Github user falkobuttler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-inappbrowser/pull/136#issuecomment-173542915
This PR caused a major outage for our Android users due to the fact that
the LOAD_START event does not fire anymore. We relied on that event
GitHub user vladimir-kotikov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/251
CB-10157 Uninstall app from device/emulator only when signed apk is already
installed
JIRA: [CB-10157](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10157)
You can merge this pull
Github user vladimir-kotikov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/248#issuecomment-173500760
The second fix LGTM.
Regarding the first - looks like it breaks the scenario when
platform-specific options are passed behind `--` arguments
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-windows/pull/140#issuecomment-173503621
Thanks @bso-intel, and @vladimir-kotikov for merging!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ghenry22 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-media/pull/62#issuecomment-173504921
@purplecabbage I have added rate control when streaming from a URL using
avplayer and tested that it works. However test case 19 still fails in the
GitHub user vladimir-kotikov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/250
CB-10406 Fixes an exception, thrown when building using Ant
See [CB-10406](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10406)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
I vote +1:
* Verified archives via `coho verify-archive`
* Verified tags manually
* Verified that blank app creates correctly with platform
* Verified that blank app can be successfully ran and built
* Verified that platform can be updated from previous version
* Verified compatibility with core
I'll be there.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Parashuram N wrote:
> From Microsoft, Ryan, Dmitry and Mefire should be there.
>
>
>
>
> On 1/20/16, 5:48 PM, "Don Coleman" wrote:
>
>>I'll be there.
>>
>>On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jesse
GitHub user mlegenhausen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/190
Disable ios-deploy wifi mode when deploying to a device
Currently when running `cordova run ios --device` the app gets deployed two
times via usb and wifi. But when disconnecting from USB
Github user nikhilkh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/251#issuecomment-173645357
LGTM - Not clear why travis test is failing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user nikhilkh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/460#issuecomment-173651559
This looks great! Couple of comments - while your example illustrates this
- your specification is not very precise:
1. Consider clarifying the position of
Github user riknoll commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/460#issuecomment-173656844
The content looks good to me, but I had difficulty reading the document. It
wasn't clear to me which parts of it are examples and which are the guidelines.
The
Github user falkobuttler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-inappbrowser/pull/136#issuecomment-173673675
@asfgit
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user daserge commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-splashscreen/pull/71#issuecomment-173654883
@njleonzhang, will not this change cause a memory leak?
`// hide the splash screen to avoid leaking a window`
---
If your project is set up for
GitHub user riknoll opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/461
CB-8917: Improving Android lifecycle docs
@nikhilkh @jasongin please give this a review when you get the chance. I
rewrote the lifecycle guide to clarify a few things. Mostly, I wanted to
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/460#issuecomment-173674096
Looks good, but I'm a bit confused with examples, which ones are examples ?
which aren't ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
When this release goes out, I think it's a good idea for us to point to the new
Android Lifecycle Guide I added to the docs in the blog post.
http://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/dev/guide/platforms/android/lifecycle.html
I also have a PR open that improves it here:
Github user riknoll commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/460#issuecomment-173687210
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
From Microsoft, Ryan, Dmitry and Mefire should be there.
On 1/20/16, 5:48 PM, "Don Coleman" wrote:
>I'll be there.
>
>On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jesse wrote:
>
>> Who all from this list is attending PGD next week in Utah?
>> Of course
Github user shazron commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/190#issuecomment-173697815
Note that this has to be bumped up to 1.8.3 as well:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/71
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user dblotsky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/71#issuecomment-173702949
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Should we set a rough goal/timeline on when to make this default? Cordova
6.1.0? Put the non browserify workflow behind a --no-browserify flag.
I'll plan to write a blog post and put it up for review week after PGDAY.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/460
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user dblotsky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/71#issuecomment-173743128
@nikhilkh: yep. Committed at the same time that this got merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Sent a PR for the blog post for review
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/462
Richard, can you add a section about the new lifecycle stuff. I figured you
could explain it better than I as I am unfamiliar with the changes.
Just send a PR or leave it as a comment and I can integrate it.
Github user nikhilkh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/159#issuecomment-173744561
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user stevengill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/462
added android 5.1.0 release blog post
Please leave comments or send a PR with changes.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user rakatyal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/159
CB-10227 Fix to allow spam tapping on camera video screen on Windows
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user sarangan12 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/72
CB-10405 - Connectivity issue to Cordova VM
1. Added retry logic while checking if cordova vms are up.
2. Increased server response timeout from 3 seconds to 15 seconds
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/159
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
+1
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal
wrote:
> Should we version our docs on every major version (instead of minor
> version) of cordova CLI that comes out? Should the next version of the docs
> be "6.x"? Honestly, not much changes every minor release and
Github user nikhilkh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/71#issuecomment-173708497
@dblotsky Are you planning to commit this to svn repo?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user horozco opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/158
[CB-10388] - Added correctOrientation support for android 4.4
Jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10388
- Currently If You pass the correctOrientation param
GitHub user nikhilkh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/231
Remove browserify from experimental flags list
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/MSOpenTech/cordova-cli updateHelp
Great! Looks like we just need to update the help text then. I sent a PR for
this: https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/231
Anyone wants to talk about the merits of using the browserify workflow? Our
blog might be a good place for that.
