rbowen merged PR #9:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/9
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
rbowen opened a new pull request, #9:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/9
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
+1 for Advisor.
Succinct and accurate.
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 18:59, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> Thanks, Gary!
>
> I agree. Advisors is really good. A PMC, or even a single PMC member, can ask
> for advice when they have doubts. and unsolicited advice can be ignored if
> not concise and
Hi Rashi,
First of all welcome and thank you for your contribution.
You can contact the Apache Dubbo developers at d...@dubbo.apache.org.
I'm not part of their community but it seems they manage their website in
Github as most of the projects currently do.
You can create a ticket and pull request
Hello Everyone i want to contribute to apache dubbo's website i.e
https://dubbo.apache.org/en/
i want to fix the footer ! it can be my good first issue to open
source organisations aswell!
please let me know how i can contribute to the fixation of the website.
thanking you,
Rashi Arora
Hi Gary,
I like the name "Advisor" since to me it has no negative associations.
By the way, in reviewing project board reports, I often see projects that
recognize and report on areas of improvement, and that would welcome having an
Advisor try to help them.
Craig
> On Feb 18, 2024, at
Hi -
Thanks, Gary!
I agree. Advisors is really good. A PMC, or even a single PMC member, can ask
for advice when they have doubts. and unsolicited advice can be ignored if not
concise and actionable.
Best,
Dave
> On Feb 18, 2024, at 8:19 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Based on
>
Hi All,
Based on
https://github.com/rbowen/comdev-working-groups/tree/main/wg-sharpeners#readme
I read:
- volunteers who come alongside a PMC to offer an outsider's
perspective on the project, and advice to build their community.
- subscribe to the project's mailing lists and mostly listen
-
rbowen merged PR #8:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/8
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
rbowen opened a new pull request, #8:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/8
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
> On Feb 18, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I've never heard of someone being called a "sharpener"; I've used a
> knife sharpener and a pencil sharpener ;-) ... it feels like a stretch
> here.
>
> In general, I prefer names that simply describe intent instead of
>
I've never heard of someone being called a "sharpener"; I've used a
knife sharpener and a pencil sharpener ;-) ... it feels like a stretch
here.
In general, I prefer names that simply describe intent instead of
cuteness/cleverness, especially in an international context where I
find it beneficial
I'm not tied to either the name or the alliteration. I thought it was cute.
I honestly don't see the antagonistic overtones, but I'll take your word
for it.
I also don't relish the naming debate. I suppose every name has
implications for someone.
I'll defer to whatever folks want to call it.
> On 18 Feb 2024, at 01:13, sebb wrote:
>
> Sorry, but I find the name 'Sharpeners' antagonistic and aggressive.
> To me it sounds like a group gearing up for a fight.
>
> Having names that are alliterative is all very well, but I don't think
> it should be at the expense of a name that has
14 matches
Mail list logo
