Re: Comparing Floating Point numbers

As someone who did Fortran for over 30 using code libraries some written 60 years ago. The epsilon approach is baked in. I think there are methods in some Java test frameworks where you can do an Assert that will automatically handle epsilon internally. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On

Re: Drill+Daffodil ... Fwd: Talk not accepted for Community over Code 2023

You’ve had a good run of Apachecon talks. This year was trully a blind review. 1. What track did you submit your talk to? 2. Think about turning your talk into a blog post. 3. Look for a local meetup. 4. Go to the conference. It looks like AI is going to shift the “landscape”! Best, Dave Sent

Re: GPG signature verification warnings

49EC0374262C7110CA74404A735FC1A36AE84 > gpg: Good signature from "John Interrante (Code Signing Key) > " [ultimate] > > I haven't participated in a key signing party and I'm not sure where I would > get a trust chain to import into my key ring to verify Mike's signature &

Re: GPG signature verification warnings

Mike you probably participated in a Keysigning party and John has not. Look up keysigning on www.Apache.org and have a “party” to sign his key. If that’s not possible right now that’s ok. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 18, 2022, at 1:27 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote: > > When verifying GPG

Log4j 2.16.0 a more complete fix to Log4Shell

https://lists.apache.org/thread/d6v4r6nosxysyq9rvnr779336yf0woz4

Re: Hex editor operations

There’s a guy with hex editor trying to see if he can make it into a community. https://lists.apache.org/thread/5cbcmfw08002p5ttgyd43kt4vq4c17o8 https://bined.exbin.org/ I’m not sure if this fits Daffodil’s needs but it could be interesting. Regards, Dave > On Nov 4, 2021, at 12:51 PM, Larry

Re: Main development branch name change?

Does the project wish to add these repositories to clc.diversity.apache.org? If so then send an email to d...@diversity.apache.org > On Sep 2, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > I opened a ticket with INFRA and this has been completed. The master > branch has been renamed to 'main'

Re: all this github spam ?

Infra has setup some controls which may be useful. There is support for an .asf.yaml file. See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=127405038#content/view/127405038 Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 21, 2021, at 5:59 AM, Beckerle, Mike > wrote: > >

[OFFTOPIC] Re: Acceptance criteria for merging DFDL-to-C backend (runtime2-2202)?

Hi Chris, Try building OpenOffice … macOS, Windows, Linux, and downstream FreeBSD, OS/2 …. Older c++, two different build tools, patched dependencies. ;-) Regards, Dave > On Mar 11, 2021, at 12:51 PM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > Hi John, > > the script is here: >

Re: Infrastructure Transition from incubator to TLP

Hi - > On Feb 18, 2021, at 9:32 AM, Beckerle, Mike > wrote: > > The infra ticket for migrating our project infrastructure from incubator to > TLP is > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21438 > > Which you may want to watch. (Don't have to. I'm watching it.) > > They will do

Graduation! Congratulations!

Hooray Daffodil! Today the Board of Directors passed the Daffodil Resolution and established the Daffodil PMC! Congratulations! FYI - I have modified the Incubator’s podlings.xml file to reflect graduation! All The Best! Dave

Re: [VOTE] Contributors - Graduate Apache Daffodil (Incubating) to a top-level project

+1! Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 28, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote: > > One of the first steps in graduating from the Apache incubator to top level > is making sure we have consensus among our contributors that this makes > sense now. This is an initial first step. > >

Graduation

Hi - I think that it is time to consider graduation! Please look into http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#the_graduation_process The maturity model is helpful:

Re: Timezones in DFDL

There is a deeper problem with this example. It is a dateTime without a date and loses the nuance between when Los Angeles is GMT-7 and GMT-8. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 8, 2021, at 6:48 AM, Beckerle, Mike > wrote: > > I believe SL is correct. This is as expected. This is data >

Re: Keep compiled C code or throw it away?

However the community decides Apache open source releases must not include binary code. Binary convenience releases made by the community can be made in addition to the source release. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 5, 2020, at 2:26 PM, Beckerle, Mike > wrote: > > re: new TDMLDFDLProcessor

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.6.0 Release

Have Lola check when adding to the KEYS file. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 26, 2020, at 6:06 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Sounds good to have Lola do it when the time comes then. I think there > will be some slight changes to the release process since I believe only > PMC/PPMC members have

Re: Inconsistent CI results

> On Dec 18, 2019, at 1:57 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Unfortunately, this error happens from time to time, and we haven't been > able to track it down. Primarily because I don't think anyone has been > able to reliably reproduce it. I know I've never actually seen it > outside of the CI. >

Re: Podling Daffodil Report Reminder - December 2019

A reminder that the report is due on Wednesday. > On Nov 30, 2019, at 3:50 PM, jmcl...@apache.org wrote: > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare your quarterly

Re: design note on changes for DAFFODIL-2192 fix

Hi - We can make a request to Infra to allow attachments. Which mime types do we wish to allow? Regards, Dave > On Nov 6, 2019, at 6:08 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Sill missing. Maybe a mail server is removing it? > > On 11/6/19 8:32 AM, Beckerle, Mike wrote: >> Attached. >>

Re: Apache Daffodil

CC: Gautam since I’m not sure he is subscribed. Gautam - please subscribe to dev@daffodil.apache.org Regards, Dave > On Oct 15, 2019, at 4:33 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Hi Gautam! > > That sounds great! > > I would take a look at the Jira issues and see if any of those sound >

Re: [GENERATION] Code generation with Daffodil

t's think through this together in some design docs after Mike made > the initial setup. > >Julian > >From: Dave Fisher >Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 7:24:36 PM >To: dev@daffodil.apache.org >Subject: Re: [GENERATION] Code generation with Daffodil >