-Nikhil
-Original Message-
From:
Should we version our docs on every major version (instead of minor version) of
cordova CLI that comes out? Should the next version of the docs be "6.x"?
Honestly, not much changes every minor release and maintaining multiple copies
has quite a few downsides w.r.t. SEO (referring to older
Github user Tempus35 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-geolocation/pull/25#issuecomment-173720901
I am having this issue still on android
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
SGTM! +1
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal >
> wrote:
>
> > Should we version our docs on every major version (instead of minor
> >
Github user sarangan12 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/72#issuecomment-173762044
@dblotsky Refactored the code to use callback. Can you review the latest
code?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user sarangan12 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/72#issuecomment-173767433
@dblotsky Incorporated both the comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dblotsky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/72#discussion_r50489033
--- Diff: medic/medic-run.js ---
@@ -324,23 +349,8 @@ function main() {
util.fatal("app " + appPath + " does not exist");
}
Github user dblotsky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/72#discussion_r50488969
--- Diff: medic/medic-run.js ---
@@ -324,23 +349,8 @@ function main() {
util.fatal("app " + appPath + " does not exist");
}
Github user riknoll commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/462#issuecomment-173770573
Here's my blurb:
This update introduces a new API for Android plugin authors. Plugins that
launch external activities can now better handle method calls
Github user dblotsky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/72#discussion_r50492408
--- Diff: medic/medic-run.js ---
@@ -44,7 +44,9 @@ var MEDIC_BUILD_PREFIX= "medic-cli-build";
var DEFAULT_WINDOWS_VERSION = "store";
Github user njleonzhang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-splashscreen/pull/71#issuecomment-173780749
@daserge, I don't think this will cause memory leak. In addition, it
doesn't make sense to hide the splash, if you have disabled
Github user dblotsky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/72#issuecomment-173771334
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/462#issuecomment-173790600
Great write up! Very detailed and informative. I'll add it to the blog
soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Thanks, Steve for taking up on writing the blog post. It would be great to use
that to drive some usage and feedback loop. Also, we might want to do JIRA
triage of related issues to ensure that it does not result in any regressions.
I took a quick look and most of it is not relevant currently
Github user dblotsky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/72#discussion_r50489182
--- Diff: medic/medic-run.js ---
@@ -291,6 +293,29 @@ function failedBecauseNoDevice(output) {
return NO_DEVICE_PATTERN.test(output);
}
Github user sarangan12 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/72#issuecomment-173774638
@dblotsky Changed the name of the constant
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user nikhilkh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/461#discussion_r50504102
--- Diff: www/docs/en/dev/guide/platforms/android/lifecycle.md ---
@@ -116,10 +196,21 @@ onResume(event) {
if(event.pendingResult) {
Github user mlegenhausen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/190#issuecomment-173837624
Thanks for the hint. Commit updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user nikhilkh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/461#discussion_r50504004
--- Diff: www/docs/en/dev/guide/platforms/android/lifecycle.md ---
@@ -102,12 +178,16 @@ The possible plugin statuses in the `pendingResult`
field
Github user nikhilkh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/461#discussion_r50503985
--- Diff: www/docs/en/dev/guide/platforms/android/lifecycle.md ---
@@ -22,57 +22,127 @@ title: Android Lifecycle Guide
# Android Lifecycle
Github user nikhilkh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/461#discussion_r50503967
--- Diff: www/docs/en/dev/guide/platforms/android/lifecycle.md ---
@@ -80,14 +150,20 @@ The payload for the `resume` event adheres to the
following
Github user nikhilkh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/461#discussion_r50503717
--- Diff: www/docs/en/dev/guide/platforms/android/lifecycle.md ---
@@ -80,14 +150,20 @@ The payload for the `resume` event adheres to the
following
Github user nikhilkh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/461#issuecomment-173819724
It will be useful to add references to Android docs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user nikhilkh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/461#discussion_r50503891
--- Diff: www/docs/en/dev/guide/platforms/android/lifecycle.md ---
@@ -102,12 +178,16 @@ The possible plugin statuses in the `pendingResult`
field
YES YES YES! Please cordova_plugins.js is killing me.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:10 PM Nikhil Khandelwal
wrote:
> Where are we with --browserify support? From what I can see, most or all
> the work has been completed:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8801
>
>
Sounds great! I'll post the blog for review soon and would love for you to
add a little blurb about this in it.
For docs, I say merge it in and I can update the site. It would fall into
the `dev` branch unless you explicitly add the changes to 5.4.0 docs folder
as well.
I plan on cutting a 6.0.0
Github user rakatyal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/460#issuecomment-173686307
Addressed comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
I've been using the --browserify flag for several months and it's been
working great
On 21 January 2016 at 11:02, Anis KADRI wrote:
> YES YES YES! Please cordova_plugins.js is killing me.
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:10 PM Nikhil Khandelwal
>
Github user nikhilkh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/460#issuecomment-173687010
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
64 matches
Mail list logo