have a
RequestSecurityTokenResponseCollection. The RequestSecurityTokenResponse
element is directly in the response. Since the STSClient is designed to work
for both 1.0 and 1.3, we have to support both. THAT said, we could check
which namespace is being used and adjust accordingly.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
javax.xml.stream*;version="${cxf.osgi.javax.stream.version}",
>> -com.sun.tools*;resolution:=optional,
>> + javax.xml.stream*;version="${cxf.osgi.javax.stream.version}"
>>
>>
>>
>> @@ -116,10 +115,6 @@
>> jaxb-impl
>>
>>
>> -com.sun.xml.bind
>> -jaxb-xjc
>> -
>> -
>> ${cxf.asm.groupId}
>> ${cxf.asm.artifactId}
>> true
>>
>>
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
ce service = new MyService();
BusFactory.setThreadDefaultBus(orig);
with just:
MyService service = new MyService(myBus);
which should definitely help make sure the correct configuration gets picked up.
Anyway, thoughts are welcome.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
time calls into the Bus to get the
extension of that interface (either bus.getExtension(Interface.class) or via
the ConfiguredBeanLocator), it should find it in the OSGi services.
Dan
>
> Regards,
> Andrei.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Kulp [
rovider works.
>
> Seems that both mechanisms are not really equal.
> Any suggestions where I can dig?
>
> Regards,
> Andrei.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Freitag, 23. August 2013 15:29
>> To:
ever).
Dan
>
> Regards,
> Andrei.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Montag, 26. August 2013 20:03
>> To: Andrei Shakirin
>> Cc: dev@cxf.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: extensions dynamically added/rem
rty(key = "mtom-enabled", value =
> "true")
> +})
> +public class TestProvider implements Provider {
> +
> +private String successRsp = " xmlns:ns2=\"http://cxf.apache.org/\";>"
> ++ "Hello CXF" +
> "";
> +
> +public SAXSource invoke(SAXSource request) {
> +return new SAXSource(new InputSource(new StringReader(successRsp)));
> +}
> +}
>
> Propchange:
> cxf/trunk/systests/uncategorized/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/systest/mtom_schema_validation/TestProvider.java
> --
>svn:eol-style = native
>
> Propchange:
> cxf/trunk/systests/uncategorized/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/systest/mtom_schema_validation/TestProvider.java
> --
>svn:keywords = Rev Date
>
> Added:
> cxf/trunk/systests/uncategorized/src/test/resources/wsdl_systest/mtom_provider_validate.wsdl
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/systests/uncategorized/src/test/resources/wsdl_systest/mtom_provider_validate.wsdl?rev=1518175&view=auto
> ==
> ---
> cxf/trunk/systests/uncategorized/src/test/resources/wsdl_systest/mtom_provider_validate.wsdl
> (added)
> +++
> cxf/trunk/systests/uncategorized/src/test/resources/wsdl_systest/mtom_provider_validate.wsdl
> Wed Aug 28 12:12:30 2013
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +
> +http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http";
> xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/";
> xmlns:tns="http://cxf.apache.org/";
> xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; name="HelloWS"
> targetNamespace="http://cxf.apache.org/";>
> +
> +http://www.w3.org/2005/05/xmlmime";
> xmlns:ns1="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http";
> xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/";
> xmlns:tns="http://cxf.apache.org/";
> xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";
> xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="unqualified"
> targetNamespace="http://cxf.apache.org/";>
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + +
> xmime:expectedContentTypes="application/octet-stream" />
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +
> + http://localhost:9003/mtom/provider"/>
> +
> +
> +
>
> Propchange:
> cxf/trunk/systests/uncategorized/src/test/resources/wsdl_systest/mtom_provider_validate.wsdl
> --
>svn:eol-style = native
>
> Propchange:
> cxf/trunk/systests/uncategorized/src/test/resources/wsdl_systest/mtom_provider_validate.wsdl
> --
>svn:keywords = Rev Date
>
> Propchange:
> cxf/trunk/systests/uncategorized/src/test/resources/wsdl_systest/mtom_provider_validate.wsdl
> --
>svn:mime-type = text/xml
>
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
ingOperationInfo is always created with JAXWS namespace regardless WSDL.
> Could someone help to explain why we need two instances of
> BindingOperationInfo? and why this impact policy attachment?
>
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
nsulting <http://www.sosnoski.com/consult.html>
>> CXF and Web Services Security Training
>> <http://www.sosnoski.com/training.html>
>> Web Services Jump-Start <http://www.sosnoski.com/jumpstart.html>
>>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
rea
>
>
>
> Andrea Messina
>
> Blue Reply
> Via Cardinal Massaia, 83
> 10147 - Torino - ITALY
> phone: +39 011 29100
> a.mess...@reply.it
> www.reply.it
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> The information transmitted is intended for the pers
; 10147 - Torino - ITALY
> phone: +39 011 29100
> a.mess...@reply.it
> www.reply.it
>
>
>
>
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
> Sent: martedì 3 settembre 2013 18:10
> To: dev@cxf.apache.org; Messina Andrea
> Subject: {Disarmed} Re: Apache
le bit, etc…
The downside being a lot of cxf-*.jar's in the distribution's lib directory.
If this is too much of a downside, we could keep the "all" bundle, but I'd
recommend removing all the OSGi stuff from it so there is no confusion that
this is not for OSGi.
Dan
>
> Thanks again,
> Andrea
>
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Messina Andrea wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel.
>>
>> Spring is version 2.5.0.
>> Why should a minor version update (from 2_6_7 to 2_6_9) require a Spring
>>
first.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
r
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Open Source Architect
> http://www.talend.com
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
s-2.6.0/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.6.10
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.7.7
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
signature.asc
Description: Messag
Dan
On Sep 14, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to 2.6.10.
>
> This also includes an update release of our build-utils to get the PMD stuff
> needed to work with the latest Eclipse.
>
&
staging areas.
This releases are tagged at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/build-utils/tags/cxf-build-utils-2.6.0/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.6.10
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.7.7
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apac
The intro gives some points
>> Le 22 sept. 2013 01:29, "David Blevins" a écrit :
>>
>>> Putting together some information on Apache and Java EE 7 for JavaOne next
>>> week.
>>>
>>> There any information on JAX-RS 2.0 status?
>>>
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
We have 14 +1 votes (most are binding) and no other votes. This vote passes.
I'll promote the artifacts.
Dan
On Sep 18, 2013, at 1:08 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to
> 2.6.10. This sec
> document is not .
>>
>> this looks like perhaps there is a spring schemas mapping missing?
>>
>> I have lowered the logging for now so that I don't see the WARN, but
>> wondered if anyone was aware why I would be seeing this now.
>>
>> I am b
-1.0.xsd
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd
http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd
Dan
On Sep 24, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Ran into this yesterday while trying to diag
> problem in 2.7.7 when I ran those spring based unit tests without the
> network. And we were using a relative path in some schemas (e.g.,
> wsrm-manager.xsd) for a long time.
>
> regards, aki
>
>
>
>
>
> 2013/9/24 Daniel Kulp :
>>
>> Erg…. copy
Proxy.invoke(JaxWsClientProxy.java:133)
> ~[cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws-2.7.5.jar:2.7.5]
>... 9 common frames omitted
> /
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CXF-and-xstream-Unmarshalling-Error-tp5734429.html
> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
how the JBoss integration is
dealing with the JaxWsEndpointImpl.I'm certainly very open to making the
handler chain invocation more customizable, but it's more a matter of "how".
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
t;> From: Andrei Shakirin [mailto:ashaki...@talend.com]
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 10:20
>> To: Daniel Kulp; dev@cxf.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: extensions dynamically added/removed from exited bus
>>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Just confirm that proposed
t/ws/rm/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/ws/rm/RMEndpoint.java?rev=1531258&r1=1531257&r2=1531258&view=diff
> basically the setPolicies() method
>
> - Dennis
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
uld modify some of the properties.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
}
>
> It looks like EndpointImpl only maps to one bean. I think I am doing it
> wrong.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/How-to-get-jaxws-endpoint-object-at-the-server-during-initialization-code-first-approach-tp
context:
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/How-to-get-jaxws-endpoint-object-at-the-server-during-initialization-code-first-approach-tp5735370p5735473.html
> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
tch would be most
useful.
Dan
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/How-to-get-jaxws-endpoint-object-at-the-server-during-initialization-code-first-approach-tp5735370p5735486.html
> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing
id calulateDefaultBasePath(Server server) {
> +String address = server.getEndpoint().getEndpointInfo().getAddress();
> +if (getBasePath() == null || getBasePath().length() == 0) {
> +if (address.startsWith("http")) {
> +setBasePath(address + "/api-docs");
> +} else {
> +setBasePath("http://localhost:8181/cxf"; + address +
> "/api-docs");
> +}
> +}
> +}
Where did the "http://localhost:8181/cxf” value come from?
