Re: [VOTE] Require Java 8 for Apache Directory projects

+1 On Sat, Jan 5, 2019, 8:34 AM Shawn McKinney > > On Jan 5, 2019, at 1:06 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > > > > So I suggest we drop Java 7 as the base version for our project, and > switch to Java 8 (which is also EOLed, ftr). > > > > > > [ ] +1 : Only support Java 8 from now on > > > > [ ]

Re: Exception Running ApacheDS embedded

ma.ldif", "init-ldap.ldif"/*, "test-data.ldif"*/}) > public class FortressJUnitApachedsTest extends AbstractLdapTestUnit > > *** > > How does your aspect get hooked in? Sorry for the rudimentary question. > Is there a more complete example you can point me to? > > T

Re: Welcome to Lothar !

Welcome Lothar! On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 1:29 AM Kiran Ayyagari Welcome Lothar!, been a while since we last welcomed one :) > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:47 AM Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > >> I'm very please to have Lothar as a new Apache Directory project >> committer ! >> >> >> A warm welcome !

Re: Exception Running ApacheDS embedded

Not sure this helps much, but my team works around this for our integration test by using aop. Specifically: And this implementation /** * An aspect workaround for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1606; * >DIRSERVER-1606 * * @author LTHEISEN */ @Aspect public

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Kerby 2.0.0

+1 On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:15 AM Shawn McKinney wrote: > > > On Dec 11, 2018, at 5:49 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > wrote: > > > > This is a vote to release Apache Kerby 2.0.0. > > > > +1 > > Downloaded kerby-all-2.0.0-source-release.zip, validated its signature, > built on the OpenJDK Runtime

Re: LDAP API JNDI operations

I also agree. From your description it definitely sounds like cruft. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 4:38 AM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > > Le 22/10/2018 à 10:07, Radovan Semancik a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > Perfectly OK with me. I do not really see any point in mixing JNDI and > > Apache Directory API. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache DS 2.0.0.AM25 release

+1 However, test fail on Windows during attempts to delete test files. Not sure if that is much of a concern... [ERROR] Errors: [ERROR] JdbmIndexTest.cleanup:127 ▒ IO ERR_17010_UNABLE_DELETE_FILE Unable to delete f... [ERROR] JdbmRdnIndexTest.cleanup:128 ▒ IO ERR_17010_UNABLE_DELETE_FILE

Re: Partly done : [ApacheDS] Transaction support

il.com> wrote: > > > Le 26/02/2018 à 14:42, Lucas Theisen a écrit : > > This is excellent news. Great work on this, I can't wait to be able to > use > > an instance without worrying about corruption. Thank you for your work > on > > this! > > Thanks Luc

Re: Partly done : [ApacheDS] Transaction support

This is excellent news. Great work on this, I can't wait to be able to use an instance without worrying about corruption. Thank you for your work on this! On Feb 26, 2018 5:27 AM, "Emmanuel Lecharny" wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm done with the changes in the server : all the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Directory Build Tools 2.0.0

+1 On Oct 31, 2017 5:38 AM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" wrote: > +1. > > Colm. > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> Everything builds (the git repo, the tagged version, the zip file). >> >> >> N are correct. >> >>

Re: Git migration

Awesome work, thanks for doing this On Oct 18, 2017 5:15 PM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote: > Many thanks, Stefan ! > > > Le 18/10/2017 à 22:42, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : > > On 10/08/2017 09:44 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'll start with Git migration of the

Re: LDAP API svn migration : update

I had pretty good luck with git-svn in the past... I think it would be worth starting at the first 2.0.0 revision and dropping the rest... On Aug 20, 2017 5:32 PM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote: > Hi ! > > > I have started the migration on saturday afternoon (actually, on >

Re: Project versioning and OSGi

My 10 cents would be: just drop the suffix altogether. Let the patch just increment. I don't see a reason that we shouldn't just be 2.0.25. I have been using milestones in production for 7 years now... That said, I think there are many other conventions out there (.FINAL hibernate, .RELEASE

