2011/9/15 Freeman Fang freeman.f...@gmail.com:
Not sure we can download and ship the wsdl with CXF kit per license reason.
I was thinking about what to do with WS-RM tests and wanted to ask
about the licencing condition for those interoperabiliy lab's WSDLs.
Another thing I wanted to ask was
All,
I would like to initiate a discussion on contributing a STS (Security
Token Service) framework implementation to CXF. CXF currently has an
STS framework in the ws-security module, and ships with a simple
implementation in the examples. Talend would like to contribute a more
sophisticated
Colm and I were discussing this a bit yesterday as well. I'm not really sure
what to do. :-(
One thought I had was that if we could somehow get the wsdl's (any Mac
TimeMachine users that may have them from a previous build or something?) I
could throw them up on my personal server for now.
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 2:25:55 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
2011/9/15 Freeman Fang freeman.f...@gmail.com:
Not sure we can download and ship the wsdl with CXF kit per license
reason.
I was thinking about what to do with WS-RM tests and wanted to ask
about the licencing condition for those
Hi
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 3:27:06 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
In my opinion, this implementation will greatly enhance CXF's security
story and will help to drive new users to the product. I would like to
ask the CXF community for their opinion on this contribution (+1/-1?).
On 2011-9-16, at 上午1:07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 3:27:06 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
In my opinion, this implementation will greatly enhance CXF's
security
story and will help to drive new users to the product. I would like
to
ask the CXF community for
On 2011-9-16, at 上午12:56, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Colm and I were discussing this a bit yesterday as well. I'm not
really sure
what to do. :-(
One thought I had was that if we could somehow get the wsdl's (any Mac
TimeMachine users that may have them from a previous build or
something?) I
I'd love to have this in trunk.
+1 on in trunk,
+1 on this being available - it is one of the core questions asked in
enterprise setups.
+1 also for making this very very very modular.
/je
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:22 PM, Freeman Fang wrote:
On 2011-9-16, at 上午1:07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Dan, as an ASF member, are you allowed to send an email asking if we can copy
this down into
svn?
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Freeman Fang wrote:
On 2011-9-16, at 上午12:56, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Colm and I were discussing this a bit yesterday as well. I'm not really sure
what to do.
On Fri Sep 16 09:35:33 2011, Freeman Fang wrote:
On 2011-9-16, at 上午12:56, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Colm and I were discussing this a bit yesterday as well. I'm not
really sure
what to do. :-(
One thought I had was that if we could somehow get the wsdl's (any Mac
TimeMachine users that may have
+1 for we introduce a services module to house these kind of Service
which is based on CXF and can be use out of box :)
It could be helpful for the user to use this kind of Enterprise service
more easily.
On 9/16/11 1:07 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 3:27:06 PM
11 matches
Mail list logo
