Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Thorsten Höger
Am 22.01.2014 18:25, schrieb Sergey Beryozkin: > On 22/01/14 17:18, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >> On Jan 22, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Christian Schneider >> wrote: >> >>> There is one thing that might be different. >>> >>> I recently "committed/pushed" a change from a non committer to karaf. I >>> proposed

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Jeff Genender
On Jan 22, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > > Does using 'git diff' and attaching the patches to JIRA works at all ? > Yep… it works perfectly. Jeff > Sergey >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> Am 22.01.2014 15:40, schrieb Daniel Kulp: Anyone who i

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
On 22/01/14 17:18, Daniel Kulp wrote: On Jan 22, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: There is one thing that might be different. I recently "committed/pushed" a change from a non committer to karaf. I proposed to the developer to fork the karaf repo on github and commit and push

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Jan 22, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: > There is one thing that might be different. > > I recently "committed/pushed" a change from a non committer to karaf. I > proposed to the developer to fork the karaf repo on github and commit and > push there. I then thought to use a

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Christian Schneider
There is one thing that might be different. I recently "committed/pushed" a change from a non committer to karaf. I proposed to the developer to fork the karaf repo on github and commit and push there. I then thought to use a github pull request but this probably would not have worked as the k

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Jan 22, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote: > On 22/01/14 15:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> Few thoughts though: >> >> 1) Lets wait until after at least milestone2. We’re close and I don’t want >> to screw any of that up. >> >> 2) I’d LIKE to rebuild the git repo and possibly remove all

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Alessio Soldano
On 22/01/14 15:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: On Jan 22, 2014, at 4:20 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and Karaf). As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports) I think it makes sense to also do this switch fo

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Jan 22, 2014, at 4:20 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and Karaf). > As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports) I > think it makes sense to also do this switch for cxf. > > Any opinions? I’m OK

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Aki Yoshida
+1 I am using git-svn and it is a little bit of pain to sync the svn props when down porting changes. (and this is resulting in superfluous commits in the commits list of 2.7.x and even more in 2.6.x). So I also would prefer to switching to plain git. regards, aki 2014/1/22 Christian Schneider

RE: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Oliver Wulff
+1 From: Willem Jiang [willem.ji...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 January 2014 13:20 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git It’s not pleasure work to merge the patches between the branches in SVN behind the GFW. I’m +1 for swathing cxf to

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Willem Jiang
It’s not pleasure work to merge the patches between the branches in SVN behind the GFW. I’m +1 for swathing cxf to git. -- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.ja

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Thorsten Höger
I would love to have CXF use git. I currently use the git copy and it would be great if this repo would be the "truth". Regards, Thorsten Am 22.01.2014 12:10, schrieb Dennis Sosnoski: > +1 > > I'm using git-svn now, would love to have git direct. > > - Dennis > > On 01/22/2014 10:20 PM, Christ

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
+1 I'm using git-svn now, would love to have git direct. - Dennis On 01/22/2014 10:20 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and Karaf). As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports) I think it makes sense t

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread David Bosschaert
Yes, good idea! David On 22 January 2014 09:20, Christian Schneider wrote: > Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and > Karaf). > As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports) I > think it makes sense to also do this switch for cxf. > > Any

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
On 22/01/14 09:20, Christian Schneider wrote: Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and Karaf). As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports) I think it makes sense to also do this switch for cxf. Any opinions? Comment from someone who has be

Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Freeman Fang
+1 － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat On 2014-1-22, at 下午5:20, Christian Schneider wrote: > Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and Karaf). > As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports) I >

Discuss: Switching cxf to git

2014-01-22 Thread Christian Schneider
Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and Karaf). As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports) I think it makes sense to also do this switch for cxf. Any opinions? Christian -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Open Source