anest" way of doing what I want to achieve even if it's a bit
more complex.
Would you have an idea ?
Best,
Jerome
Le 14/08/2015 13:49, Sergey Beryozkin a écrit :
Hi
I did try disabling the default servlet in one of the demos. But I
used CXFBlueprintServlet instead and registered the bu
uot;No service was
found." instead of displaying the service output.
Best,
Jerome
Le 14/08/2015 13:16, Sergey Beryozkin a écrit :
Hi
The default HTTP transport creates a /cxf context, without it it is up
to the custom application how to control the context name, does
/test-uri respond, et
Hi
The default HTTP transport creates a /cxf context, without it it is up
to the custom application how to control the context name, does
/test-uri respond, etc ?
Sergey
On 14/08/15 10:31, jrevillard wrote:
Last but not least, my enpoints are registered:Best,Jerome
--
View this message in
Hi Romain
Yes, as Dan mentioned, a major refactoring has been done in CXF 3.1.x.
I'd say having xmlschema and woodstox dependencies is not a major
problem. JAX-RS servers do not need the JAX-RS client implementation,
though not yet the other way around, but now that we have client and
server m
&version=12332051
Git tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf-fediz.git;a=commit;h=97ea63580759503576da76b1fb91aa20113664ae
+1 from me.
Colm.
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
=12313420&version=12328874
Git tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf-fediz.git;a=commit;h=e47da03c3f638c5330e0961f351d9ccf43386562
+1 from me.
Colm.
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
+1
Sergey
On 28/07/15 21:13, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release 3.0.6 and 3.1.2. We’ve fixed over 40 issues for
3.1.2.
Staging areas:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1049/
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1051/
Tags:
h
+1
Thanks, Sergey
On 27/07/15 22:26, Alessio Soldano wrote:
This is a vote to release 2.7.17. It’s been over 2 months since the
last release and we’ve fixed more than 18 issues.
Staging area:
2.7.17:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1048/
Tag:
2.7.17:
https://gi
I'll keep those methods public for now, they add a bit of a 'noise'
given that typed JWE and JWS variants are available, but the fact
JwtToken deals with base JoseHeaders is a bit of problem that needs to
be addressed separately
Sergey
On 23/07/15 10:06, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Jim, thanks for taking care of it, my fault, I'll look into it today
Sergey
On 23/07/15 06:37, Jim Ma wrote:
Hi,
I've fixed this compilation error by directly changing these methods
to public:
https://builds.apache.org/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK17/891/consoleFull
If this is something wrong, please corr
+1
On 09/07/15 22:40, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote for the XJC-Utils 3.0.4. This is mostly to release the extra
fixes we need for the bug986 plugin required to get the jetty/netty settings
properly parsed in blueprint. However, it also includes two fixes from users.
Staging repo:
http
wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/commit/aa76bda0
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tree/aa76bda0
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/diff/aa76bda0
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: aa76bda0f657d38e027e9248da7df723cc4cf8c2
Parents: 2d41042
Author: Sergey Beryozkin
Authored:
Hi,
All you need to do is to create an account with Apache JIRA, login, open
a CXF JIRA issue and attach a patch
Thanks. Sergey
+1
Cheers, Sergey
On 03/07/15 15:12, Christian Schneider wrote:
The Apache CXF DOSGi sub project implements the OSGi Remote Services and
Remote Services Admin Service specifications [1] which provide a
distributed computing model based around OSGi Services.
This release works on Apache Karaf 3
gets passed to old Service API ? Since, Java Layer is indeed acting as
proxy server.
Thanks in advance for your help !
Thanks,
Bhavesh
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
Hi
Please ask such questions on the users list,
FYI, on the client side you can experiment with JAX-RS 2.0 Client API or
configure CXF HttpConduit directly, see HttpConduit info:
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/client-http-transport-including-ssl-support.html
on the server you can get TlsSessionInfo f
-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=f0d82d6f37105d1e2c97a459fb7fe41d98e1e401
Here is my +1.