Re: [Vote] Switch to git for Apache LDAP API 2.0

+1, I did once use git-svn to convert a local copy a couple years back... It was super slow but worked eventually... On Aug 4, 2017 8:40 AM, "SHAWN E SMITH" wrote: +1 "The programmer … works only slightly removed from pure thought-stuff. He builds his castles in the air, from

Re: [Studio] Lambda and Java 8 requirement

I think switching to java 8 is the right thing to do. It's actually getting hard to find java 7 installs for Windows to build the code with On Jul 26, 2017 9:57 AM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote: > > > Le 26/07/2017 à 15:39, Shawn McKinney a écrit : > >> On Jul 26, 2017,

Re: [VOTE] Apache DS 2.0.0-M24 release

+1 On Jun 4, 2017 5:39 PM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote: > > > Le 04/06/2017 à 15:28, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : > > On 06/03/2017 09:31 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> - Nexus repository: > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachedirectory-1235/ > >

Re: failure while running mvn release:perform

Dam! Thank you for pushing through this. Great work. On Jun 1, 2017 7:12 PM, "Emmanuel Lecharny" wrote: > Ok, I figured it out : the SCM tag was set to 1.0.0-RC2 in the po.xml. I > have no idea why it wasn't set to trunk as it should have. > > In any case, I ran the

RE: [VOTE] - Release Apache Kerby 1.0.0 (take II)

+1 On May 12, 2017 1:28 AM, "Zeng, Frank" wrote: > Build successfully. > > Run kadmin, kinit, klist successfully. > > > > non-binding +1 from me. > > > > Regards, > > Frank > > > > *From:* Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org > ] > *Sent:*

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Kerby 1.0.0

+1 Fantastic work. Love seeing 1.0.0 get out the door! On May 5, 2017 10:05 AM, "Shawn McKinney" wrote: > +1 > > built from source, all tests passed on centos7 w/ java8. > > congrats on making it to the 1.0. > > Shawn > > > On May 5, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Li, Jiajia

Re: [vote] Gtant Brian Burch commit access to the apacheds-site

+1 On Apr 18, 2017 10:15 PM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote: > Hi guys, > > > we don't anymore have a real wiki, as the web site is stored in svn. I > would like to vote Biran Burch as committer on the apaceds-site branch > of the project > > > [ ] +1 Vote Brian in > > [ ] +/- O

Re: MIA for a bit...

Wow! Congratulations. On Mar 2, 2017 9:13 AM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote: > Hi ! > > > just for you to know, I may be MIA for a while, or at least way less > responsive : My wife just gave birth to our wonderful daughter today, > and I'm afraid it's going to be our priority

Re: ApacheDS/API/Mavibot/Fortress/Kerby/Escimo switch to Java 8 was Re: [Studio] Java 8

100% yes. +1 On Feb 13, 2017 3:59 AM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote: > > > Le 13/02/2017 à 09:49, Radovan Semancik a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > Yes, yes, yes. The sooner the better. > > > > However, it would be fair to have one java7 release where the java7 > > support is marked

Re: [Studio] Java 8

Definitely a good idea! +1 On Feb 11, 2017 7:21 PM, "Shawn McKinney" wrote: > > > On Feb 11, 2017, at 5:40 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > > > > None for me. I also do think we should switch to Java 8 for all the > > other subprojects. > > +1

[jira] [Closed] (DIRAPI-287) Documentation is wrong for connection pooling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen closed DIRAPI-287. Documentation updated. > Documentation is wrong for connection pool

[jira] [Commented] (DIRAPI-287) Documentation is wrong for connection pooling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15748794#comment-15748794 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRAPI-287: -- [~gdt], thanks for the reports... I just got done updating

[jira] [Resolved] (DIRAPI-287) Documentation is wrong for connection pooling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen resolved DIRAPI-287. -- Resolution: Fixed Published to staging: http://directory.staging.apache.org/api/user-guide/2.1

[jira] [Commented] (DIRAPI-287) Documentation is wrong for connection pooling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15746211#comment-15746211 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRAPI-287: -- [~elecharny], I updated the documentation, and published

[jira] [Assigned] (DIRAPI-287) Documentation is wrong for connection pooling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen reassigned DIRAPI-287: Assignee: lucas theisen > Documentation is wrong for connection pool

Re: Who's @apachecon in seville?

