I don't believe in the "wisdom of the masses", or at least I believe
to the same degree in the "stupidity of the masses". So even wikipedia
has an editorial framework set up to ensure validity and accuracy of
the information posted. In the way the community, that's ALL OF US ;-)
increasingly contr
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 20:52 +0200, Frank Peters wrote:
> >> For 2. especially for the online help I would suggest to
> >> - create a problem-oriented context sensitive help in dialogs.
> >> - make offerings beyond documentation: give access to user groups.
> >> - Create an expanding function like i
Andrew Jensen wrote:
>
>
> > You know this make a lot of sense. So maybe we could move Help to the
> > wiki and fix OOo buttons to go to the wiki for whatever is needed.
This
> > has the advantage to the community of being a resource like wikipedia
> > that can be maintained by the community, r
For 2. especially for the online help I would suggest to
- create a problem-oriented context sensitive help in dialogs.
- make offerings beyond documentation: give access to user groups.
- Create an expanding function like in Microsoft Office to allow
embedded information for beginners within inf
>
>
> > You know this make a lot of sense. So maybe we could move Help to the
> > wiki and fix OOo buttons to go to the wiki for whatever is needed. This
> > has the advantage to the community of being a resource like wikipedia
> > that can be maintained by the community, reduces the bloat from OO
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 12:32 -0400, Andrew Jensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > You know this make a lot of sense. So maybe we could move Help to the
> > wiki and fix OOo buttons to go to the wiki for whatever is needed. This
> > has the advantage to the community of being a resource like wikipedia
> > tha
Hi,
You know this make a lot of sense. So maybe we could move Help to the
wiki and fix OOo buttons to go to the wiki for whatever is needed. This
has the advantage to the community of being a resource like wikipedia
that can be maintained by the community, reduces the bloat from OOo
introduced
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 15:42 +0200, Martina Waller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A good contents organization means that the information in a
> documentation is structured according to the context of use. So, if you
> answer the question "Can you find the desired information quickly and in
> a reliable m
Scott Carr wrote:
Frank Peters wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to have the howtos on the wiki just
like the FAQs? I just stumbled upon a link to a howto in the
Calc FAQ.
Frank
User FAQ on the Wiki was a test to see how well it would work. Would
people actually help update it? How well could
Frank Peters wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to have the howtos on the wiki just
like the FAQs? I just stumbled upon a link to a howto in the
Calc FAQ.
Frank
User FAQ on the Wiki was a test to see how well it would work. Would
people actually help update it? How well could it be maintained?
Martina Waller wrote:
Hi all,
compared to competitors OpenOffice has a lot of printed/printable
documentation material. By printable documentation I mean all
documentation that is laid out for being read on printouts like books,
booklets and so on. For Office 2007 Microsoft has forgone the us
Martina Waller schrieb:
Hi all,
A good contents organization means that the information in a
documentation is structured according to the context of use. So, if
you answer the question "Can you find the desired information quickly
and in a reliable manner" with yes, the documentation has a g
Frank Peters wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to have the howtos on the wiki just
like the FAQs? I just stumbled upon a link to a howto in the
Calc FAQ.
It would certainly make them easier to maintain by everyone, and make
them more accessible to the community.
There are some tutorials up on th
Frank Peters wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to have the howtos on the wiki just
like the FAQs? I just stumbled upon a link to a howto in the
Calc FAQ.
+1
--Jean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
14 matches
Mail list logo