Vote will be open for 72 hours
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
the RSA Conference Demos for the last 5 years where KMIP was
used to address/test a stack of HSMs, the Yes, it is more widespread that XKMS.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyoz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:59 AM
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject:
se
beware of such customization need.
*Best Regards,*
*Yossi Cohen*
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
ls in it.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Performance-Enhancement-for-CXF-jaxrs-tp5757703p5757878.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
Hi Iris
Thanks for initiating this thread, lets start with reviewing what can we
do for optimizing the resource method selection.
Which composite key you propose for mapping a given request to a given
resource method ?
Request URI + HTTP verb + ?
I think it will probably not work with sub
nt from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
. Not sure yet but we can discuss it...
Thanks, Sergey
On 18/05/15 21:03, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Andriy
Great stuff, thanks for starting this work.
I'm actually not sure we need a tracing-core module at all.
Can we have a TracerContext in rt/management and save on introducing one
m
Hi Andriy
Great stuff, thanks for starting this work.
I'm actually not sure we need a tracing-core module at all.
Can we have a TracerContext in rt/management and save on introducing one
more module ?
Thanks, Sergey
On 18/05/15 19:25, r...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: cxf
Updated Branches:
Hi Dan - nice one , I'm feeling a bit embarrassed about my copy and
paste test 'enhancement' :-)
Will have a look at some basic generalization of the ns handler
registrations
Thanks, Sergey
On 15/05/15 17:31, dk...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: cxf
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 92ad
ling list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
Hi
Thanks for spotting it - probably a result of the copy and paste, added
a fixed as part of CXF-6393, added a Jackson test
Cheers, Sergey
On 06/05/15 13:46, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi
when using async client jaxrs api like:
.get(new InvocationCallback>() { ... }
the provider (body writ
u> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-05-06 17:20 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin :
If you set the custom property I've referred to then the runtime will
prefer that to a static Consumes/Produces. It is a CXF specific feature
Sergey
On 06/05/15 16:15, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
how
https:
t;https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-05-06 17:07 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin :
I think it is fine now, have a look at the source please...
Thanks, Sergey
On 06/05/15 16:00, Romai
tter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-05-06 16:56 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin :
Hi,
On 06/05/15 10:19, Rom
Hi,
On 06/05/15 10:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
2015-05-06 11:13 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin :
Sure, having it configurable would be one option, will take care of it.
Another option is to register a custom provider.
yes this is more or less the same since you redefine the priitive provider
ibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-05-06 10:54 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin :
Hi Romain
Looks like you have a very nice set of tests which is impressive :-)
That was a 'side-effect' of getting a spec requirement enforced. It is
about section 4.2.6,
"java.lan
Hi Romain
Looks like you have a very nice set of tests which is impressive :-)
That was a 'side-effect' of getting a spec requirement enforced. It is
about section 4.2.6,
"java.lang.Boolean , java.lang.Character , java.lang.Number Only for
text/plain"
Personally I think it is too restrictiv
+1
Thanks, Sergey
On 01/05/15 18:30, Daniel Kulp wrote:
It’s been a year since the 3.0.0 release and we’ve made a bunch of significant
improvements. We really need to get this out. :-)
This also include the latest cxf-build-utils which allows CXF to import into
the latest Eclipse plugins
+1
Cheers, Sergey
On 01/05/15 18:26, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release 3.0.5 and 2.7.16. It’s been over 2 months since the
last release and we’ve fixed more than 70 issues.
Staging areas:
2.7.16:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1039/
3.0.5:
https://r
Hi Dan,
hoping to figure out why Francesco is seeing a regression asap...
Thanks, Sergey
On 29/04/15 14:13, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I’m planning on doing builds for 2.7.16/3.0.5 and 3.1.0 tomorrow. Speak up
fast if there are issues we need to address first.
Thanks!
hod-is-not-good-tp5756610p5756692.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
Hi David
I'd like to ask you, are you still interested to see some CXF-level
integration done with Hystrix ?
Perhaps CXF Failover feature can be adjusted so that a Hystrix feature is
easily implemented on top of it,
Thanks, Sergey
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.c
One more option "/post" ?
