Re: [DISCUSS] RAT tickets

On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 9:45 AM Claude Warren wrote: > > I think that we should do the following: ... > create a licenses section in the configuration. > > --licenses : a list of files to be read as license files. > --licenses-approved : a list of license IDs to approve. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Creadur RAT 0.16.1

+1 (Binding) Thanks for all the work on this important bug fix release. Jochen On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:50 PM P. Ottlinger wrote: > > Dear friends of RAT, > > the new v0.16.1 fixes 11 issues and I've staged a new release 0.16.1 - > thanks for all feedback and contributions! > > =View on

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-325) Performance degradation compared to 0.15

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17806386#comment-17806386 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325: - See [https://lists.apache.org/thread

RAT-325: Discussion of performance issues

Hi, I'd like to discuss RAT-325 here, as I think, that this is the proper place for such discussions. Let me start by giving an outline of the information, that I currently have: In RAT-325, the original reporter claimed to see extremely different results in terms of performance between 0.15,

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-325) Performance degradation compared to 0.15

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17806270#comment-17806270 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325: - Perfect, [~solomax] , thank you! > Performance degradat

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-325) Performance degradation compared to 0.15

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17806002#comment-17806002 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325: - [~solomax] Can you give a procedure for reproducing this, please

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-325) Performance degradation compared to 0.15

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17805031#comment-17805031 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325: - Could we, please, have a clear distinction between the following

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-325) Performance degradation compared to 0.15

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17804888#comment-17804888 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325: - [~jbonofre] In your comment from 30/Oct/2023, you unfortunately

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Creadur RAT 0.16

Here's my +1 (Binding) On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 12:05 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 from me. > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > On 28.12.23 02:13, P. Ottlinger wrote: > > Fellow developers, > > > > happy holidays - I've taken the opportunity to create a new release of > >

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-337) Apache RAT - GitHub Action

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17794224#comment-17794224 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-337: - I have no real experience with GitHub actions, so bear with me

Re: [Discuss] Future of Whisker & Tentacles subprojects

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:11 PM P. Ottlinger wrote: > Therefore I'd like to start a discussion about how to cope with > Tentacles & Whisker and see the following possibilities of action: > > a) there is active interest in both projects - projects could be > reanimated ;) > > b) both

Re: Rat, Wisker, and tentacles

To be honest: Tentacles, and Wisker are (in my opinion) basically dormant. To me, the question is when (as opposed to: if) we need to archive both? Jochen On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:32 PM Claude Warren wrote: > > I note that all 3 of these project fall under the "creadur" moniker. Are > they

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-315) RAT build fails with most current Maven 4-alpha3 build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17746577#comment-17746577 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-315: - Quoting [~pottlinger] : [~joc...@apache.org] the merge changed

[jira] [Created] (RAT-316) Add MANIFEST.MF to the default exclude list.

Jochen Wiedmann created RAT-316: --- Summary: Add MANIFEST.MF to the default exclude list. Key: RAT-316 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-316 Project: Apache Rat Issue Type: Task

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Creadur Tentacles 0.1

+1 from me (Binding) On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 10:05 PM David Blevins wrote: > > Hey All, > > Perhaps after 11 years it's time to do a release of Tentacles. Wouldn't be > offended if this vote didn't pass -- I didn't really give a heads up. Happy > to re-roll with changes if needed. > >

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-302) Site build does not work with JDK18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17550882#comment-17550882 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-302: - Hi, Philip,   as this appears to be a JDK issue, and JDK 18

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Creadur RAT 0.14

Sure, but on the other hand, we can also assume the RM's approval implicitly. On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 10:26 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Well Phil, you're also allowed to vote :-) > > On 2022/06/02 21:31:23 "P. Ottlinger" wrote: > > Hi, friendly reminder: we do need at least 3 positive binding

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Creadur RAT 0.14

Hi, sorry for the late reply, due to a week off work. Here's my +1 (Binding) Thanks very much for all your work, Philip.It's rarely mentioned, but definitely appreciated! Jochen On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:50 AM P. Ottlinger wrote: > > Hi *, > > after a long time of development we solved 37

