- Jeffrey Heifetz
On Nov. 12, 2013, 8:22 p.m., Bryan Higgins wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15461
I¹d like to update all the BlackBerry plugins with dependencies to point
to the registry now that our plugins are there before this release.
On 10/24/2013, 2:26 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
I am planning on doing some releases today
Plugins:
, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz
jheif...@blackberry.comwrote:
I¹d like to update all the BlackBerry plugins with dependencies to point
to the registry now that our plugins are there before this release.
On 10/24/2013, 2:26 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
I am planning
I thought that if an issue is assigned it means nothing but if it's marked as
in progress then someone is working on it. There are still components with
default assignees I thought.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
Original Message
From: Andrew Grieve
Sent:
I'm not sure if I'll make it for the hacking, but I'm going to try and
make it for the social event.
On 13-10-21 4:12 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Please tell me if this list is wrong:
Attending: Joe, Shaz, Anis, Bryan Higgins, Gorkem, Carlos
I'll start a private thread with
You can use the review board by uploading a diff so you don't technically need
the reviewboard.rc.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Carlos Santana
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:41 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14621/#review27033
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jeffrey Heifetz
On Oct. 12, 2013, 2:45 a.m
the weekend.
- Jeffrey Heifetz
On Oct. 12, 2013, 2:45 a.m., Ian Clelland wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14621
91697e9
src/metadata/wp8_parser.js 8dc121b
src/prepare.js b6928b9
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14376/diff/
Testing
---
Tested and Working for BlackBerry use cases
Thanks,
Jeffrey Heifetz
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14446/#review26616
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jeffrey Heifetz
On Oct. 2, 2013, 5:54 p.m
Is that the reason that commit that was just pushed had the wrong issue # ?
On 13-10-02 2:35 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@google.com wrote:
As I just discovered, git has a bug where it will strip the leading
[CB-] when using git am to apply a patch made with git format-patch.
Details here: [1].
Since I believe Lorin is away, I have tagged the release for blackberry.
On 13-10-01 1:01 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
If any platform owners don't have time to do this today, let me know how
I can help.
On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
I
It seems as though there is no cordova-cli 3.1.x branch, does this mean we
always release off of master?
There is a bug I found where element tree needs to be bumped to the same
version as plugman to support namespace xml elements and I'd like to know
where to push this.
Thanks,
Jeff
On
David Kemp's buoldbot found a bug in cli from the plugman bump. I have a fix
upcoming
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: Andrew Grieve
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 5:47 PM
To: dev
Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tagging 3.1.0 today?
On Tue, Oct
BlackBerry10 needs a commit into CordovaJS for 3.1 as well. (Does this
mean all platforms must be updated?)
On 13-09-30 1:38 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
iOS has a bug fix that is not in RC1 (but in the 3.1.x branch) related to
the Keyboard preferences in iOS 7 (visual bug). This is why
I can take the responsibility of tagging BlackBerry. Could you send me the wiki
with instructions ?
From: Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.orgmailto:agri...@chromium.org
Date: Thursday, 19 September, 2013 10:40 AM
To: dev dev@cordova.apache.orgmailto:dev@cordova.apache.org, Jeffrey
Heifetz jheif
board ?
On 13-09-12 2:13 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Thats awesome, looking forward to it!
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz
jheif...@blackberry.comwrote:
Yup I'm on the same page with you Michal, and I believe Braden as well.
I'm sorry I should have said so
suggest that the last word; the file whose changes are added
last,
is the app config.xml. This allows the user the power to override any
default or setting from a plugin.
Braden
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz
jheif...@blackberry.com
wrote:
I'd like to clarify the changes
will of course implement it the
way Braden proposed it though.
On 13-09-10 1:58 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote:
Issue Created - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4774
On 13-09-10 9:30 AM, Tommy-Carlos Williams to...@devgeeks.org wrote:
Then colour me excited!
+1
Issue Created - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4774
On 13-09-10 9:30 AM, Tommy-Carlos Williams to...@devgeeks.org wrote:
Then colour me excited!