Sadly, my company isn't willing to sponsor my European vacation... Y'all enjoy! On Nov 5, 2016 10:26 AM, "Shawn McKinney" wrote: > Hello, > > The week after next will be apachecon in Seville. I know Emmanuel will be > there. Any others from our project planning on

RE: Sync up

Congratulations! Enjoy the new family member. On Sep 21, 2016 11:02 PM, "Chen, Sammi" wrote: > Congratulations to Jiajia! > > And thanks all for the support. > > -Original Message- > From: Gerard Gagliano [mailto:gera...@prodentity.com] > Sent: Wednesday,

RE: VOTE : add Steve Moyer, Chris Harm, Shawn Smith and Alex Haskell as Apache Directory project committers

+1 On Jul 1, 2016 6:19 PM, "Zheng, Kai" wrote: > I'm sorry, but why this go public? Any process change? > > +1 on the vote itself. I had worked with Steve before about Kerberos some > bit. > > Regards, > Kai > > -Original Message- > From: Emmanuel Lécharny

RE: Rethinking Mavibot...

My 10 cents... a pure Java solution is much better for many reasons: 1) easier to use, don't have to think about a different version per OS 2) easier to build (obviously) 3) easier to test, don't have to worry about inconsistency introduced by different builds of the native lib 4) ... That

Re: [Vote] Accept Scim contribution

I think it's a great idea. +1 On Jun 26, 2016 7:31 AM, "Stefan Seelmann" wrote: > +1 > > On 06/25/2016 01:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > > > two months ago, Shawn Smith wrote us to inform the Apache Directory > > project that he wanted to

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2155) Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a baseDn results in OPERATIONS_ERROR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15344962#comment-15344962 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2155: -- [~elecharny], is there a way to force a flush

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRSERVER-2155) Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a baseDn results in OPERATIONS_ERROR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15344953#comment-15344953 ] lucas theisen edited comment on DIRSERVER-2155 at 6/22/16 6:40 PM

[jira] [Updated] (DIRSERVER-2155) Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a baseDn results in OPERATIONS_ERROR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen updated DIRSERVER-2155: - Attachment: ads.zip Ok, I am able to reproduce consistently outside of a test

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2155) Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a baseDn results in OPERATIONS_ERROR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15344300#comment-15344300 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2155: -- I am still unable to reproduce within

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2155) Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a baseDn results in OPERATIONS_ERROR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15342958#comment-15342958 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2155: -- [~elecharny], are the unit tests still using JDBM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRSERVER-2155) Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a baseDn results in OPERATIONS_ERROR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15342765#comment-15342765 ] lucas theisen edited comment on DIRSERVER-2155 at 6/21/16 9:39 PM

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2155) Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a baseDn results in OPERATIONS_ERROR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15342765#comment-15342765 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2155: -- Attempting to write a unit test... but not sure

[jira] [Updated] (DIRSERVER-2155) Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a baseDn results in OPERATIONS_ERROR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen updated DIRSERVER-2155: - Description: If you have a context entry (perhaps dc=foo,dc=bar) that you delete

[jira] [Updated] (DIRSERVER-2155) Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a baseDn results in OPERATIONS_ERROR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen updated DIRSERVER-2155: - Summary: Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a baseDn

[jira] [Created] (DIRSERVER-2155) Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a base results in OPERATIONS_ERROR

lucas theisen created DIRSERVER-2155: Summary: Deleting a context entry then searching using the same value as a base results in OPERATIONS_ERROR Key: DIRSERVER-2155 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

[jira] [Updated] (DIRSERVER-2147) The ObjectClass index is using the ObjectClass name and not its OID

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen updated DIRSERVER-2147: - Summary: The ObjectClass index is using the ObjectClass name and not its OID