So is it "post", "../post", or "/post" ?
Sergey
On 28/04/15 10:26, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi
Thanks for this analysis, I'm looking at the docs, example
https://jax-rs-spec.java.net/nonav/2.0-rev-a/apidocs/javax/ws/r
Hi
Thanks for this analysis, I'm looking at the docs, example
https://jax-rs-spec.java.net/nonav/2.0-rev-a/apidocs/javax/ws/rs/core/Response.html#getLink(java.lang.String)
it says:
"A relative link is resolved with respect to the actual request URI that
produced this response".
What is the
Hi - the fix has been done at the HTTP transport level
Thanks, Sergey
On 26/04/15 03:40, iris ding wrote:
CXF only calls asyncResponseImpl.setUnmappedThrowable if
the exception is thrown from ServiceInvokerInterceptor and no exception
mapper has been found for this exception:
ServiceInvokerInter
=12115db7bebfe66433eb6b5474c0455ab5c1b628
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1038/
+1 from me.
Colm.
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
Hi
Sure - please open JIRA issues to fix it.
Thanks, Sergey
On 23/04/15 15:35, venkatesham nalla wrote:
Hi
I have general question on JavaScript Web Service client support. Is
this something actively supported or experimental feature only in CXF? I
am working on JavaScript web service client
Hi Aki
Dan is off this week so may be next week it will all be finalized, may
be earlier
Cheers, Sergey
On 23/04/15 11:36, Aki Yoshida wrote:
Hi,
I see #apache-cxf available at freenode but there are much less people
in there than at #cxf at codehaus.
There are more people in #apache-camel a
Hi
You are right, thanks for spotting this issue and for your patch
Cheers, Sergey
On 20/04/15 04:17, iris ding wrote:
Hi Sergey,
Let's take a look about the implementation details in
ServiceUnavailableException.getRetryTime():
public Date getRetryTime(Date requestTime)
{
RuntimeDele
Hi - this is not a CXF issue. Most likely an initialization issue of
this exception class which is part of the JAX-RS API. NPE is used in API
a lot...
Cheers, Sergey
On 18/04/15 04:04, iris ding wrote:
Hi, I have a resource method as below:
@GET
@Path("setmethod")
public String setMethod1()
{
Hi
Thanks for your patch and sorry I forgot to mention your name in the
commit message, the fact you did a patch was appreciated.
I'm not sure to be honest what does it mean to have multiple Links
without a relationship, how would you identify which URI points to what
? May be you use some c
Hi
Interesting, we chatted with Aki where he did mention HTTP/2, and I opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6349
I guess we are about to witness a higher demand for a need to push back
to a client a high amount of data real fast. HTTP/2 can be one option
there. We will need to dis
Hi
I'm not 100% sure but perhaps in some cases the exceptions go directly
to the out fault chain, so registering a custom out fault interceptor
may help
Sergey
On 07/04/15 15:14, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
Hello,
We have implemented a set of interceptors for limiting the number of
concurrent inv
Hi Dan
On 02/04/15 16:32, Daniel Kulp wrote:
It’s been almost a year since 3.0 and I really thing we need to get 3.1 out.
We’ve done a ton of work getting some new features added in, updates to WSS4J
(and OpenSAML), bunch of JAX-RS enhancements around security, etc…
Thoughts? Other than ge
Hi Romain
Good observation, I have this JIRA opened for a while:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4826
but I got side-tracked into other work over the time...If
isReadable/isWriteable did not need to have a context info in scope then
services like below would not be affected. You can
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended
only for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed.
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
On 26/02/15 12:58, Mike Wilson wrote:
Ok, let's see if other believe TCCL usage is possible to remove altogether.
If not, I'll invest the time to create a ticket with the details of the bug.
In short, it happens when CXF logging is routed to Juli.
Do you have more details re why it breaks with J
..
Cheers, Sergey
Best regards
Mike
Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Are you dealing with some specific side-effects or would just like to
see less of TCCL in CXF ?
