Anjana G Bhattacharjee wrote:
Have just come across a curious parallel to this, perhaps, in the arena of
Golf tournament sponsorship - IBM sponsored "the Masters" (i.e. men's only)
tournament in April this year with a flurry of justification [1] whilst this
weekend's "Women's British Open" was
, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Jean T. Anderson <mailto:j...@bristowhill.com>> wrote:
Can we add a task that Jira to either remove the wiki
(http://wiki.apache.org/Women/) or make it readonly? or do we
need a new Jira request?
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
...The vote shows consensus
for an autoresponder so I'll ask for that
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2883
-Bertrand
Can we add a task that Jira to either remove the wiki
Anjana G Bhattacharjee wrote:
Just keep the channel open - how
much is it costing us to run? Is the workload to heavy and need it be
rotated every few years or so to keep it alive?
I'm an active moderator for women@ and the workload is not onerous, but
it does exist, and both the list and the
Benson Margulies wrote:
There's a small potential that someone could misunderstand one thing
in Jean's message, so I want to make what I see as a clearer statement
of one point.
Mailing lists of the form priv...@somepmc.apache.org \are/ archived.
Those archives are \not/ available to the general
Ross Gardler wrote:
On Oct 28th 2009 I made the women@ list aware of the opportunity to
revitalize the women@ objectives through comdev [1]. Specifically I
said "The wo...@a.o list has not really gone anywhere, but maybe this
is another chance to look at the lack of female representation here
s, missed your point, which
was responding directly to what he wrote. I hate it when that happens
:-) but no harm done.
regards,
-jean
Best, A
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Jean T. Anderson <mailto:j...@bristowhill.com>> wrote:
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Thanks -- that&#x
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Thanks -- that's a terrific suggestion to auto-respond that women@
activity has moved to d...@community. If this vote passes, I'll check
with infra@ to see if an an auto-responder can be set up.
d'oh! I was guilty of being distracted and not reading cl
[x] +1 let's dot it
-jean
Anjana G Bhattacharjee wrote:
-1 (unbinding)
because this vote, and the "dot it" slip, reminds me of a problem of
relevance when "dotting the i's and crossing the t's" when framing any vote,
so to speak
in this case, would suggest that there may be a significant difference
between the options o
Ross Gardler wrote:
On 1 Jul 2010, at 16:19, "Jean T. Anderson" wrote:
Ping -- is there energy to roll women@ into d...@community?
It depends on what kind of energy you are looking for. If you are looking for
someone to restart the women@ issues and those issues are about
Kathey Marsden wrote:
On 7/1/2010 8:19 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Ping -- is there energy to roll women@ into d...@community?
Hi Jean,
I am sure I sent a mail to women@ proposing we do this and received no
objections and had seen no mail since, but now for some reason I don't
see it i
Ping -- is there energy to roll women@ into d...@community?
thanks,
-jean
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Jean T. Anderson
wrote:
| I would like to send a mail to wo...@apache.org suggesting
| conversations that might "nor
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
| I would like to send a mail to wo...@apache.org suggesting
| conversations that might "normally" go to that list be rolled into this
| one as a central list to discuss all inclusion an
Hi, all, I just joined this list and quickly scanned the archives, so
may have missed a post -- my apologies in advance if I did.
Back in December, Kathey posted [1]:
| I would like to send a mail to wo...@apache.org suggesting
| conversations that might "normally" go to that list be rolled in
15 matches
Mail list logo