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-283) Unify Java 8 requirement or non-requirement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17518215#comment-17518215 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-283: - I think, this has been resolved with RAT-274.   > Unify Jav

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-288) Remove -debug hint in log messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17518210#comment-17518210 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-288: - Hi, Philip,   I'm fine with accepting the patch

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17517289#comment-17517289 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-273: - Well, all I can say is: Reading your comment, I understand

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17516319#comment-17516319 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-273: - [~pottlinger] From the history, it is not obvious to me, why you

[jira] [Resolved] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-273. - Fix Version/s: 0.14 Resolution: Fixed Build for Java 16, and Java 17 is still failing

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17515591#comment-17515591 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-273: - Reviewing the usage of java.io.LineNumberReader, I found

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17515534#comment-17515534 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-273: -   See [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71697989

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17515527#comment-17515527 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-273: - So far, I can't provide a fix, but I believe to have found

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-275) Update httpclient to fix CVE-2020-13956 once a new doxia-core release is available

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17464515#comment-17464515 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-275: - Excuse me? What's going on here? AFAIK, Rat doesn't use Doxia

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-288) Remove -debug hint in log messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17397235#comment-17397235 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-288: - If I get that correctly, then we should use the Maven version

[jira] [Resolved] (RAT-236) cannot find "org/apache/rat/unapproved-licenses.xsl";

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-236. - Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Reporter didn't respond in close to four years: Closing.   > can

[jira] [Closed] (RAT-236) cannot find "org/apache/rat/unapproved-licenses.xsl";

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann closed RAT-236. --- > cannot find "org/apache/rat/unapproved-lice

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-283) Unify Java 8 requirement or non-requirement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17381594#comment-17381594 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-283: -   Excuse me? This is "Critical"?   Well, I see

Re: [RFC] RAT-270: change default value of consoleOutput to true within Maven plugin

I agree with the reporter in RAT-270, that error messages, and all kind of trouble (aka invalid files should *always* be logged to the console. any work in that direction would be welcome. (After all, that's whatt log.warn(), and log.error() are for.) Jochen On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:19 PM P.

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-199) Support for m2e in Eclipse

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17012631#comment-17012631 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-199: - Thanks, [~slachiewicz], but it would be good to have some sort

Re: INFRA-18370: Remove deprecated RAT mirror on Github

Thanks for observation, and action, Philipp, Jochen On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:19 PM P. Ottlinger wrote: > > Hi, > > I just filed an INFRA ticket to fix the deprecated github repo for RAT: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18370 > > Hopefully this avoids confusion about RAT's state

Re: [Vote] Move RAT over to Gitbox

On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 9:34 PM P. Ottlinger wrote: > as RAT is still on Subversion many people stumble upon this ancient > Github repo: https://github.com/apache/rat > > In order to benefit from the Github/Gitbox integration and the current > press releases/discussions I'd propose to trigger the

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-251) Support for SPDX identifiers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16801915#comment-16801915 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-251: - Okay. As of this writing, we are not identifying a particular

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-251) Support for SPDX identifiers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16801690#comment-16801690 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-251: - What do you have in mind? I really don't understand your desire

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-251) Support for SPDX identifiers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16801639#comment-16801639 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-251: - Please define "understand".   > Support for SPD

Error message while publishing the site

Hi, after the move to Gitbox, I am attempting to republish the Site. Means, I did run mvn site:deploy mvn scm-publish:publish-scm However, I am getting this: [INFO] Executing: cmd.exe /X /C "svn --username jochen --password * --no-auth-cache --non-interactive checkout

Re: Move Rat to Git (now)

Sorry, I clearly misunderstood. How about pushing the release now? Jochen On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 12:44 PM P. Ottlinger wrote: > > Am 02.12.18 um 11:50 schrieb Jochen Wiedmann: > > Okay, three days gone, and no objections. I'll file a Jira issue, > > mmmh - my mail didn't se

Re: Move Rat to Git (now)

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17348 On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 11:50 AM Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > Okay, three days gone, and no objections. I'll file a Jira issue, > > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 3:04 PM Jacques Le Roux > wrote: > > > > +1 easier to co

Re: Move Rat to Git (now)

