Re: Jake woes

+1 Grunt On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote: > I've burned quite a bit of time trying to get it to work, and I'm a bit > realizing that it's probably not worth continuing. By fiddling with > dependencies I can get it to run, but tasks are being run multiple times > when they s

Re: Review Request: Fixing exec bug.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12013/#review9 --- framework/src/org/apache/cordova/api/PluginManager.java

Re: Cordova Blog

Currently, PhoneGap aggregates the blog posts of many committers at phonegap.com/blog. The downside of this is that it's an Adobe blog, and it's not Apache Cordova. Apache Cordova should probably have its own blog, but I see a lot of the same content being in two different places. If someone wan

Jake woes

I've burned quite a bit of time trying to get it to work, and I'm a bit realizing that it's probably not worth continuing. By fiddling with dependencies I can get it to run, but tasks are being run multiple times when they shouldn't be, and there's no reason I should need to fiddle the deps to get

Cordova Blog

I brought it up in a separate thread ( http://callback.markmail.org/thread/y44pmva6gfm257sl) but probably deserves its own. I'd like to create a Blog for Cordova and make all Committers able to post to it. We could use it to: - Post release announcements & release notes - Draw attention to depreca

PhoneGap Day tickets

Do I (or other committers thinking of attending) need to buy a ticket?

Re: Multiple plugins with the same dependencies

There is dependency support built into plugman / plugins. So your developers would only need to install the two plugins - the third shared one would be installed automatically. See the element of the spec [1]. As for your example about two plugins relying on the same third party plugin, as long a

Re: BB10 bundling of node.js

Node is not the problem. But different versions of Node is a problem. On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Wargo, John wrote: > The way the market is going, node becomes more and more common. I don't think > it's inappropriate to expect node to be there (provided you tell them it's a > requirement)

RE: Multiple plugins with the same dependencies

That's what we thought - perhaps make a plugin out of the common dependency, but that becomes more to manage. I'd have to install three plugins to make this work when developers are going to expect that plugman manages this for them. What happens for example if two non-related plugins rely upo

RE: BB10 bundling of node.js

The way the market is going, node becomes more and more common. I don't think it's inappropriate to expect node to be there (provided you tell them it's a requirement). It's already one for the CLI, right? John M. Wargo SAP | Charlotte, NC | USA Office: +1 704.321.0265 | Mobile: +1 704.249.7476

RE: suggested change to "platform ls" command

I think cordova platforms by itself is enough. Why not leave ls but respond correctly if ls isn't included on the command line. John M. Wargo SAP | Charlotte, NC | USA Office: +1 704.321.0265 | Mobile: +1 704.249.7476 Email: john.wa...@sap.com Twitter: @johnwargo -Original Message- Fro

Re: Review Request: Fixing exec bug.

> On June 20, 2013, 8:28 p.m., Braden Shepherdson wrote: > > framework/src/org/apache/cordova/api/PluginManager.java, line 220 > > > > > > I realize these logs are at a high verbosity level (DEBUG). Are they > > inten

Re: Review Request: Fixing exec bug.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12013/#review22184 --- framework/src/org/apache/cordova/api/PluginManager.java

Re: Review Request: Fixing exec bug.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12014/ --- (Updated June 20, 2013, 8:18 p.m.) Review request for cordova and Andrew Grieve

Review Request: Fixing exec bug.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12014/ --- Review request for cordova and Andrew Grieve. Description --- Fixing exec

Re: Review Request: Fixing exec bug.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12013/ --- (Updated June 20, 2013, 8:16 p.m.) Review request for cordova and Andrew Grieve

Review Request: Fixing exec bug.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12013/ --- Review request for cordova. Description --- Fixing exec bug. This addres

Re: Multiple plugins with the same dependencies

I think the correct approach here would be to create a plugin that only provides SDMCommon-2.3.0.183.jar, and then have your other plugins depend on it. On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > The file collision checking is built in. > > A -f / --force flag would need to be implemen

Re: Apache VM for Medic's CouchDB

Great, I created the INFRA issue here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6422 On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Anis KADRI wrote: > Should we use this for our NPM registry as well ? > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > > > Right on. Thanks for taking this on M

Re: Multiple plugins with the same dependencies

The file collision checking is built in. A -f / --force flag would need to be implemented to support this case. There are a set of common file methods handling things like copying stuff over, deleting files, that kind of stuff [1]. These helper methods all have built-in checking that the source o

