Re: Proposal: removing view changes code from mrview

2018-04-03 Thread Paul Davis
+1 On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Joan Touzet wrote: > +1. > > 1. No one has worked on a fix since its contribution prior to 2.0. > 2. The code will always be in git in an older revision if someone is > looking for it. > 3. We have #592 which describes the fundamental

Re: Proposal: removing view changes code from mrview

2018-04-03 Thread Joan Touzet
+1. 1. No one has worked on a fix since its contribution prior to 2.0. 2. The code will always be in git in an older revision if someone is looking for it. 3. We have #592 which describes the fundamental problem that needs to be resolved. (By the way, with my PMC hat on, you should unassign

Re: Proposal: removing view changes code from mrview

2018-04-03 Thread Peng Hui Jiang
+1 Best Regards, Peng Hui From: Jan Lehnardt To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Date: 03/04/2018 08:27 PM Subject:Re: Proposal: removing view changes code from mrview +1 > On 3. Apr 2018, at 14:15, Eiri wrote: > > Hi all, > > It is my understanding

Re: Proposal: removing view changes code from mrview

2018-04-03 Thread Jan Lehnardt
+1 > On 3. Apr 2018, at 14:15, Eiri wrote: > > Hi all, > > It is my understanding that a current implementation of view changes in > mrview is conceptually broken. I heard from Robert Newson that he and > Benjamin Bastian found that some time ago doing testing with deletion and

Proposal: removing view changes code from mrview

2018-04-03 Thread Eiri
Hi all, It is my understanding that a current implementation of view changes in mrview is conceptually broken. I heard from Robert Newson that he and Benjamin Bastian found that some time ago doing testing with deletion and recreation of docs emitting same keys in the views. I propose to