> >> On Thursday, 29 November 2018, 21:59:09 CET, P. Ottlinger < > >> pottlin...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Am 29.11.18 um 08:15 schrieb Jochen Wiedmann: > >>> any objections against requesting the move of &g

Move Rat to Git (now)

Hi, any objections against requesting the move of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat to Gitbox? Experience shows, we can expect a significant rise of contributions, if they can arrive as pull requests via Github. Thanks, Jochen

Re: [VOTE] to release Apache Creadur RAT 0.13

+1 (Binding) Thanks very much for your efforts! On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 21:49 P. Ottlinger wrote: > Dear developers, > > as we only got positive feedback for the staged release I propose to > start an official voting thread for the version that is currently in: > >

Re: Looking to contribute an SBT version of rat back upstream

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 8:26 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > Being an sbt plugin, I don't think this can be easily built with Maven, so > this probably can't exist as a normal module in the regular rat project, > though if there are ideas on how to integrate it directly, I'd like to do > that.

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-249) Show list of files with unapproved licenses in console

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16517936#comment-16517936 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-249: - If I understand correctly, you are using the Maven Plugin

Re: Rat flag for failure or success

See numUnapprovedLicenses on http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/check-mojo.html, On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > I recently had this discussion in the infra HipChat room > > [10:03 AM] Jacques Le Roux: Dear Infra team

Re: [jira] [Commented] (RAT-242) Encoding of XML report

+1 to UTF-8 as the default encoding. (Even, if we had another default in the past.) And +10 to rewriting the XML stuff to use a proper XML generation tool, for example java.xml.transform. (This has always been one of the worst aspects in the Rat code base.) Jochen On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:57

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Creadur-Rat-Latest-Jdk #249

My impression is, that the problem is caused by the file .travis.yml, which doesn't contain a license. I'll try to add a license, and rerun the build. Jochen On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:28 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Creadur-Rat-Site #269

Looks, like Jenkins is internally using classes, which are compiled for Java 8. I'll try to fix that by using Java 8 for the build. On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-239) rat plugin fails in mult-iproject build when subproject has surefire-plugin forkCount=0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16192626#comment-16192626 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-239: - First of all, thanks for the excellent instructions on how

Re: [VOTE] RAT: Update language level to 1.6

+1 for dissing Java 5 now. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:55 AM, P. Ottlinger wrote: > Hi, > > following the discussion concerning JDK9-build compatibility (2017-04-29 > 11:43pm) I'd like to call for a vote to upgrade to language level 1.6 > for RAT. > > [ ] +1 proceed with

Re: [DISCUSSION] RAT does not build with JDK9 - upgrade to at least Java 1.6 language level needed

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:43 PM, P. Ottlinger wrote: > which raises the old discussion of updating to at least JDK 1.6? > > What do you think - can I file an issue for 0.13 to run with at least JDK6? To me, supporting Java 9 is much more important than Java 5. So,

Re: RfC: Rat 2

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> > wrote: > >> I would like to see code first (put it on a github repo first of your own) >> so

Re: RfC: Rat 2

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > I would like to see code first (put it on a github repo first of your own) > so we can take a look... Github is an excellent idea. See https://github.com/jochenw/rat/tree/rat2 Jochen -- The next time you

RfC: Rat 2

Hi, I am close to finishing what will be my proposal for what I preliminarily call "Rat 2". But, before I publish that to Git, I thought it might be a good idea to discuss my intentions, and gather wishes, alternative suggestions, or other sorts of input: Rat 2 is a complete rewrite of the

Re: Apache RAT 0.13 Release

Are you volunteering as the release manager? If so, go on. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi to all, > > based on the number of fixed issues in RAT 0.13 i would like to start making > a new release of Apache RAT to get forward. > > I know that

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-220) JDK version 1.6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15481510#comment-15481510 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-220: - Well, what is the paint point? Who's bothered, right now? >

[jira] [Assigned] (RAT-220) JDK version 1.6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann reassigned RAT-220: --- Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann > JDK version 1.6 > --- > >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Creadur-Rat-Site #218

Can anyone explain to me, what's wrong here? Okay, I did some changes (like updating dependencies). But nothing, that remotely reminds me of a reason for that. Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.PluginExecutionException: Execution enforce-bytecode-version of goal

