On 2022/12/08 20:30:02 Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>...
> Bu t I mentioned, I get your point. Would you be less concerned with a domain
> like asf.social, since this is not an official domain? Assuming asf.social
> would be only for ASF community, but also allow "offical" accounts like
> press@as
On 2022/11/07 14:32:29 Peter Hunsberger wrote:
>...
> It could give provenance to a set of social media handles for legitimate
> Apache Foundation members, validating representation and preventing
> imposters. Not sure how much that's needed but I have seen some
discussion
> on these lists about t
ot lead to an obvious owner.
Also please note that a mailing list named healthc...@apache.org was
requested. Infra has deleted that request. Please keep requests within
the @community space.
Cheers,
Greg Stein
Infrastructure Administrator, ASF
--
FYI
-- Forwarded message -
From: 'sttaylor' via Google Summer of Code Announce <
google-summer-of-code-annou...@googlegroups.com>
Date: Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:51 PM
Subject: GSoC Announcement: Announcing Google Summer of Code 2021
To: Google Summer of Code Announce <
google-summer
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:54 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
>...
> One of the things on my Apache To Do list, which starts at the
> expiration of my board term (Next week!) is to "visit" each of our
> projects and update a list of things, which includes:
>
> * Ensure that https://whimsy.apache.org/site/ is
;
> thx for the work on the tool -- I assume it is you.
>
> Claude
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 2:55 PM Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:52:09AM -0800, Dave Fisher wrote:
> > > Several projects did not report their recent releases in the last
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:52:09AM -0800, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Several projects did not report their recent releases in the last
> Board cycle. It would be good if the reporter tool would make it
> easier to provide the information.
When I was young, we'd write reports by-hand, while walking throu
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 4:04 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>>
>> The folks with high quality stuff have historically (~10 years ago)
>> required huge minimum orders.
>>
>
> Not so much any more. I have gotten very nice stickers from Sticke
Every single question that I answered gave me a "not quite right". Even
when it asked if an Apache product can be distributed under Cat-X and I
said "No", it said "not quite right". That was a simple yes/no, and an
obvious "no" answer. ... That was the final straw after a series of
multiple-choice
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Sorry for my vagueness but this is important and you went left while i
> went right on the topic.
>
Your most appropriate venue is legal-discuss@, and just that one list.
-g
incredibly wide range of your To: header and minimize the
subject line shouting, if there is something specific needed. It is also
unwise to cross-post across private and public lists.
Regards,
Greg Stein
Infrastructure Administrator, ASF
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Th
Ugh. I suggest that ComDev write up some text explaining why this is a
horrible idea :-(
https://github.com/blog/2392-introducing-code-owners
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Jacques Le Roux
> > wrote:
> >> Who will update the https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html
> page?*
> >
> > I've done that, it no
gt; I'll be going to sleep now and will check again in a few hours.
>
> Worst case we go without you. Kindly advise.
>
> Thanks,
> Sally
>
> [From the mobile; please excuse top-posting, spelling/spacing errors, and
> brevity]
>
> - Reply message -
> From
x27;t want to be quoted, that's OK; I can use Ross as backup.
>
> Thanks so much,
>
> Sally
>
>
> From: Greg Stein
> To: Sally Khudairi
> Cc: Ulrich Stärk ; "pr...@apache.org" ;
> "dev@community.apache.org"
> Sent: Friday, 13 March 2015, 17:22
&
The very first year was 2005. Thus, 2015 would be the 11th GSoC.
As one of the two people to launch/create GSoC, you can call me
authoritative on the dates :-P
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Sally Khudairi wrote:
> What?
>
> Really? I had it in the "Did You Know?" section last week as 10
Heya peeps... could community.a.o please do something about the deprecated
community@apache mailing list? I would suggest it becomes an alias for
dev@community (and its archive just moves into stasis).
(I haven't filed Infra tickets to fix, since it should be decided by y'all
first...)
m to fork the code you want and release that. Then you can
> depend on the non-ASF fork of the ASF project... again a rude option, but
> perhaps less so than #1
>
> I vote you go for #2. It plays best with community which is what we are
> here to foster
>
>
> On 25 July 2
[adding dev@community, as I believe this should go there...]
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Vincent Hennebert
wrote:
>...
> Hi,
>
> there's an undergoing debate in the XML Graphics project about doing
> a release that has a dependency on a snapshot version of another
> (Apache, for that matter
The budget may be available, but are the videos actually worth that
value? "Just because we have budget, doesn't mean we have to spend
it."
Geez. 15k euros is a LOT of money.
Opportunity cost... some new hardware? Maybe another part-time infra admin?
The question of "can we get these recorded?"
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 16:55, Benson Margulies wrote:
>...
>> Personally I feel that GSoC students should earn commit access just
>> like anyone else.
>
> I have a lot of sympathy for Greg's position. Treating 'committer' as
> a single monolithic category drives people away.
Right. It is necessa
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:24, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> It looks like various Apache projects are voting GSoC students as
>> "partial committers". As Apache does not have a formal process for
>> handling this type of account r
Hey all,
With some recent emails, it became clear that we may not be giving
people the right background to PMC nominations/additions. The current
text is here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newpmc
There is a fundamental, conceptual change needed in that paragraph.
The short answer is that
Hi ComDev!
A couple days ago, I wrote a message to somebody describing some of
the process that the Board uses for its meetings. I thought this may
be a helpful start for you guys to write about "How the Board Works".
I've snipped/summarized commentary from the other person, but left in
my text i
24 matches
Mail list logo
