20/10/2020 19:26, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > 20/10/2020 16:17, David Hunt:
> > > On 20/10/2020 3:01 PM, David Hunt wrote:
> > > > On 20/10/2020 8:35 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > >> 20/10/2020 04:49, Ruifeng Wang:
> > > >>> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > > 15/10/2020 14:04, Anatoly Burakov:
> > >
> 20/10/2020 16:17, David Hunt:
> > On 20/10/2020 3:01 PM, David Hunt wrote:
> > > On 20/10/2020 8:35 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >> 20/10/2020 04:49, Ruifeng Wang:
> > >>> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > 15/10/2020 14:04, Anatoly Burakov:
> > > +/**
> > > + * This function is not su
20/10/2020 16:17, David Hunt:
> On 20/10/2020 3:01 PM, David Hunt wrote:
> > On 20/10/2020 8:35 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 20/10/2020 04:49, Ruifeng Wang:
> >>> From: Thomas Monjalon
> 15/10/2020 14:04, Anatoly Burakov:
> > +/**
> > + * This function is not supported on ARM.
> >>
On 20/10/2020 3:01 PM, David Hunt wrote:
On 20/10/2020 8:35 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
20/10/2020 04:49, Ruifeng Wang:
From: Thomas Monjalon
15/10/2020 14:04, Anatoly Burakov:
+/**
+ * This function is not supported on ARM.
+ */
+static inline void
+rte_power_monitor(const volatile void *
On 20/10/2020 8:35 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
20/10/2020 04:49, Ruifeng Wang:
From: Thomas Monjalon
15/10/2020 14:04, Anatoly Burakov:
+/**
+ * This function is not supported on ARM.
+ */
+static inline void
+rte_power_monitor(const volatile void *p, const uint64_t
expected_value,
+
20/10/2020 04:49, Ruifeng Wang:
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > 15/10/2020 14:04, Anatoly Burakov:
> > > +/**
> > > + * This function is not supported on ARM.
> > > + */
> > > +static inline void
> > > +rte_power_monitor(const volatile void *p, const uint64_t
> > expected_value,
> > > +
.h...@intel.com;
> jerinjac...@gmail.com; timothy.mcdan...@intel.com; gage.e...@intel.com;
> chris.macnam...@intel.com; Anatoly Burakov ;
> david.march...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/10] eal: add power management
> intrinsics
>
> 15/10/2020 14:04, Anatoly Burakov:
&g
15/10/2020 14:04, Anatoly Burakov:
> +/**
> + * This function is not supported on ARM.
> + */
> +static inline void
> +rte_power_monitor(const volatile void *p, const uint64_t expected_value,
> + const uint64_t value_mask, const uint64_t tsc_timestamp,
> + const uint8_t
gt; jerinjac...@gmail.com; tho...@monjalon.net;
> timothy.mcdan...@intel.com; gage.e...@intel.com;
> chris.macnam...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/10] eal: add power management
> intrinsics
>
> On 10/15/2020 1:04 PM, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> > From: Lia
> Add two new power management intrinsics, and provide an implementation
> in eal/x86 based on UMONITOR/UMWAIT instructions. The instructions
> are implemented as raw byte opcodes because there is not yet widespread
> compiler support for these instructions.
>
> The power management instructions
On 10/15/2020 1:04 PM, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
From: Liang Ma
Add two new power management intrinsics, and provide an implementation
in eal/x86 based on UMONITOR/UMWAIT instructions. The instructions
are implemented as raw byte opcodes because there is not yet widespread
compiler support for the
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:34 PM Anatoly Burakov
wrote:
>
> From: Liang Ma
>
> Add two new power management intrinsics, and provide an implementation
> in eal/x86 based on UMONITOR/UMWAIT instructions. The instructions
> are implemented as raw byte opcodes because there is not yet widespread
> com
From: Liang Ma
Add two new power management intrinsics, and provide an implementation
in eal/x86 based on UMONITOR/UMWAIT instructions. The instructions
are implemented as raw byte opcodes because there is not yet widespread
compiler support for these instructions.
The power management instructi
13 matches
Mail list logo
