I just got confirmation that the current trunk of the CXF-DOSGi passes
the TCK again. It would be *really* good if we could release this
version so that the Remote Services and RSA RI in the OSGi systems is
a released version of CXF-DOSGi rather than a snapshot. Sergey, could
I maybe ask you to do
Hi David
On 20/03/12 08:00, David Bosschaert wrote:
I just got confirmation that the current trunk of the CXF-DOSGi passes
the TCK again.
Great news, thanks for the support from your side,
It would be *really* good if we could release this
version so that the Remote Services and RSA RI in
Hi Freeman
On 20/03/12 10:12, ff...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ffang
Date: Tue Mar 20 09:08:19 2012
New Revision: 1302802
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1302802view=rev
Log:
rt-transports-http module should optionally depend on spring
Modified:
Hi Sergey,
On 20 March 2012 09:47, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David
On 20/03/12 08:00, David Bosschaert wrote:
I just got confirmation that the current trunk of the CXF-DOSGi passes
the TCK again.
Great news, thanks for the support from your side,
It would be
On 2012-3-20, at 下午6:19, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Freeman
On 20/03/12 10:12, ff...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ffang
Date: Tue Mar 20 09:08:19 2012
New Revision: 1302802
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1302802view=rev
Log:
rt-transports-http module should optionally depend on spring
Hi,
It looks some thing wrong on the server side which your client want to
access.
Caused by: java.io.IOException: The https URL hostname does not match
the
Common Name (CN) on the server certificate. To disable this check (NOT
recommended for production) set the CXF client TLS
I'm concerned about this commit. This could potentially remove jars from
peoples classpaths which can easily cause breakages. As an example, with
this change the wsdl_first example doesn't even compile anymore. I'm
definitely OK with the idea on trunk (think it's already done there), but
Hi David
On 20/03/12 11:00, David Bosschaert wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 20 March 2012 09:47, Sergey Beryozkinsberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David
On 20/03/12 08:00, David Bosschaert wrote:
I just got confirmation that the current trunk of the CXF-DOSGi passes
the TCK again.
Great news, thanks
Ok, rallback this change on our fixes branches.
Thanks
Freeman
On 2012-3-20, at 下午9:34, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I'm concerned about this commit. This could potentially remove
jars from
peoples classpaths which can easily cause breakages. As an
example, with
this change the wsdl_first
Thank you sirs!
On Mar 20, 2012, at 6:54 PM, Freeman Fang wrote:
Ok, rallback this change on our fixes branches.
Thanks
Freeman
On 2012-3-20, at 下午9:34, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I'm concerned about this commit. This could potentially remove jars from
peoples classpaths which can easily
10 matches
Mail list logo