I agree with what Christian said - in some cases CXF needs it
as it is
not an OSGI-only framework. But if minimizing the use of TCCL is
pos
o we want spend time / efforts on that? Hystrix
integration could be interesting feature however at this point I do no
see clearly how it fits into CXF, only some rough sketches.
Thanks!
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Sergey Beryozkin mailto:sberyoz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Andriy,
ystem
test.
Thanks, Sergey
On 24/02/15 13:00, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Andriy,
David Karlsen is def not proposing to start supporting reactive client
API, it is more about about some advanced fault-tolerance support - we
should actually reply to him I guess.
Thanks for sharing a link thoug
Hi Andriy,
David Karlsen is def not proposing to start supporting reactive client
API, it is more about about some advanced fault-tolerance support - we
should actually reply to him I guess.
Thanks for sharing a link though. We will have to implement it as part
of JAX-RS 2.1 work, and we'd n
Are you dealing with some specific side-effects or would just like to
see less of TCCL in CXF ?
I agree with what Christian said - in some cases CXF needs it as it is
not an OSGI-only framework. But if minimizing the use of TCCL is
possible then I guess it is a good idea.
Sergey
On 24/02/15
Hi
On 17/02/15 10:00, David Karlsen wrote:
Hi.
We're going (gradually) from a CXF based JAX-WS world to a CXF based JAX-RS
world.
What is really good about CXF is that it can support combining both
worlds and migrating between the two well.
I have a number of Interceptors to do some custom stu
omers, I mean users of cxf 2.7
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Jason Pell wrote:
From a purely selfish point of view, I hope that 2.7 end of life is
announced well in advance, as a lot of customers will have to migrate to
3.x.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Sergey Beryozkin
wrote:
H
Hi All,
We've had a brief chat with Dan earlier about the possibility of
introducing a Java 8 trunk after it was announced JAX-RS 2.1 API would
be Java 8 based.
I'd like to justify here why IMHO this would be a very good thing for CXF:
- Java 8 is recognized to have a lot of new language fea
On 13/02/15 16:09, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 13/02/15 15:54, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Can you release WSS4J 2.1 by the end of May/early June (3.5-4 months) ?
At this point I can't commit to it. So I will hold off on updating CXF
tru
having the first 3.1.0 6 months from now would probably
mean there will be only single 3.1.x release this year, not sure.
Sergey
Colm.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Sergey Beryozkin
wrote:
On 13/02/15 14:28, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Any thoughts on a CXF 3.1 release date? I'm
On 13/02/15 14:28, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Any thoughts on a CXF 3.1 release date? I'm updating WSS4J 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT
to use OpenSAML 3.0.x, and would like to merge the corresponding fixes to
CXF trunk. However, WSS4J 2.1 will probably not be released for at least
4-6 months or so I'd imagine,
+1
Sergey
On 12/02/15 01:53, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release 3.0.4 and 2.7.15. It’s been about 2 months since the
last release and we’ve fixed more than 70 issues.
Staging areas:
2.7.15:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1036/
3.0.4:
https://repositor
Hi
On 31/01/15 06:48, ellen wrote:
Hi dear all,
We plan use CXF to develop our JAX-RS 2.0 web service. But I would like to
know first:
Does CXF pass TCK for JAX-RS 2.0, I didn't see it in the page or forum.
If not, do you know when you plan to run the TCK test and get result?
The info is her
Hi Dan
On 27/01/15 18:00, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Chatted with Alessio about this on IRC. It looks like a bug in the JDK
introduced in Java7 update 40. A bug was logged:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044726
but then closed a non-reproducible. Alessio will look into seeing if that c
Hi
Please forward such queries to the users list.
CXF reports whatever is coming in, it may be GET after all.
The best way to 100% validate CXF does not confuse GET with DELETE is to
get your client request passed through some TCP trace utility.
Sergey
On 27/01/15 08:44, jordan wrote:
And I th
Hi Andriy
I've looked at IssuedTokenInterceptorProvider, I'm not sure how much
self-contained code we can reuse from that interceptor.
How would a JAXRS client interceptor would look like ? I guess it should
invoke on STSClient and set a SAML assertion on the current message ?
