Hi Sergey, On 20 March 2012 09:47, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David > > On 20/03/12 08:00, David Bosschaert wrote: >> >> I just got confirmation that the current trunk of the CXF-DOSGi passes >> the TCK again. > > Great news, thanks for the support from your side, > >> It would be *really* good if we could release this >> version so that the Remote Services and RSA RI in the OSGi systems is >> a released version of CXF-DOSGi rather than a snapshot. Sergey, could >> I maybe ask you to do a release again? > > I'm planning to do a 1.3.1 release in the June/July time frame, few JIRAs > have been opened against 1.3 so I'll try to address some of them too before > cutting a new release.
The TCK compliance work I did was part of the OSGi 4.3 Compendium cycle and I expect that the RIs for that (of which CXF-DOSGi is part) will be collected soon - within 2 weeks is my guess, but I can get a more detailed deadline if needed. If we want a released version of CXF-DOSGi to be part of that RI, we need to have that release before then. Otherwise they'll take the current version which is based on a 1.4 snapshot... Would there be an issue with just releasing what's there now (read: really soon) and maybe do a 1.3.2 in June/July? I've never done an Apache release so I'm not really sure how much work is involved, but if it's just a matter of a few commands, I think it would be worth it doing it now - but obviously that all depends on time people have available too... >> Here's a summary of the fixes: >> * Fixed exports from Single Bundle Distro >> * Fixed deadlock >> * Fixed cleanup >> * Fixed ExportReferenceImpl.equals() and hashCode() >> * Fixed RemoteServiceAdminCore.exportService() >> >> As these issues are all exposed by the OSGi TCK I didn't write any >> additional tests for them in the CXF-DOSGi codebase. >> As an aside. Note that it is possible for Apache committers to run the >> OSGi TCK. If anyone is interested let me know and I'll dig up the >> details. > > Is that info in the public domain ? If yes then may be you can add this info > to the DOSGi wiki ? It is documented for Felix and Equinox projects that implement other OSGi specs, but I'll take an action item to document this on the DOSGi wiki as well. Cheers, David
