Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-27 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Are you ok with @DeltaSpike, John? So we could continue with it? 2014-02-26 9:40 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko : > +1 Romain > > > 2014-02-24 21:11 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > > yes but until now everybody seems ok >> >> if we have multiple proposal we can see if we do another vote or if >> s

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-26 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 Romain 2014-02-24 21:11 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > yes but until now everybody seems ok > > if we have multiple proposal we can see if we do another vote or if > some change their vote, no? > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
yes but until now everybody seems ok if we have multiple proposal we can see if we do another vote or if some change their vote, no? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread John D. Ament
As per OP email, it's only a proposed value. On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > seems we agree on DeltaSpike, no? > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://g

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
seems we agree on DeltaSpike, no? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-24 17:24 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) bu

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread John D. Ament
I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) but to me this vote is not useful unless we actually know what the proposed new name is. On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > I'm inclined to -1 (veto) thi

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread John D. Ament
I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what the new qualifier is. On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum wrote: > +1 > > To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S) > > -C > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> +1 >> >> The Qualifier it

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread Cody Lerum
+1 To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S) -C On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > > The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand > wrote: > > +1 for @Deltaspike quali

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api. LieGrue, strub On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote: +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features. > > > >Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread Antoine Sabot-Durand
+1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features. Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rm

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko : > +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @Del

[VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi, based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?", I'd like to call a vote. The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is redudant: @Inject @Web ServletContext. We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future. 1) Should we repla

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

2014-02-24 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko : > Hi, > > based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?", > I'd like to call a vote. > > The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is > redudant: