SSL Specifically - apache.org sites are in https-everywhere. Those sites can't provide SSL.
None of the current TLP web sites are being served from Apache hardware though - it's all VMs in 2-3 different cloud providers. --David On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: > The github pages I've worked on have all been in Markdown, so they're > portable. > > I also don't see any reason why we can't host pages elsewhere since we > control the source repositories. > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) > <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: >> Is it really necessary for our web pages to be served from Apache hardware? >> If so, why? >> >> I understand why we want to control the canonical source, but do we really >> need to own web server? >> >> A concern, for me, would be if hosting on GitHub Pages meant that we could >> not easily switch to another host. >> >> Ross >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 9:40 AM >> To: dev@community.apache.org >> Subject: Re: GitHub Pages >> >> Chris, >> >> The easy summary is that Apache would like to keep apache sites being served >> by apache controlled hardware. >> >> Github serving pages fails that test. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > I think those other comments about Jekyll had to do with keeping all >>> > of the site storage on apache servers. >>> > >>> > >>> I'm not sure I understand how Jekyll affects that. Are we concerned >>> that GitHub will not render the site's source accurately? And, if so, >>> wouldn't that concern extend to non-Jekyll static sources also? >>> >>> >>> > There have been objections in this thread about using github.io >>> > based sites even with site name masquerading. >>> > >>> > >>> Does anybody wish to summarize those? I think it would be helpful. >>> >>> >>> > Sent from my iPhone >>> > >>> > > On Mar 6, 2015, at 14:36, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Regarding some of the other comments about jekyll... it's not true >>> > > that >>> > you >>> > > need jekyll. You can publish plain HTML or Markdown also. >>> > >>>
