Daniel Kulp dkulp@... writes:
On Oct 4, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Alessio Soldano asoldano@... wrote:
Hi,
to prevent the need for doing changes in ws deployments similar to what
has been done in [1] as a consequence of the changes in [2], I would add
the following entry in the
Hi all,
You probably notice my minor contribution for one year or more.
I have to leave Apache CXF because lack of spare time.
It has been an amazing working with you, during GSOC and after.
I would especially like to thank Sergey for helping me with project.
Goodbye.
With best wishes,
Hi Tomasz
On 31/10/12 11:21, Tomasz Oponowicz wrote:
Hi all,
You probably notice my minor contribution for one year or more.
I have to leave Apache CXF because lack of spare time.
You don't have to say 'goodbye' if you have no spare time :-),
many committers who have no spare time do not
On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
Hi all,
currently we use a mix of log4j and util logging in CXF-DOSGi.
That definitely should be fixed. Not sure why we would have had a mix like
that.
I just saw that zookeeper changed their logging to
No objection from me either.
Best regards,
David
On 31 October 2012 14:45, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
Hi all,
currently we use a mix of log4j and util logging in CXF-DOSGi.
That definitely should
On 31/10/12 14:45, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Christian Schneiderch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
Hi all,
currently we use a mix of log4j and util logging in CXF-DOSGi.
That definitely should be fixed. Not sure why we would have had a mix like
that.
I just saw