Re: Reviewboard

Cool, thanks for the info! I've registered. On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Andrew Grieve wrote: > Just got word that all of the repos except for the plugin ones are now > valid targets at http://reviews.apache.org. > > 1. Everyone will have to make a reviewboard account > 2. Make sure to add

Multiple plugins with the same dependencies

We¹re trying to install two plugins that share some of the same dependencies and we¹re getting an error. Is there a way to turn off checking if a file already exists? If not, do you have any suggestions on how to implement this? Error: "C:\temp\plug\test\libs\SDMCommon-2.3.0.183.jar" alread

Re: Apache VM for Medic's CouchDB

Should we use this for our NPM registry as well ? On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > Right on. Thanks for taking this on Mike. > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Lorin Beer > wrote: > > that would be fantastic! > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Filip Maj wrote

Re: Media API, DataResource, and empty URLs

WebView.getUrl() ? On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Braden Shepherdson wrote: > So the current state of handling URLs in DataResource is: if it has a > scheme, all good; if it doesn't and is absolute, also good; if it is > relative and has no scheme, throw new IllegalArgumentException. > > I agr

Re: Opinions Needed: Platform specific features and mobilespec tests

My 2 cents - APIs that should exist on all devices go in mobile spec - Platform specific ones go in each platforms repo I assume this is a vanishing issue as all mobile spec test will be broken out into each plugin repo, and would be easily run by mobile spec. Cheers, Jesse Sent from my iPhone

Re: Opinions Needed: Platform specific features and mobilespec tests

+1 On 13-06-20 9:06 AM, "Andrew Grieve" wrote: >Definitely torn on this one. On one hand, if there are features >implemented >on some platforms that should be implemented on others than having them >fail is a constant reminder that your platform needs to implement the >missing functionality. OTO

Re: BB10 bundling of node.js

Those dependencies are, as I recently noted elsewhere, artificially high. I think 0.8.6 or so is sufficient if we switch to using os.tmpDir() (the 0.8 name for it, and a synonym for the new, 0.10 name os.tmpdir()). Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > Plugman and cordova-

Re: Media API, DataResource, and empty URLs

So the current state of handling URLs in DataResource is: if it has a scheme, all good; if it doesn't and is absolute, also good; if it is relative and has no scheme, throw new IllegalArgumentException. I agree that this behavior is dumb and there should be a sane default for relative URLs, and Da

Re: Opinions Needed: Platform specific features and mobilespec tests

Definitely torn on this one. On one hand, if there are features implemented on some platforms that should be implemented on others than having them fail is a constant reminder that your platform needs to implement the missing functionality. OTOH, things like camera clean-up are meant to be platform

Re: Review Request: cordova.VERSION.js -> cordova.js

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11312/#review22163 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Shazron Abdullah On May 21, 2013, 4:17 p.m.,

Reviewboard

Just got word that all of the repos except for the plugin ones are now valid targets at http://reviews.apache.org. 1. Everyone will have to make a reviewboard account 2. Make sure to add yourself to the cordova group (via the "My Account" link) 3. There's a command-line tool for posting reviews th

Opinions Needed: Platform specific features and mobilespec tests

One issue I ran with respects to the mobile spec is some tests are only applicable to certain device types. We have a couple options when it comes to those types of tests: 1. Not include them in the automated tests 2. Include them knowing that they *might* cause failures with certain device ty

Security Error in FirefoxOS on reading window.navigator properties

I came to a point where I need to use the group wisdom. In https://github.com/apache/cordova-firefoxos/blob/master/lib/cordova.firefoxos.js#L5929 Cordova is trying to replace window.navigator with something which looks like a copy of itself. window.navigator is protected in FirefoxOS - even bro

Re: Apache VM for Medic's CouchDB

Right on. Thanks for taking this on Mike. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Lorin Beer wrote: > that would be fantastic! > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Filip Maj wrote: > >> Would love to see this, thanks for taking the initiative on this Mike! >> >> On 6/19/13 7:19 AM, "Andrew Grieve" w

Re: BB10 bundling of node.js

I'm a fan of shipping dependencies shrink wrapped but as mentioned this is not generally done at Apache. (Except for when it is like Maven.) I wonder if there's a bootstrap way we could look at? One less install step, and assurance of a sane (or at least expected) runtime is nice. On Wed, Jun 19