Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.4.1 - take 2

2011-06-10 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release. This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel. List of issues:

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.3.5 - take 2

2011-06-10 Thread Sean O'Callaghan
+1 -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: 10 June 2011 03:38 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.3.5 - take 2 We've resolved over 58 issues since 2.3.4 and thus is time for a release. This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.4.1 - take 2

2011-06-10 Thread Sean O'Callaghan
+1 -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: 10 June 2011 03:38 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.4.1 - take 2 We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release. This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.4.1 - take 2

2011-06-10 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 Christian Am 10.06.2011 04:38, schrieb Daniel Kulp: We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release. This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel. List of issues:

[DISCUSS] Remove JBI stuff in 2.5

2011-06-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
I want to start a discussion about removing the JBI related modules on trunk. There is the JBI binding, JBI transport, and the JBI integration module that, IMO, could be removed. Basically, if you are using CXF in JBI, you are most likely using the CXF BC/SE components from ServiceMix,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.4.1 - take 2

2011-06-10 Thread Willem Jiang
+1 Willem On 6/10/11 10:38 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release. This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel. List of issues:

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove JBI stuff in 2.5

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Genender
Finally! ;-) Yes.. I think its a good idea. Jeff On Jun 10, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: I want to start a discussion about removing the JBI related modules on trunk. There is the JBI binding, JBI transport, and the JBI integration module that, IMO, could be removed.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.4.1 - take 2

2011-06-10 Thread Glen Mazza
+1 Glen Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release. -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-CXF-2-4-1-take-2-tp4474979p4476203.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove JBI stuff in 2.5

2011-06-10 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 That sounds good Christian Am 10.06.2011 14:57, schrieb Daniel Kulp: I want to start a discussion about removing the JBI related modules on trunk. There is the JBI binding, JBI transport, and the JBI integration module that, IMO, could be removed. Basically, if you are using CXF in JBI,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.3.5 - take 2

2011-06-10 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
+1 - Dennis On 06/10/2011 02:37 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 58 issues since 2.3.4 and thus is time for a release. This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel. List of issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.4.1 - take 2

2011-06-10 Thread Jim Ma
+1 On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Dennis Sosnoski d...@sosnoski.com wrote: +1  - Dennis On 06/10/2011 02:38 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release. This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.