has been explored in the past, and due to
> various reasons, it was not possible to achieve.
>
> But, during
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Christopher wrote:
> All,
>
> Has any thought been put into leveraging GitHub pages for project
> documentation, static site hosting? A lot of www.apache.org is simple
> static content, as are project pages. Since a lot of projects are now using
> git, and we mirror
F provided
>> services for essential items.
>>
>> What has been unclear is what are these essential items and what can our
>> projects expect from the ASF in the non-essential areas. David Nalley and
>> I, as part of our budget planning, are working on identifying wha
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> over at the Apache Commons Project, we have a long discussion about our
> mailing lists. Are they to noisy? Should they be splitted up into sublists?
> Should individual components go TLP?
> IMHO Ben McCann summed up the core pr
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:24 AM, jay vyas wrote:
> IS the ASF okay with simply doing a one time commit to SVN, of a single
> HTML page which forwards to gh-pages?
>
I am pretty sure there is a brand requirement that the project's web
site is at $foo.a.o -
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pm
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> If there is sufficient demand, however, that could change - the code that
> would make this possible does exist.
>
> I would like to express demand from the Flink project. svn is a pain to use
> (since we host javadocs and our docume
>
> As for timing, it's now. But if you only have time to show up at the BOF and
> share your experience that will be appreciated.
>
Ahh - My takeaway from the email was that the ask was for organizing a BoF.
What is it that you need help with?
--David
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> I know we have a bunch of people who already volunteer to teach in schools. I
> know that this has a great deal of impact at many levels. I'm looking for
> volunteers to help with a potential new initiative.
>
> In the run-up t
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Great David,
>
>Does it make sense to have the right panel (Staff Picks, top downloads,
> etc) be restricted to Apache Extras related projects ? I'll let others
> comment on the adds portion of the prototype.
Frankly, I don't know, or
Hi folks:
Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for
the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below.
Comments/Input welcome.
https://sourceforge.net/directory/vertical:Apache-Extras/
--David
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Agreed: How we got here is nice; where we are going (and
> where we *should* be going) is better :)
>
Yes!
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>
>> I agree. The only link on the front page (homepage) of apache.org that
>> comes in the neighbourhood of events is the conferences link. And this goes
>> to a page that is shows a lot of information
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Eric Schultz
wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm trying to understand to the Apache Foundation model of voting in the
> commit-then-review system. If a project is running on a CTR system and
> someone says they dislike a piece of a previous commit, what happens? Does
> it require
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 21/05/2014 jan iversen wrote:
>>
>> It would also be nice to hear a keynote about "who are we today", we all
>> know our "own" projects, but currently ASF consist of soo many projects
>> that I think most of us lost track. Hopefully some
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:03 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 30 April 2014 04:19, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> It's asked for approval on TM@, but AFAIK no approval has been granted.
>>
>
> Meaning they got a denial, or simply no response ? In the latter case I can
> underst
It's asked for approval on TM@, but AFAIK no approval has been granted.
--David
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Are we aware of this event: http://apacheindia.org/
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
>
Maybe Andrew Bayer instead of me. He is a core committer on Jenkins
(which has a strong affinity for CD); and jclouds moves faster.
CloudStack isn't really a CD type of project - at least not yet.
--David
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 03/11/2014 08:4
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> It might be more interesting to skip Cordova altogether. The industry
> is full of ferment about CD. If everyone checks their rhetoric at the
> door, there could be an interesting conversation about how to mesh the
> ideas of CD and the id
Copying Megan this time.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi Megan:
>
> Thanks for the well documented request. As an all-volunteer
> organization it will likely take us several days to get you a
> meaningful response; but I wanted to at least acknowledge t
Hi Megan:
Thanks for the well documented request. As an all-volunteer
organization it will likely take us several days to get you a
meaningful response; but I wanted to at least acknowledge the request.
I appreciate the respect you folks are showing towards the ASF marks.
--David
On Thu, Feb 20,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> All,
>
> Please have a look at http://tm3.org/cfpreview Community tab.
>
> We currently have 19 talks that have been marked as 'Accept' in the CFP
> system, and I would like to fit this content into 18 sessions. I'd like some
> feedback on what
40 matches
Mail list logo