Thanks, Serge
Hi Aki
On 22/01/15 11:02, Aki Yoshida wrote:
Hi Sergey,
2015-01-22 11:27 GMT+01:00 Sergey Beryozkin :
Hi Aki
Not sure about configuring this plugin, may be an alternative plugin exists
which can do the same but also accept the proxy properties ?
In fact, I also tried codehaus' wagon-
Hi Aki
Not sure about configuring this plugin, may be an alternative plugin
exists which can do the same but also accept the proxy properties ?
The other possible option for doing the local builds without the
internet access, predownload this file and update the build to check the
file from
Hi Thorsten, All,
I've updated OAuth2 SessionAuthenticityTokenProvider interface on the
trunk.
The reason for that is that at the moment the only way for
Redirection-based services to return the redirection state as part of
the authorization decision is to use form hidden fields. That would
i
+1
Sergey
On 03/12/14 16:20, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.14 and 3.0.3. These versions fix a bunch of
bugs users have encountered. They also provide some additional functionality
to make it easier to configure various SSL/TLS things to mitigate various
attacks.
Stag
Have a look please at the latest commit - that should work...
Cheers, Sergey
On 04/12/14 10:08, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Freeman
Thanks, after looking at this code I've realized we can revert the
changes to CXFActivator too - those classes Spring Osgi deals with are
only making sense in
Hi Freeman
Thanks, after looking at this code I've realized we can revert the
changes to CXFActivator too - those classes Spring Osgi deals with are
only making sense in OSGi so we can further polish the code - I'll play
a bit later on and let you know about the changes...
Cheers, Sergey
On
.
ClasspathScanner, when instantiated, can figure out if it runs in OSGi
and create the right classpath scanner delegate (so
JAXRSServerFactoryBeanDefiniti__onParser will stay unchanged).
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Sergey Beryozkin mailto:sberyoz
Hi Freeman
Thanks for this effort, I did a minor update to avoid updating all of
ClasspathScanner client code (JAX-RS server & client for now - but
possibly JAXWS Spring parsers in the future too).
Dan may likely have more comments but for now I have a couple of questions,
- is FrameworkUtil.g
mean something is incompatible with some Ubuntu or JDK version?
If Jason has a green light after rerunning with JDK 1.7.0_67 then I
guess it would be narrow it down to an earlier JDK.
Cheers, Sergey
2014-12-01 11:35 GMT+01:00 Sergey Beryozkin :
Hi
I've just tried, the test is OK, Ub
Hi
I've just tried, the test is OK, Ubuntu 14.04, Java 7 patch 67.
Can you please retry with the latest Java 7 patch ?
Thanks, Sergey
On 01/12/14 03:11, Jason Pell wrote:
With both Java 6 (patch 37) and Java 7 (patch 60)
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Jason Pell wrote:
I get the following
Sonatype/Codehaus team has resolved it so I'll have the commit coming in
shortly
Sergey
On 28/11/14 10:49, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi,
I got stuck this morning with releasing Jettison 1.3.7 which is needed
to address a JAXRS JSONProvider improvement issue. I was actually about
to relea
Hi,
I got stuck this morning with releasing Jettison 1.3.7 which is needed
to address a JAXRS JSONProvider improvement issue. I was actually about
to release it yesterday, created a staging repo, but postponed till this
morning to finalize the release and now I'm stuck with Codehauz Nexus
req
+1
Cheers, Sergey
On 14/11/14 16:33, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release version 3.0.3 of the XJC utils. The only changes in
this release are related to getting it working better on Windows. On Windows,
in fork mode, many the paths and such passed into the forked process did not
Hi
On 05/11/14 14:40, Daniel Kulp wrote:
For 3.1, I’m thinking about removing the dependencies on spring and spring-dm from
the features.xml file. Right now, if you do a "feature:install cxf”, you
would get spring 3.2 and spring-dm forcibly installed even if you don’t need either
of them.
+1
Sergey
On 17/10/14 11:52, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.1.2.
