2010 11:49:33 am dav...@apache.org wrote:
Author: davidb
Date: Fri Dec 10 16:49:33 2010
New Revision: 1044430
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1044430view=rev
Log:
Reverting system test change which apparently only applies to Maven 3 while
Hudson seems to be using 2.x
Modified:
cxf
Hi Eoghan,
On 17 July 2010 12:59, Eoghan Glynn eogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Eoghan would you have some cycles?
Yeah.
Excellent!
A couple of things before I go ahead and cut the release:
- can you update the release notes[1] with a summary of what's new in this
release?
Done.
- does this
Hi Eoghan,
All I can say is that the system tests always work fine on my machine
and that they also work fine on Hudson...
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/CXF/job/CXF-DOSGi/
Having said that, it's always a little tricky to get system tests
right for all machines as there are so many
Sorry that should have said CXF 2.2.9.
The commit is good, the message has the typo.
Unfortunately no
svn commit --amend
yet...
David
On 16 July 2010 13:46, dav...@apache.org wrote:
Author: davidb
Date: Fri Jul 16 12:46:10 2010
New Revision: 964787
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
Hi all,
One of the things to-do for the DOSGi refactoring work that's
currently happening on trunk is to re-enable the system tests.
Now both Sergey and I have been fighting with the spring-osgi based
testing system that's there before and I can tell you it's generally
no fun at all. The biggest
Yeah - I think its a good idea to put CXF DOSGi as a separate project in JIRA.
Thanks,
David
2009/12/17 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
Is there any objections to moving the DOSGI stuff out to it's own JIRA? If
not, I'll do so on Friday. Speak now... :-)
Dan
On Mon December 14 2009
2009/12/17 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
I've set it up:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI
Nice!
On a related note, should we have a separate DOSGi space on the wiki as well
like we do for the docs? It could then have it's own navigation bar,
etc
The top level page at
+1
David
2009/12/3 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
Cyrille has submitted several patches to various management and logging
related things for CXF starting way back in February. I think he's up to 7
or 8 submitted patches. He's also been hanging around the user list for
almost a year
Big +1 from me!
David
2009/11/25 Eoghan Glynn eogl...@gmail.com:
Folks,
I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.1.
The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of the
Remote Services Specification version 1.0, Chapter 13 in the OSGi Compendium
+1
David
2009/11/15 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.5
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.2.4 release. Over 90 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.2.5
List of issues:
The Maven staging
+1
David
2009/10/8 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.4
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.2.3 release. Over 59 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.2.4.
List of issues:
Hi all,
The CXF DOSGi builds have started failing this morning with the
message below. Previously they were building fine. Does anyone know
what happened to the abera 0.4.0-incubating dependencies which come in
via the cxf-minimal bundle?
See:
+1
David
2009/5/22 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.2
With only 23 JIRA's resolved for 2.2.2, this doesn't have as many fixes as
many of the previous patch releases. HOWEVER, there is a one major new
feature: the JAX-RS 1.0 TCK now passes. Thus, it's
+1
David
2009/5/7 Eoghan Glynn eogl...@gmail.com:
Folks,
I'm calling a second vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
The main differences between this and the first take are:
- addition of a sources distro
- LICENSE file now contains references to licenses for 3rd party dependencies
+1
David
2009/5/1 Eoghan Glynn eogl...@gmail.com:
Folks,
I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
Specification[1].
The staging area can
Hi all,
I've been doing some work regarding CXF-1966, removing the Equinox
jars and moving the system tests to use Felix 1.4.1. It now works with
Spring 1.2.0-rc2-SNAPSHOT.
As Eoghan says, there is still the missing functionality around the
versions in the ServicePublication. The impact here is
Great to hear about the JAXRS component for DOSGi, Sergey!
What is the expected release timeframe of CXF 2.2.1?
If its a bit further out, why not do a DOSGi 1.0 release based on CXF
2.2 and then do another 1.1 release with the JAXRS stuff as soon as
2.2.1 is out?
Cheers,
David
2009/3/26 Sergey
+1
David Bosschaert
+1
David Bosschaert
+1
David Bosschaert
2009/2/3 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.4
With a longer than normal cycle, a LOT of stuff is in this. Over 88 JIRA
issues are resolved for 2.1.3 which is quite a bit of work.
List of issues:
Hi all,
Currently all of the bugs against the Distributed OSGi code are filed
in the 'OSGi' component in CXF. However I think this is potentially
confusing as the 'OSGi' component really hints to me that it relates
to OSGi properties of core CXF (e.g. the way OSGi metadata is added to
21 matches
Mail list logo