Re: [GENERATION] Code generation with Daffodil

Hi - First it was very cool to see the three of you interacting at Apachecon this week. It’s really great to see the conversation coming back to the list to share with everyone who is interested. Second, while flying back home from ACNA I thought of a simple use case I’d like to pursue that

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2019

Hi - The report is due tomorrow. Please take care. Regards, Dave > On Aug 30, 2019, at 6:40 PM, jmcl...@apache.org wrote: > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.4.0-rc1

t.txt. Would it be preferred that we additionally maintain a > .rat-excludes so that people can manually run the rat tool? No, that worked fine. Thank you! Regards, Dave > > On 7/3/19 12:59 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> +1 (binding) >> >> Signatures and hashes are all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.4.0-rc1

+1 (binding) Signatures and hashes are all correct. DISCLAIMER is correct NOTICE and LICENSE look good. Rat check is good. Please add a .rat-excludes file for the next release. This will make license checking easier. HTH, Dave > On Jul 3, 2019, at 7:50 AM, Adams, Joshua wrote: > > +1 > > I

Re: [DRAFT] Daffodil Podling Report - June 2019

+1. > On May 31, 2019, at 8:55 AM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > +1 > > Am 31.05.19, 16:34 schrieb "Beckerle, Mike" : > >+1. > > >From: Steve Lawrence >Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 8:12:58 AM >To: dev@daffodil.apache.org >Subject:

Re: Incubator report? Someone on it?

Hi - > On Mar 5, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > could have sworn I didn't see it this morning ... anyway ... I had to fix it > as it was completely messed up with some "your version" "their version" > markup ... now it's in line with the version in your email. >

New Mentor

Hi - Christofer Dutz has agreed to be a mentor to Daffodil. This is an advantage since he is now a user of the project. Welcome Christofer! Regards? Dave Sent from my iPhone

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi Craig, Sent from my iPhone On Feb 22, 2019, at 4:12 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> On Feb 19, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> (1) To be fixed on the next release: >>(a) Please do not include the KEYS file in the source r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi - (1) To be fixed on the next release: (a) Please do not include the KEYS file in the source release zip. Refer the users back to the location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/daffodil/KEYS

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi - Note below. > On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:21 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Hi all, > > The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed > release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1. > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > incubator

Fwd: Media/Analyst Training available for Apache Committers + PMC Members at ApacheCon/Montreal

Hi - If interested and you will be at Apachecon on Monday please consider attending. If so then reply-to pr...@apache.org Regards, Dave > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Sally Khudairi > Subject: Media/Analyst Training available for Apache Committers + PMC Members > at ApacheCon/Montreal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

xt release. >> >> Thanks, >> - Steve >> >> [1] https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps >> >> >> >> On 05/10/2018 07:42 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> Hi - >>> >>> +1 (bindi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice <https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice> > > > > On 05/10/2018 07:42 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Hi - >> >> +1 (binding) with a couple of areas for improvement. >> >> Source - hashes and signatur

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

Hi - +1 (binding) with a couple of areas for improvement. Source - hashes and signatures are good. I’m finally reviewing this release and in looking at the NOTICE and LICENSE there are many copyrights/required notices that are in the LICENSE instead of the NOTICE. Breaking these apart

Re: Subscribe Request

Hi - Please send an email to dev-subscr...@daffodil.apache.org Look for a reply and confirm. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 31, 2018, at 11:32 AM, Viola Goodacre​ > wrote: > > Please subscribe me to this group. > > Please let me know if there

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc1

created DAFFODIL-1900 for this, but have assigned it to our >> next release to investigate best how to handle this. >> >> Thanks, >> - Steve >> >> >> On 02/12/2018 03:46 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> Hi - >>> >>> A few qui

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc1

Hi - A few quick comments from a partial review of the Source and Binary release. (1) LICENSE & NOTICE. (a) The copyright portions that are in the LICENSE on the various licenses should be moved to the NOTICE. The LICENSE should still include which files are under the other licenses. (b) The

Re: GitBox is Enabled

Hi - It is good that you state that the release is from prior to Incubation. I think that you should update the button on the main page as well - “Get Daffodil 2.0.0 - not an Apache Release” John - what do you think? Regards, Dave > On Dec 4, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Steve Lawrence

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2017

A reminder that the podling report is due Wednesday, December 6. Regards, Dave > On Nov 29, 2017, at 5:49 PM, johndam...@apache.org wrote: > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of

Re: final review of pull request 5

Hi - > On Nov 16, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote: > > I have made a final set of review-driven changes to fix the typos and such > found in the last review. > > > If this patch is now acceptable, it should be squashed from 3 to 1 commit > before merging/rebase.

Re: November 2017 Podling Report

My mentor signoff is done. Good work! > On Nov 1, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Taylor Wise wrote: > > Podling report has been published to the wiki. > > > From: Steve Lawrence > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 4:29:46 PM > To:

Re: November 2017 Podling Report

Hi - Correct me if I am wrong, but don’t we have one of the SGAs? Regards, Dave > On Oct 30, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Looks good to me. +1 > > On 10/30/2017 11:59 AM, Taylor Wise wrote: >> Daffodil >> >> Apache Daffodil is an implementation of the

Re: First podling report?

Steve - Good initial report. I’ve done my Mentor sign off. John - thanks for doing the bootstrapping of Daffodil. I’ve been distracted this week by Harvey, my son lives in Houston… Regards, Dave > On Sep 1, 2017, at 8:38 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Ah, ok. Will do. >