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
t; Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
> Twitter: freemanfang
> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>
>
>
> On 2013-11-8, at 下午2:51, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>> Freeman,
>>
>> I have
.transport.udp.UDPDestination$MCastListener$2.run(UDPDestination.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.cxf.workqueue.AutomaticWorkQueueImpl$3.run(AutomaticWorkQueueImpl.java:428)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:895)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:918)
> at
> org.apache.cxf.workqueue.AutomaticWorkQueueImpl$AWQThreadFactory$1.run(AutomaticWorkQueueImpl.java:353)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
nInfo.class);
>>>if (soi == null || action.equals(soi.getAction())) {
>>> return;
>>>}
>>>
>>> Will be:
>>>
>>> SoapOperationInfo soi = boi.getExtensor(SoapOperationInfo.class);
>>>if ((soi == null) || StringUtils.isEmpty(soi.getAction()) ||
>> action.equals(soi.getAction())) {
>>>return;
>>>}
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Andrei.
>>>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
tion.
Yea, per spec the SOAPAction and WSA:Action have to be equal.However, per
Basic Profile, in that case, the WSDL should reflect that via the wasm:Action.
It sounds like you’re enabling addressing without the service side having
knowledge of the addressing.
Dan
>
>
to some changes.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
releases are tagged at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.6.11
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.7.8
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
signature.as
:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-160/
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-161/
Here is my +1. Vote open till Monday.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
af
>apache-cxf
>${project.version}
>pom
>test
>
>
> changed the execution order so that the fresh install runs. And I
> wanted to ask if I should make this change to trunk, 2,7.x et al or we
> should come up with ano
We have 13 +1 votes and no other votes. This vote passes.
Dan
On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to 2.6.11.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.6.11
> https://issues.apache.org/ji
My own +1
Dan
On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to 2.6.11.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.6.11
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&ve
We have 11 +1 votes and no other votes. This vote passes.
Dan
On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:28 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We’ve done quite a lot of work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to do,
> I think it’s a good idea to get a stable milestone release out that users can
>
tag. Thus, the tag would be properly buildable.
2) Do another deploy/vote of JUST the distribution section. That will then
use the released jars from central and build the proper release zip.
Any objections, please let me know ASAP.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
-3.0.0-milestone1/distribution
Here is my +1
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
We have 10 binding +1 votes and a couple of other +1s. I’ll promote the
artifacts.
Dan
On Nov 26, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> This is a vote for the actually distributions to go along with the
> 3.0.0-milestone1 release that is already in central.
>
> Stagin
Due to the US holiday, I wasn’t able to send this out last week, but better
late than never… :-)
The Apache CXF team is proud to announce the availability of the latest patch
releases: 2.7.8 and 2.6.11 as well as the release of the first milestone
release toward CXF 3.0.0.
2.7.8 and 2.6.11 a
ost part, CXF always streams things and as long as you don’t
ask for them in a way that would require them to be buffered, you should be all
set.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
t spark some discussion, I’d still suggest starting a
discussion or at least sending a “I’m thinking about this idea…” type message
to dev@cxf.apache.org.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
ched.
>
> I think the original schemas always had the absolute URLs for their
> imports. So, making this change means that we can put the unmodified
> schemas in the local resources folder and let the catalog and
> blueprint handler to do the resolution.
>
> Should we make this change or will there be some concern or
> alternative approach?
>
> thanks.
> regards, aki
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
are already using the absolute URLs and they are
>> working also for offline, if some issue occurs after this change, that
>> likely just means we forgot to include that particular URL in the BP's
>> ns-handler's schema map. Then, we can fix it there.
>>
>>
e need another milestone or not. I’m
hoping not.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Open Source Architect
> http://www.talend.com
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
; Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
> (English)
> http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
>
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Schneider
>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>
>>> Open Source Architect
>>> http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>
epo which sucks with git. I’m
really not sure how much of the history and tags from 2005/2006 is at all
important anymore so this is likely not a big deal. Plus, the history is
still in SVN if we really need it.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Communi
On Jan 22, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
> On 22/01/14 15:30, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> Few thoughts though:
>>
>> 1) Lets wait until after at least milestone2. We’re close and I don’t want
>> to screw any of that up.