Re: [VOTE] Apache LDAP API 1.0.0-RC1 release

. This certainly makes the build feel rather flakey... Anyway, after duplicating settings in my user settings, the build was successful on my Windows 7 with Oracle JDK 1.8.0_92 +1 Lucas On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Stefan Seelmann <m...@stefan-seelmann.de> wrote: > On 06/16/2016 05:22

Re: [VOTE] Apache LDAP API 1.0.0-RC1 release

I checked out the tag, and attempted a build on Windows 7 Oracle JDK 1.8.0_92, but it resulted in errors on the OSGI tests: Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.56 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.directory.api.osgi.ApiUtilOsgiTest

Re: Scim library contribution

+1 On May 12, 2016 8:24 AM, "Radovan Semancik" wrote: > On 05/12/2016 04:57 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > >> Le 09/05/16 19:58, SHAWN E SMITH a écrit : >> >>> All, >>> >>> We renamed the project, the new repo is >>> https://github.com/PennState/SCIMple-Identity

Re: Travel to Vancouver and Bay Area

I'm in. Where you wanna meet? On May 11, 2016 8:35 AM, "Shawn McKinney" wrote: > I am onsite now. Lunch @ 1230p today? > > Shawn > > > On May 9, 2016, at 10:36 PM, Zheng, Kai wrote: > > > > Sorry I missed this today. Alex I will try to find you on

Re: Travel to Vancouver and Bay Area

I'm going to be at both apachecon and bigdata in Vancouver... Also willing to help anyone that needs it. When will you be speaking? On May 6, 2016 5:22 PM, "Zheng, Kai" wrote: > Hi, > > > > I will travel to Vancouver (speak about Apache Kerby) and then Bay Area in > the

[jira] [Created] (DIRSERVER-2125) More than one value has been provided for the single-valued attribute: pwdAccountLockedTime

lucas theisen created DIRSERVER-2125: Summary: More than one value has been provided for the single-valued attribute: pwdAccountLockedTime Key: DIRSERVER-2125 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: getLoopbackAddress() vs getLocalHost(), was: Bind Address of @CreateLdapServer/@CreateTransport

On Jan 8, 2016 3:26 PM, "Stefan Seelmann" wrote: > > On 12/27/2015 12:22 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Le 26/12/15 23:05, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : > >> Hi, > >> > >> in Studio integration tests we use our own ApacheDS test framwork with > >> @CreateLdapServer and

Re: [API] I'll most certainly start to cut a new release this week-end

Sounds good to me. +1 On Nov 20, 2015 5:22 AM, "Kiran Ayyagari" wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> we have injected some major fixes in the code recently, and I may start >> a release soon.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRSERVER-1954) Second startup of an embedded server fails (after an ungraceful shutdown of the first startup)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002167#comment-15002167 ] lucas theisen edited comment on DIRSERVER-1954 at 11/12/15 2:41 PM

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1954) Second startup of an embedded server fails (after an ungraceful shutdown of the first startup)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15002167#comment-15002167 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-1954: -- [~AndreasSiegel], I have modified the shutdown

Re: [VOTE] Apache LDAP API 1.0.0-M32 release

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Lucas Theisen <lucasthei...@pastdev.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Lucas Theisen <lucasthei...@pastdev.com> > wrote: > >> Yeah, thats my guess. Though what addresses would these tests be using? >> Do we actuall

Re: [VOTE] Apache LDAP API 1.0.0-M32 release

Le 15/10/15 18:22, Lucas Theisen a écrit : > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Kiran Ayyagari <kayyag...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Lucas Theisen < > lucasthei...@pastdev.com> > >> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache LDAP API 1.0.0-M32 release

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Lucas Theisen <lucasthei...@pastdev.com> wrote: > Yeah, thats my guess. Though what addresses would these tests be using? > Do we actually rely on a live external service in our unit test? I dont > know anything about that osgi pax test

