Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Excellent. Thanx. On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I added some notes to the usage doc, both describing the missing > profiles and the configuration property changes... > > -> richard > > > Alin Dreghiciu wrote: >> >> I guess it would be perfect. >>

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Ok, I added some notes to the usage doc, both describing the missing profiles and the configuration property changes... -> richard Alin Dreghiciu wrote: I guess it would be perfect. Thanx. On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alin, I could add a sec

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

I guess it would be perfect. Thanx. On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alin, > > I could add a section to the usage document describing how the old > properties have become the new properties, would that work? > > -> richard > > Alin Dreghiciu wrote: >> >>

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Alin, I could add a section to the usage document describing how the old properties have become the new properties, would that work? -> richard Alin Dreghiciu wrote: Thanx for the link Richard. I used the new property for start level. I still think that an migration path or something as what

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Thanx for the link Richard. I used the new property for start level. I still think that an migration path or something as what is changed between the "legacy" how you named and 1.4.0 will be a real help for people switching to the new version. On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAI

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-806) changing the internal configuration of the archive plugin doesn't seem to be possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12645305#action_12645305 ] Stuart McCulloch commented on FELIX-806: FYI we do already read some settings from t

[jira] Created: (FELIX-806) changing the internal configuration of the archive plugin doesn't seem to be possible

changing the internal configuration of the archive plugin doesn't seem to be possible - Key: FELIX-806 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-806 Project: F

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Alin Dreghiciu wrote: If that's the case, as Stuart mention, can someone provide a list of what properties are no longer supported or deprecated and which are the new ones? http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-usage-documentation.html -> richard Thanx, On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:04

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Stuart McCulloch wrote: 2008/11/6 Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Yep, Clement is correct. We have introduced a new property in 1.3.0 development version (1.4.0 should be officially released soon). These new changes align with a standard framework API under consideration by the OSGi A

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

If that's the case, as Stuart mention, can someone provide a list of what properties are no longer supported or deprecated and which are the new ones? Thanx, On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/6 Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Yep, Cleme

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

2008/11/6 Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Yep, Clement is correct. > > We have introduced a new property in 1.3.0 development version (1.4.0 > should be officially released soon). These new changes align with a standard > framework API under consideration by the OSGi Alliance. > > Felix will

[jira] Closed: (FELIX-799) ServiceReferenceImpl does not support the compareTo() method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stuart McCulloch closed FELIX-799. -- Tested and it works great - closing issue. > ServiceReferenceImpl does not support the compareTo()

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Alin Dreghiciu wrote: Hi, Do you have an rough date when 1.4.0 is out? So, I know how to plan support in Pax Runner. We are shooting for calling the vote tomorrow, but if that slips we will probably wait until Monday to avoid calling a vote just before the weekend. -> richard Thanx. O

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Hi, Do you have an rough date when 1.4.0 is out? So, I know how to plan support in Pax Runner. Thanx. On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep, Clement is correct. > > We have introduced a new property in 1.3.0 development version (1.4.0 should > be offici

Re: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Yep, Clement is correct. We have introduced a new property in 1.3.0 development version (1.4.0 should be officially released soon). These new changes align with a standard framework API under consideration by the OSGi Alliance. Felix will now set a reasonable default value for org.osgi.frame

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-756) Allow URLStreamHandler services to override built-in handlers.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12645233#action_12645233 ] Karl Pauls commented on FELIX-756: -- Don't bother with the system property. Starting with re

RE: Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Hi, You can set the "org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra=" property in the conf.properties file. For example: org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra=foo;version=1.0.0, \ bar;version=1.1.0 Those packages will be appended to the default list contained in Felix. So, if you launch the 'packag

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-805) Instance not created if the factory becomes valid later

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Clement Escoffier resolved FELIX-805. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed at revision: 711559. Instances targeting non valid factories are

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-803) iPOJO Core schema needs to be fixed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12645211#action_12645211 ] Clement Escoffier commented on FELIX-803: - Fixed at revision: 711559. The 'interface

[jira] Work started: (FELIX-803) iPOJO Core schema needs to be fixed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on FELIX-803 started by Clement Escoffier. > iPOJO Core schema needs to be fixed > --- > > Key: FELIX-803 >

[jira] Created: (FELIX-805) Instance not created if the factory becomes valid later

Instance not created if the factory becomes valid later --- Key: FELIX-805 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-805 Project: Felix Issue Type: Bug Components: iPOJO

Felix 1.3.0 Changes

Hei, i have just built the 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT and i see there are some changes from the 1.2.1 (obviously). I have a question about how i declare the packages the framework should export. Are they defined as before, or is there a new key in the config.proprties? Thank you - atle prange

[jira] Assigned: (FELIX-803) iPOJO Core schema needs to be fixed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Clement Escoffier reassigned FELIX-803: --- Assignee: Clement Escoffier > iPOJO Core schema needs to be fixed > --

Re: Contributing parts of the ServiceRegistry Hooks (RFC 126) implementation into Felix

Hello David, On Nov 4, 2008, at 17:33 , David Bosschaert wrote: In the context of the Apache CXF project a number of people have been involved in implementing the Distribution Software part of Distributed OSGi (RFC 119 [1]). [...] If Felix is interested in taking this implementation, it migh