>>
>> 2) I’d LIKE to rebui
initely getting into more advanced git stuff though. I’m not advanced
enough with it to really know. :-(
Dan
>
> Christian
>
> Am 22.01.2014 15:40, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
>> Anyone who is a committer will be able to “push” changes into the canonical
>> repo here
or = new GreeterImplMultiPort();
> address = "http://localhost:"; + PORT + "/MultiPort/GreeterPort";
> eps.add(Endpoint.publish(address, implementor));
> @@ -146,6 +156,33 @@ public class Server extends AbstractBusT
> }
> }
>
> +@WebServiceProvider
> +@Service
On Jan 22, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> 2) I’d LIKE to rebuild the git repo and possibly remove all the /incubator
> revisions and tags. Kind of “start” at the graduation. Maybe a bit before
> at the 2.0-incubator release. Or at least all the “lib” d
t better
than the pure svn dump version we’ve been using.
Dan
>
>
> Am 23.01.2014 19:05, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
>> On Jan 22, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 2) I’d LIKE to rebuild the git repo and possibly remove all the /incubator
&
go read-only for some period of
time before we have the git repo fully setup. Thus, we may be stuck for a day
or two.
Dan
>
> Christian
>
>
> On 24.01.2014 15:35, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Thorsten Höger wrote:
>>
>>> Some comme
I’d like to go ahead and release 2.7.9/2.6.12 this week. Probably do the
builds tomorrow. We can then concentrate on getting 3.0-m2 out in early Feb.
Any objections? Anything else need merging to 2.7.x/2.6.x before the builds?
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
releases are tagged at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.6.12
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.7.9
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
gt;
> Best regards
>
> Christian
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Open Source Architect
> http://www.talend.com
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
For the record: my +1
Dan
On Jan 29, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> We've resolved over 60 issues since 2.7.8 and almost 40 ported back to 2.6.12.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.6.12
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projec
We have 12 +1 votes, 10 binding. This vote passes.
I’ll get the artifacts promoted.
Dan
On Jan 29, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> We've resolved over 60 issues since 2.7.8 and almost 40 ported back to 2.6.12.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.6.12
> h
that have been opened that I’d like to take a quick look at.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.7.10
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Due to an issue Colm found, I’m canceling this and will rebuild.
Dan
On Feb 4, 2014, at 10:08 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release 2.7.10. This is mostly to fix the JAX-WS 2.2
> problems in the 2.7.9 release that would not allow it to work as a 2.2
> runtime.
reviews prior to that, I think we’re OK. (providing I get the 3 votes by
tomorrow. :) )
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
(+1 from me)
With my +1, we have 8 binding +1 votes. I’ll get the artifacts promoted.
Dan
On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> This is a vote to release 2.6.13 and 2.7.10.
>
> For 2.7.10, this is mostly to fix the JAX-WS 2.2 problems in the 2.7.9
ent.java:252)
>at
> com.sun.xml.wss.jaxws.impl.SecurityTubeBase.verifyInboundMessage(SecurityTubeBase.java:455)
>at
> com.sun.xml.wss.jaxws.impl.SecurityServerTube.processRequest(SecurityServerTube.java:295)
>
> It's certainly best practice to sign the WS-A headers, but AFAIK it isn't
> r
:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1012/
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-3.0.0-milestone2
The vote will be open for 24 hours.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
We have 10 +1 votes and no other votes. This vote passes.
I’ll get artifacts released.
Dan
On Feb 14, 2014, at 9:01 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release 3.0.0-milestone2
>
> This has a bunch of more updates targeting 3.0 including a fully revamped JMS
branches. That should make it a bit easier as there will only be a single
branch to worry about re-syncing after the switch.
Thanks!
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We seem to have had consensus to flip to git after the milestone2 release.
> Now that that is out, I’m going to start that process. It may take a few
> days as we need to run a bunch of commands on the current repo to clean it
> out
!
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
e tomorrow to get that updated. I’ll also get
ohloh updated tomorrow.
Dan
On Feb 18, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Just an FYI: trunk/branches/tags in SVN are now readonly.
>
> The new repo is now live at:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/
>
> Colm.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
>> Just a couple notes:
>>
>> 1) Everyone please clone the new repo and make sure it works for you.
>> I'm hoping no one will have any issues with it.