Re: [VOTE] Apache LDAP API 1.0.0-M32 release

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Kiran Ayyagari <kayyag...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Lucas Theisen <lucasthei...@pastdev.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@apache.org> >&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache LDAP API 1.0.0-M32 release

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Stefan Seelmann <m...@stefan-seelmann.de> wrote: > On 10/15/2015 07:44 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > On 10/15/2015 07:26 PM, Lucas Theisen wrote: > >> > >> I tried both Oracle jdk1.8.0_60 and openjdk-1.7.0.71, so i don't th

Re: [VOTE] Apache LDAP API 1.0.0-M32 release

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Lucas Theisen <lucasthei...@pastdev.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Stefan Seelmann <m...@stefan-seelmann.de> > wrote: > >> On 10/15/2015 07:44 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> > On 10/15/2015 07:26 PM, Lucas The

Re: JDBM corruptions...

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> so we have clear case where the JDBM backend get corrupted, up to a >> point a full reimport of the data is

Re: [VOTE] Apache LDAP API 1.0.0-M32 release

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Also note that the following issues have been fixed (some of them a long > time ago) : > > DIRAPI-185 - Support underscore in AttributeNames (1.0.0-M23) > >

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14953551#comment-14953551 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-1974: -- Ok, I finally have a unit test to demonstrate

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14951272#comment-14951272 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-1974: -- Ok, still struggling to get a real unit test

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14951154#comment-14951154 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-1974: -- Turns out this unit test has a _BUG_... Back

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14950863#comment-14950863 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-1974: -- Just added an {{@Ingore}}'d unit test

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14950863#comment-14950863 ] lucas theisen edited comment on DIRSERVER-1974 at 10/9/15 5:55 PM

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14951024#comment-14951024 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-1974: -- Notes: {code:AciAuthorizationInterceptor (line

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14951024#comment-14951024 ] lucas theisen edited comment on DIRSERVER-1974 at 10/9/15 7:08 PM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14951024#comment-14951024 ] lucas theisen edited comment on DIRSERVER-1974 at 10/9/15 7:35 PM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14951024#comment-14951024 ] lucas theisen edited comment on DIRSERVER-1974 at 10/9/15 7:46 PM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14951024#comment-14951024 ] lucas theisen edited comment on DIRSERVER-1974 at 10/9/15 8:01 PM

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1974) Rename Operation Issue - ApacheDS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14947018#comment-14947018 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-1974: -- I believe I just ran into this issue

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2088) Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14704877#comment-14704877 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2088: -- [~akiran], a migration process

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2088) Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14699818#comment-14699818 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2088: -- {quote} The default value

[jira] [Created] (DIRSERVER-2089) AttributeType breaks the equals/hashCode override contract

lucas theisen created DIRSERVER-2089: Summary: AttributeType breaks the equals/hashCode override contract Key: DIRSERVER-2089 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2089 Project

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2089) AttributeType breaks the equals/hashCode override contract

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14697658#comment-14697658 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2089: -- I don't really understand

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2088) Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14697460#comment-14697460 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2088: -- [~akiran] or [~elecharny], I am

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2088) Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14697876#comment-14697876 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2088: -- {code:title=shared revision

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2088) Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14697897#comment-14697897 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2088: -- This is mostly a complete

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2088) Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14662653#comment-14662653 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2088: -- Committed an updated version

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2088) Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14662405#comment-14662405 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2088: -- A little deeper investigation

[jira] [Updated] (DIRSERVER-2088) Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen updated DIRSERVER-2088: - Attachment: oid_map.pl oid_map.json Attached a script and its output

Temporary Passwords

I have need for a temporary password feature that will allow a password reset by an admin to have a short term expiration. After a recent short conversation with Emmanuel, it sounds like this is going to be a rather large undertaking that will require some in depth knowledge of the

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2087) Not all policy state attributes get added to PWD_POLICY_STATE_ATTRIBUTE_TYPES

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14662218#comment-14662218 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2087: -- Whoops, missed

[jira] [Resolved] (DIRSERVER-2087) Not all policy state attributes get added to PWD_POLICY_STATE_ATTRIBUTE_TYPES