[jira] [Resolved] (RAT-58) Create API module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-58. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann Fix Version/s: 0.12 > Create API mod

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-216) Update versions in pom after release of 0.12 and update dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15430253#comment-15430253 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-216: - Please clarify that statement: We are unable to update

FYI: INFRA-12231

For your info: I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12231 because the possibility of an automatically deployed website should be attractive for all of us. Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

Re: [VOTE] Terminate using the CMS

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > What would be the benefits of not using the CMS? The current site > publication process is working. Is it? If so, would you please be so kind and transfer https://home.apache.org/~jochen/site-rat-0.12RC3/ to

[VOTE] Terminate using the CMS

Hi, I'd like to call for a vote on the subject. IMO (and others seem to agree), we have no real advantage by using the CMS, which is suitable for manually developed web sites, like www.apache,org, bu certainly not for sites like ours, with big subtrees full of automatically generated content.

Re: Do we want to use the CMS?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:57 PM, P. Ottlinger wrote: > +1 > > I'd even make it more simple - move to git and use gh-pages-branch to > generate the pages. > > I'm not sure how easy that setup is with the ASF infra guys, but I'd > prefer as simple as possible. I am quite

Re: svn commit: r1748034 - in /creadur/site/trunk/content/rat: ./ apache-rat-api/ apache-rat-api/apidocs/ apache-rat-api/apidocs/org/ apache-rat-api/apidocs/org/apache/ apache-rat-api/apidocs/org/apac

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:29 AM, P. Ottlinger wrote: > could you enlighten us which steps were needed to publish the page? No. See my previous mail on that topic. (And, note: The site is currently still at 0.11, without my knowing how to change that.) Jochen -- The

Do we want to use the CMS?

I am quoting from a private mail with an Infra member: > > God, why can't we just have a single directory where we upload to? Or > > a simple SVN directory? > You can have that, but your project chose to use the CMS - if you want that > to change, I suggest > you discuss it in the project

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Rat 0.12

to tools that help to take some of the pain away from maintaining licensing information for open source projects, especially those here at Apache. You are welcome to check out the source [4] and join us on our mailing list [5]. On behalf of the Apache Creadur team, Jochen Wiedmann RAT-61: List

Site publication

Honestly: How do we do that nowadays? Thanks, Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg

[VOTE][PASS] Release Apache Rat 0.12 RC3

Hi, I am glad to note that the vote has passed with four binding votes (Sebb, David, Philipp. and mine) and one non-binding (Karl Heinz). I will proceed with pushing the distribution, and that stuff. Thanks, Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

[VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.12 RC3

Release Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/tags/apache-rat-project-0.12-RC3/ Revision1747154 Release Files: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/creadur/apache-rat-0.12RC3 Revision 13920 Proposed Maven Repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.12 RC2

On the contrary, you didd. But I was too stupid to notice. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi, > > sorry missed to explictly pointing that out ;-(... > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > On 6/1/16 8:57 AM, Joc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.12 RC2

Rats! I just notice, that the vote of Karl Heinz is non-binding. So we still need another one. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > although Davids vote is a few hours late, I think that noone will have > a p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.12 RC2

Hi, although Davids vote is a few hours late, I think that noone will have a problem, if I count that as the missing third vote, and declare the release as passed. I will proceed with publication, and announcement. Thanks, Jochen On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:27 AM, David Crossley

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.12 RC2

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > So unfortunately i have to give -1 (non binding).. As far as I can tell, all your concerms are about the site. In other words: There is no release required tto fix them. So, I'd beg you to reconsider. Thanks,

[VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.12 RC2

The following things have changed, compared to RC1: - NOTICE file has been updated. - KEYS file moved to the release tree. - RELEASE_NOTES.txt has been removed, there's now only one. - Links to apache-rat-gradle have been eliminated. Source Tag:

-bin and -src files on Maven Central

Hi, I'd like to havae a short discussion regarding the -src, and -bin files on Maven Central. First of all, please keep in mind, that we did this before, and noone bothered: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.11/ Second, the reason why we