>>
sub things to allow for more “trigger
based” services.
See:
https://www.apache.org/dev/gitpubsub.html
of information about the gitpubsub service.
Dan
>
> Thanks,
> Eirik.
>
> [1] Yes, SVNSearch was a bad choice of name :-)
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Daniel
them a quick look through to make sure they are all OK. If
so, I’ll set the those parts are read-only in SVN and we’ll be completely git
for everything except the website.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
.6.x/4408/#showFailuresLink
>>
>>
>> --
>> Willem Jiang
>>
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> Web: http://www.redhat.com
>> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>> http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
>> Twitter: willemjiang
>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
ibernate, Second
> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> T
ovide a stack trace? The
PostConstruct should be called providing it’s CXF creating the handler and not
spring or similar. Would like to see which code path is calling into the
constructor.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
CONTEXT, REQUEST_CONTEXT and
> RESPONSE_CONTEXT are present
> // on message
> -----
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> Alessio
>
> --
> Alessio Soldano
> Web Service Lead, JBoss
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
EIVE_TIMEOUT);
> ...
> }
>
> Similar thing for the connection timeout.
>
> Alessio
>
> On 24/03/14 14:40, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm wondering if there's a
first one makes a lot of sense now. If 64K was OK 5 years ok, I would think
128K would be OK now. Not really sure on the second one. Thoughts?
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
.
Never got Java5 working on my Mac. :-) That said, it’s also the only
branch we currently have that support JAX-RS 1.1.
Thoughts on the above?
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
formal JAX-RS 2.0
> compliance due to the fact that the final JAX-RS 2.0 TCK has not been
> available to Apache.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
ined = new ProxyClassLoader(loader, interfaces);
> for (Class currentInterface : interfaces) {
> combined.addLoader(currentInterface.getClassLoader());
> }
>
> Thanks
> Alessio
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/cxf?cs=3898dbb3e29202c0d2942fb903fa29a7c16418a7
>
> --
> Alessio Soldano
> Web Service Lead, JBoss
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
cxf.apache.org/docs for the main docs
and the appropriate javadoc dir for javadoc? That may be the most appropriate
since we don’t include any “real” docs in the distribution anyway, just the
javadocs.
Thoughts?
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder
On Apr 1, 2014, at 4:20 PM, David Karlsen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Could you publish the milestone javadocs like for other releases so they
> are easily browsable?
I just dropped the latest snapshot javadocs at:
http://cxf.apache.org/javadoc/latest-3.0.x/
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apach
anks for the catch.
> There's a few minor typos and spelling errors on the site, too. Are you
> interested in getting a copyediting feedback list or patch?
If you submit an iCLA to Apache:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
we can grant your Confluence account edit access and yo
).
Thus, we could easily add links to download the full thing if wanted to.
The latest 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT javadocs are now on the website:
http://cxf.apache.org/javadoc/latest-3.0.x/
Dan
On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> For 2.x, we basically generated 2 different s
; -registry.addDestination(d);
> -configure(bus, d);
> -d.finalizeConfig();
> +return d;
> }
> -return d;
> +} finally {
> +r.unlock();
> }
> }
>
>
> The read/write lock stuff is required to prevent anybody from trying to use
> the registry while its reference is being modified, but might be considered
> too much of a preventive measure and avoided if we simply assume and document
> that the registry can be modified only before starting using it.
> WDYT? Perhaps is this "issue" going to be addressed in a more general way?
>
> Thanks
> Alessio
>
> --
> Alessio Soldano
> Web Service Lead, JBoss
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
releases we do from git. I’m hoping everything “just
works”, but we’ll have to see.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1015/
Tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=6c4a45138976c7c7b770fdaa979cd0eddb2449c6
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=0d3b94e213446763d348fb07c51e71fe00fa3151
This vote will be open for 72 hours.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk
ectionUtils$PropertyDescriptor.set(ReflectionUtils.java:378)
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BeanRecipe.setProperty(BeanRecipe.java:939)
> ... 49 more
>
> The same scenario runs fine with cxf 2.7.10.
> The spring version of the same scenario runs fine with 2.7.11
Looks like a bunch of the blueprint parsing might be a bit flakey with these
builds. Certainly the Camel tests are not passing with it. I’m canceling and
will rebuild.
Dan
On Apr 6, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> It’s been 2 months since the last releases… This is a v
501 - 600 of 2147 matches
Mail list logo
