Add 'ForceReReduce=true' option to views to ensure that reduce function is
called
-
Key: COUCHDB-801
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-801
Project: Couch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879116#action_12879116
]
Chris Stockton commented on COUCHDB-664:
I think this patch is good, but I am not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Damien Katz closed COUCHDB-800.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Problem when writing larger than 4kb file headers
>
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 02:29, Rob Stewart wrote:
> Hi Randall,
>
> With a response time like that, efficiency is your strong point.
Clearly that was somewhere below my mean response time ;)
> Next, you suggest potential like solution as Cassandra and Dynamo. I'd tend
> to agree, as these are sta
Problem when writing larger than 4kb file headers
-
Key: COUCHDB-800
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-800
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Database Core
I think you are right, the call should be make_blocks(5, [Bin]). Checking in a
fix now.
-Damien
On Jun 15, 2010, at 9:10 AM, Andrey Somov wrote:
> Hi,
> while reading the CouchDB source I found a question in couch_file.erl,
> I am not sure whether it is a bug or not.
>
> Lines 297-311:
>
> h
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-780 relates to windows file
issues as well as fixing a source of surprising unresponsiveness with big
databases (finishing compaction, deleting, etc). This patch is the only one
I'd really like to wrap up for 1.0.
On Jun 15, 2010 9:16 AM, "Juhani Ränki
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879029#action_12879029
]
Randall Leeds commented on COUCHDB-393:
---
If couch is set up with vhosts then what sh
Etag of a view sould only change if a relevant document is changed
--
Key: COUCHDB-799
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-799
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Improv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Lehnardt closed COUCHDB-775.
Fix Version/s: 0.11.1
1.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Incompatible implicit decl
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Which other issues or patches that are not in 0.11.x yet do
> you think need to be addressed before we branch 1.0? I'd
> like to hear from everybody here, especially the
> non-committers.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
Windows file handling problems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879015#action_12879015
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-393:
-
discussed on irc. Also needed to make d
Hi,
while reading the CouchDB source I found a question in couch_file.erl,
I am not sure whether it is a bug or not.
Lines 297-311:
handle_call({write_header, Bin}, _From, #file{fd=Fd, eof=Pos}=File) ->
BinSize = size(Bin),
case Pos rem ?SIZE_BLOCK of
0 ->
Padding = <<>>;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benoit Chesneau closed COUCHDB-677.
---
Assignee: Benoit Chesneau
Fix Version/s: 1.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Rewrite Han
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benoit Chesneau reassigned COUCHDB-699:
---
Assignee: Benoit Chesneau
> Allow for bind variables in complex query keys for URL r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benoit Chesneau closed COUCHDB-699.
---
Resolution: Fixed
available in latest head
> Allow for bind variables in complex query keys
#2 issue of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-793
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 14 Jun 2010, at 23:18, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> >> To make sure I understand... did we agree to branch 1.0 from trunk?
> >
> > Nope, we agreed to cut 1.0 from 0.11.x. 0.11.x w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879005#action_12879005
]
Jan Lehnardt commented on COUCHDB-748:
--
Patch no longer applies cleanly to trunk. Can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879007#action_12879007
]
Jan Lehnardt commented on COUCHDB-719:
--
This patch makes the value in the view result
On 14 Jun 2010, at 23:18, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>> To make sure I understand... did we agree to branch 1.0 from trunk?
>
> Nope, we agreed to cut 1.0 from 0.11.x. 0.11.x was in disarray for a brief
> time but my latest commits are supposed to have fixed that. I think we should
> go ahead and bra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benoit Chesneau updated COUCHDB-779:
Attachment: couchdb-779-2.patch
rebased patch against trunk rev #954894
> Upgrade mochiwe
Compile mochijson2 down to native code
--
Key: COUCHDB-798
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-798
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Database Core
Re
22 matches
Mail list logo