Issues fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FEDIZ/fixforversion/12327120
Tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf-fediz.git;a=commit;h=1b9d21736408bb95449731e9fe31eebe4e
ox/cxf-dev/201410.mbox/%3c7ff6ea5d-c62a-42fc-9ad4-c58f813ed...@gmail.com%3E
On 08/10/14 21:02, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
+1
Cheers, Sergey
On 08/10/14 18:30, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90
JIRA issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot.
T
We've had 11 binding votes and one non binding vote, all +1.
This vote passes and I'm going to promote the artifacts on behalf of Dan
Cheers, Sergey
On 07/10/14 21:26, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
+1
Cheers, Sergey
On 07/10/14 20:59, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.6.
Hi
On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
Hi,
Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is there
requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for
application server? Thanks.
Spec for EJB support:
In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST
+1
Cheers, Sergey
On 08/10/14 18:30, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA
issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot.
Tags:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=3ec631c97e9eccf62490b176aab61044b3b9ab9f
https://git-wip-
Hi
Redirecting to the users list
Apparently supporting overlapping addresses was causing issues in other
cases where the Jetty transport was used and it was restricted in 3.0.1.
CXF 3.0.2 (the release process is about to start) has a
"org.apache.cxf.transports.http_jetty.DontCheckUrl" system
Hi Dan,
The demo issue has been sorted out, sorry about it,
Cheers, Sergey
On 08/10/14 02:11, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Just an follow up…
I was able to fix all the java5 issues and build 2.6.15 and the vote is
started.2.7.13 is built and staged, but I want to look at the staging real
quick bef
+1
Cheers, Sergey
On 07/10/14 20:59, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.6.16. This release is JUST to fix the
problems running 2.6.15 with Java5. All the changes between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16
are directly related to getting it to build, run, and test with Java5. This
does inc
Hi
Luigi (FH Koln) suggested some good refactoring ideas for the original
oauth2-jwt module, now named oauth2-jose. Specifically, he correctly
pointed out that JWE/JWT is not depending on OAuth2 works, but it is the
other way around where OAuth2 applications may use JWT tokens for a
variety o
Hi
Besides that I've started applying the patches on behalf of the FH-Köln
research team, I hope we will see a lot of contributions coming from
them going forward
Cheers, Sergey
On 30/09/14 15:26, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
Hi Jan,
Sergei is developing this topic very active in CXF now.
CXF has
segments composed together with only the the public parts of
such an URI contributing to the public endpoint URI; it is indeed
another unique idea to be explored :-)
Thanks, Sergey
On 25/09/14 15:18, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 25/09/14 15:07, Christian Schneider wrote:
On 25.09.2014 12:44
On 25/09/14 15:07, Christian Schneider wrote:
On 25.09.2014 12:44, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Christian
On 25/09/14 08:51, Christian Schneider wrote:
Having one servlet per bundle would definately work.
I see two problems though:
- Each servlet has its own base path where all services reside
it is becoming supported in Felix/etc
Thanks, Sergey
Christian
On 24.09.2014 15:12, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 24/09/14 13:42, Christian Schneider wrote:
I would like to deploy two (or more) CXF based applications into the
same OSGi framework.
How can I enforce common rules per application
On 24/09/14 13:42, Christian Schneider wrote:
I would like to deploy two (or more) CXF based applications into the
same OSGi framework.
How can I enforce common rules per application while keeping the
applications separate from each other?
I created a wiki page to show the scenario and describe
This is a question for the users list, use outDropElements to completely
remove a given element
Cheers, Sergey
On 23/09/14 16:39, Nee wrote:
I wanted to remove a tag from the request xml using the below transformation
feature.But it doest not work.If I change the tag nameits working but give em
Hi
On 23/09/14 06:15, jordan wrote:
Hi Sergey,
Great thanks for your quickly response again! :)
I see you said in the end"
"Yes, if we talk about a JAX-RS 2.0 client invocation path, given that
the documentation for Client API does not require defaulting to some
specific media type if Accept is
-is-application-xml-tp5749057.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
301 - 400 of 1543 matches
Mail list logo