+1
On 10/09/2013, at 11:27 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Tommy-Carlos Williams
. If you want a git relative path then url = . and
for file-system relative url != . and does not have ://
Does this seem correct to everyone? Does anyone have any strong opinions
one way or the other?
On 13-09-04 4:18 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote:
While I believe we could
.
Conceptually, I'm not sure why the syntax for (2)
shouldn't
do what
you
request when the url for the original plugin was a local
path? Maybe
just
a bug?
-Michal
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz
jheif...@blackberry.comwrote:
We were working
We were working on a redistribution of Cordova that included some plugins and
ran into a use-case not covered by the current plugin spec.[1]
Currently there are two ways to specify a dependency
1. Using a combination of url, commit and subdir which plugman will use to
clone down a repo and
We've been doing all our scripts in node and have yet to find a better route
than .bat scripts that call in. So I'm interested if anyone knows of one.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: Benn Mapes
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 5:53 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
I would think '*' is an invalid subdir
On 13-07-31 3:26 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Im pretty sure that can be removed entirely or set to ..
On 7/30/13 6:49 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the point of the wildcard in the dependency tag of plugin.xml ?
I have an issue
BlackBerry10 supports both Media and SplashScreen but not Globalization
On 13-07-31 9:52 AM, Michael Sierra msie...@adobe.com wrote:
I can see another couple of problems that need to be fixed. Please take
a moment to review this table for any platform you're particularly
familiar with.
Thanks,
I recently added some end to end testing into the plugman tests run via npm
test and on some machines these can take a while to run (Fil is saying 10s
timeouts are being hit).
While I know mocking these things can speed up the tests, I personally feel
like they are more valuable as integration
You haw no signing key provided so it's skipping debug token generation. You
need to either add a key store pass value to your
%home%/.cordova/blackberry10.json or use the platform level cordova/run script
with -k and your key store pass.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers
When the config.xml for mobile-spec was re-written recently the author
element was removed and I'm just wondering if this is valid. In the BlackBerry
implementation we've always required one and I'm wondering if this behaviour is
wrong, or if I should add one to mobile-spec.
Thanks,
Jeff
of it
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.comwrote:
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: Michal Mocny
Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 1:19 PM
To: dev
Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: CLI's master2
If master
+1
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: Bryan Higgins
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 9:39 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Jake woes
+1
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Lucas Holmquist lholm...@redhat.comwrote:
+1
On Jun
+1
On 13-06-20 9:06 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Definitely torn on this one. On one hand, if there are features
implemented
on some platforms that should be implemented on others than having them
fail is a constant reminder that your platform needs to implement the
missing
I've been seeing similar issues with Jake since I've upgraded my node and
it is definitely related to Jake failing with dependencies. I have yet to
find the real root cause.
On 13-06-18 8:27 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
As both Jesse and Shaz pointed out, I ran coho to update
On BlackBerry10 we use the subdomains attribute and this seems compliant
with the spec [1]
1. http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-access/#attributes
On 13-06-17 7:20 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
iOS doesn't use the subdomains attribute, relying on the wildcard in the
origin attribute only.
Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799
On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to
refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of.
On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins
I also think there's value in having some time between posting a
diff/commit/pull request to the issue and committing to master to allow
some discussion.
On 13-06-05 2:25 PM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, putting a comment on the issue itself should be sufficient. If
you're
Congratulations, all the best to you and your family.
From: Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.orgmailto:agri...@chromium.org
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.orgmailto:dev@cordova.apache.org
dev@cordova.apache.orgmailto:dev@cordova.apache.org
Date: Friday, 31 May, 2013 10:00 AM
To: dev
I'd go with tangled history over forced re-clone.
On 13-05-29 11:00 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
I'll keep this thread up to date with INFRA's responses.
I asked INFRA about options and their implications. These are the four
options I described, after I was informed that
If bin is top level, it requires a non-standard first parameter to distinguish
sub-platform. I know this is the same as the old way, but it's very unique to
the BlackBerry implementation.
Perhaps if this just routed to sub platform bin scripts it would be ideal.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10
There will be a pull request coming, its just running through testing atm
https://github.com/blackberry/cordova-plugman/pull/2. I expect to
re-target this to apache in the coming hours.