[VOTE][Cancel] Release Apache Rat 0.12 RC1

Okay, according to the -1 votes from sebb and Karl Heinz, I am cencelling RC1. Expect an RC2, and another vote soon. Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.12 RC1

Forgot the SVN Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/tags/apache-rat-project-0.12-RC1/ On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Proposed distribution: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/creadur/apache-rat-0.12RC

[VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.12 RC1

Proposed distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/creadur/apache-rat-0.12RC1/ Proposed KEYS: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/creadur/apache-rat-0.12RC1/KEYS Proposed site: http://home.apache.org/~jochen/site-rat-0.12RC1/ Proposed Maven repository:

Re: Release Apache Rat 0.12

Not really. See my mails on dev@. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > sorry pushing > any progress on this? > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:43 AM, P. Ottlinger <pottlin...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Am 28.04.2016

SimplePatternBasedLicense vs. FullTextMatchingLicense

Hi, can anyone explain to me (in simple words, preferrably :-) the difference between the license base classes. Thanks, Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg

Re: Proper use of mvn release:prepare

Hi, Karl Heinz, yes I did run release:prepare in the parent project (except, that I did it in the release branch, and not in the trunk). Thanks, Jochen On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 5/10/16 1:35 PM, Jochen

Proper use of mvn release:prepare

Hi, I was running "mvn release:prepare" in the release branch for Rat 0.12. However, the created tag contains SNAPSHOT versions [1]. Are you aware of anything that I might have done wrong? Thanks, Jochen 1:

Fwd: [jira] [Created] (RAT-213) Upgrade Apache Commons Collections to v3.2.2

Philipp, it would have been nice to drop a few words on why we should upgrade. Just the higher version number is a bit weak. -- Forwarded message -- From: Philipp Ottlinger (JIRA) Date: Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:53 AM Subject: [jira] [Created] (RAT-213) Upgrade

Error when generating release notes ffor Rat

Hi, Sebb, could you please be so kind and have a look into the release-notes.vm of RAT? I am getting the error below and don't feel confident to resolve that without help. Thanks, Jochen $ mvn clean install -Prelease-notes -Dchanges.version=0.12 [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO]

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-163) Gradle Rat plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14935143#comment-14935143 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-163: - Regarding "Building with JDK 5", please note the

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-208) Add support for exclude files to maven plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14935342#comment-14935342 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-208: - @[~tillw]: I've called for a release on dev@creadur. >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Creadur-Rat #290 / RAT-208

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:56 PM, P. Ottlinger wrote: >> Added includesFile, excludesFile, includesFileCharacterset, and >> excludesFileCharacterset parameters, >> and support thereof. > > > Do we really need this parameter? I'd assume the exclude/include-File to > have

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-163) Gradle Rat plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14909763#comment-14909763 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-163: - [~eskatos] Would you be able to provide a patch, that removes

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Creadur-Rat #274 / RAT builds fail / time to update our JDK target version?

I'd be very much in favour of separating the Gradle plugin. At least, I can think of no reason, why we shouldn't have and release that as a seperate project, with Rat as a dependency. For now, it only seems to be a burden. On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 9:17 PM, P. Ottlinger

Re: [jira] [Commented] (RAT-163) Gradle Rat plugin

Okay, how do I process that request? On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Paul Merlin (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14605568#comment-14605568 ] Paul

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-60) Create Crawler Module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14548091#comment-14548091 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-60: Robert: What do you mean by Crawler Module? Create

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-160) Fails to ignore build.log created by maven-invoker-plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14487159#comment-14487159 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-160: - @[~khmarbaise]: That's certainly not the issue

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-199) Support for m2e in Eclipse

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14384466#comment-14384466 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-199: - What do you expect? An M2E connector that advises

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-199) Support for m2e in Eclipse

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14384490#comment-14384490 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-199: - As I guessed, you'd like to see a connector

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-198) Upgrade plexus-utils to 3.0.20

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381764#comment-14381764 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-198: - Then: What are the advantages (if any

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-198) Upgrade plexus-utils to 3.0.20

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381466#comment-14381466 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-198: - Is this related to RAT-197 (see my comment

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-197) Exclude the new .mvn/ folder from rat checked

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14379988#comment-14379988 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-197: - The best way to do this will most likely

  1   2   >