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen resolved DIRSERVER-2087. -- Resolution: Fixed Not all policy state attributes get added

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2088) Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14662201#comment-14662201 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2088: -- I will need at least 3 new OID's

[jira] [Resolved] (DIRSERVER-2080) Add a way to politely stop apacheds from apacheds.sh

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen resolved DIRSERVER-2080. -- Resolution: Fixed Add a way to politely stop apacheds from apacheds.sh

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2087) Not all policy state attributes get added to PWD_POLICY_STATE_ATTRIBUTE_TYPES

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14662261#comment-14662261 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2087: -- {code:title=Committed revision

[jira] [Created] (DIRSERVER-2088) Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors

lucas theisen created DIRSERVER-2088: Summary: Add the ability to specify additional fields that should be hashed by the hashing interceptors Key: DIRSERVER-2088 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

[jira] [Created] (DIRSERVER-2087) Not all policy state attributes get added to PWD_POLICY_STATE_ATTRIBUTE_TYPES

lucas theisen created DIRSERVER-2087: Summary: Not all policy state attributes get added to PWD_POLICY_STATE_ATTRIBUTE_TYPES Key: DIRSERVER-2087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2087

Re: [ApacheDS][PasswordPolicy] Some issues to fix in the code...

On Jul 25, 2015 9:20 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I'm currently reviewing Lucas' patches, which sounds good so far. But... I'm a bit annoyed by the existing code, and I think we have been sloppy for years. This is an accumulation of use cases, piling into the

Re: svn commit: r1692562 - in /directory/apacheds/trunk: interceptors/authn/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/authn/SimpleAuthenticator.java server-integ/src/test/java/org/apache/director

On Jul 25, 2015 9:26 AM, Kiran Ayyagari kayyag...@apache.org wrote: Lucas, On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:11 AM, lucasthei...@apache.org wrote: Author: lucastheisen Date: Fri Jul 24 18:11:38 2015 New Revision: 1692562 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1692562 Log: fixed leak of information when

Re: svn commit: r1692562 - in /directory/apacheds/trunk: interceptors/authn/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/authn/SimpleAuthenticator.java server-integ/src/test/java/org/apache/director

On Jul 25, 2015 10:01 AM, Kiran Ayyagari kayyag...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Lucas Theisen lucasthei...@pastdev.com wrote: On Jul 25, 2015 9:26 AM, Kiran Ayyagari kayyag...@apache.org wrote: Lucas, On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:11 AM, lucasthei...@apache.org

Eclipse MARS and antlr m2e

Has anybody else attempted to get eclipse MARS to work with the directory source. Specifically, the antlr-maven-plugin seems to be something m2e complains about: Plugin execution not covered by lifecycle configuration: org.codehaus.mojo:antlr-maven-plugin:2.2:generate (execution: default, phase:

Re: Eclipse MARS and antlr m2e

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Stefan Seelmann m...@stefan-seelmann.de wrote: On 07/24/2015 05:16 PM, Lucas Theisen wrote: Has anybody else attempted to get eclipse MARS to work with the directory source. Specifically, the antlr-maven-plugin seems to be something m2e complains about

[jira] [Created] (DIRSERVER-2084) Admin user should be exempt from the pwdHistory check

lucas theisen created DIRSERVER-2084: Summary: Admin user should be exempt from the pwdHistory check Key: DIRSERVER-2084 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2084 Project

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-2084) Admin user should be exempt from the pwdHistory check

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14639693#comment-14639693 ] lucas theisen commented on DIRSERVER-2084: -- {code} $ svn commit Sending

[jira] [Closed] (DIRSERVER-2084) Admin user should be exempt from the pwdHistory check

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] lucas theisen closed DIRSERVER-2084. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M21 Admin user should be exempt from

Security Issues

If i have a security concern, what is the best way to go about discussing it as a team? Should I just send out on this mailing list, or the security mailing list, or do we have a private virtual conference room? I am not sure others are concerned about this so I dont want to make a big deal

  1   2   3   >