On 13-05-10 1:52 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Only issue I see is that source-file support was removed
What about plugman and cli?
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: Lorin Beer
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 7:04 PM
To: dev
Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: blackberry 10 migration
ok, we'll pull the code from Blackberry/Blackberry-Cordova and
add a `target`
attribute to it to satisfy BB's needs.
On 5/3/13 12:07 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote:
While implementing the BlackBerry10 platform updates in plugman I've
noticed that the lib-file tags have been removed. I wanted to know if
this was a conscious decision and if so
.
Perhaps an `architecture` or `arch` attribute?
Would the SOs have to be placed in a specific location (and can/would that
location need to be customized based on the library?).
On 5/3/13 12:19 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote:
If you feel framework is a better choice I'm fine
Tl;dr I'd like to propose a different but similar solution based on the
evolution of WebWorks. That we automatically inject cordova.js into a
specific place in the app (say the root since thats where cordova_plugins
is) and then the developer simply adds a script tag to the correct
location
Coming back to Braden's suggestion of specifying a url and id for plugin
dependency, I think this is the correct route, and would go further to
suggest the url is optional. I do not believe we should inherently tie
plugin dependency to the exact source. Thats why we have a discovery
system and
, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote:
Coming back to Braden's suggestion of specifying a url and id for
plugin
dependency, I think this is the correct route, and would go further to
suggest the url is optional. I do not believe we should inherently tie
plugin dependency to the exact source
, mapping to native strings representing
specific features/permissions.
`system` attribute is optional and false by default. Only used by
BlackBerry for certain system-level permissions.
I think this satisfies our use cases.
Thoughts/comments welcome.
On 4/17/13 11:07 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif
+1
On 13-04-17 4:14 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for deprecate now, remove 3.0
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for deprecate now, remove 3.0
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
My vote is to set up
, which I would encourage you to chime in on.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz
jheif...@blackberry.comwrote:
So now that the code has been out for a bit we'd like to start
talking
about getting the code into the 2.7 release.
There are no longer any hacks or hoops
Same here. Maybe it's type coercion
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Filip Maj
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 11:38 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: docs.cordova.io == 404
Works for me?
On 4/3/13 11:35 PM, Andrew Grieve
+1
On 13-03-22 1:32 PM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Propose we add ./bin/check_requirements to each platforms in 2.7
timeframe so as to remove that logic from the cordova-cli tool.
I like this solution to platform scripts, the only addition I would add is that
if the platform allows multiple targets, perhaps it could be possible to set a
default one that would be used instead of the timeout to first one (although I
suppose that makes first entry inherent default).
Sent
+11 I really like the plan
On 13-03-20 10:23 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Read through FUTURE.md. Like it! Sounds amazing! Great work guys!
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
For those unaware, cordova-plugman [1] is a tool under active
While we're discussing the platform level scripts, should we also attempt
to standardize the arguments that can be passed in as well?
On 13-03-20 6:19 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Fil: yes I like the easy wins you describe.
Anis: agree on harder wins. The `emulate` cmd should require a
Actually I'm lucky enough to be heading down to join in on the fun, looking
forward to meeting all of you.
On 2013-02-27, at 6:26 PM, Al Harding wrote:
Awesome! We've got a room booked at Adobe SF with projector, camera, beer,
so we can loop anyone in who is remote.
Look forward to meeting
.
Can you be more precise and explain exactly what you envision this new
repo to contain, and specifically why it can't come as a pull request
to the existing repo/codebase?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@rim.com wrote:
Sharzon, sorry I have no clue when BB10
With all this talk of re-organizing cordova plugins we here at BlackBerry (RIM
no more) have been discussing better alleging ourselves with the approach by
splitting our existing cordova-blackberry platform into two separate platforms.
(I saw a similar call here as well
Any responses? Also does it include the sprints as well?
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Brent Lintner
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 12:43 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Free ApacheCon (Committer) Ticket
Hey all,
I have (discounted)
58 matches
Mail list logo
