Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

+1 On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 4:06 AM Christian Schneider wrote: > In the past we discussed a few times about moving felix to git. > > A while ago we did this step for Aries and it was simpler than anticipated. > The problem in Aries were the remaining small bundles and subprojects that > were relea

Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

+1 Le sam. 2 nov. 2019 à 10:06, Christian Schneider a écrit : > In the past we discussed a few times about moving felix to git. > > A while ago we did this step for Aries and it was simpler than anticipated. > The problem in Aries were the remaining small bundles and subprojects that > were rele

Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

+1 (non binding) - very good idea! regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 4 lis 2019 o 17:18 David Jencks napisał(a): > I’m not exactly active currently, but +1 > > David Jencks > > > On Nov 2, 2019, at 5:41 AM, Christian Schneider > wrote: > > > > I propose we first move the whole repo and then extra

Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

I’m not exactly active currently, but +1 David Jencks > On Nov 2, 2019, at 5:41 AM, Christian Schneider > wrote: > > I propose we first move the whole repo and then extract projects if people > like this. > It is much easier to do the extraction based on a git project. > > Christian > > Am S

Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

Thanks you for bringing this up again. I wanted to do this for a while now. I'm for moving to git (as one project). Let us wait a little in case somebody has strong objections but if not, I'll call a vote on it soon. regards, Karl On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 10:06 AM Christian Schneider wrote: > >

Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

+1 -Georg On 2019-11-02 13:41, Christian Schneider wrote: I propose we first move the whole repo and then extract projects if people like this. It is much easier to do the extraction based on a git project. Christian Am Sa., 2. Nov. 2019 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < j...@nanth

Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

+1 Ray On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, 09:09 Jean-Baptiste Onofré, wrote: > It sounds like a plan ;) > > +1 > > Regards > JB > > On 02/11/2019 13:41, Christian Schneider wrote: > > I propose we first move the whole repo and then extract projects if > people > > like this. > > It is much easier to do the e

Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

It sounds like a plan ;) +1 Regards JB On 02/11/2019 13:41, Christian Schneider wrote: > I propose we first move the whole repo and then extract projects if people > like this. > It is much easier to do the extraction based on a git project. > > Christian > > Am Sa., 2. Nov. 2019 um 13:21 Uhr

Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

I propose we first move the whole repo and then extract projects if people like this. It is much easier to do the extraction based on a git project. Christian Am Sa., 2. Nov. 2019 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < j...@nanthrax.net>: > +1 > > The question is: do we keep an unique repos

Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

+1 The question is: do we keep an unique repository for all felix projects or we create one git repo per project. I would prefer to have one dedicated git repo per project (felix-framework, felix-configadmin, etc). Regards JB On 02/11/2019 10:06, Christian Schneider wrote: > In the past we disc

Re: [Discuss] Another try.. move to git

I think it would be very nice to move Felix source code to git! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 02/11/2019 à 10:06, Christian Schneider a écrit : > In the past we discussed a few times about moving felix to git. > > A while ago we did this step for Aries and it was simpler than anticipate

[Discuss] Another try.. move to git

In the past we discussed a few times about moving felix to git. A while ago we did this step for Aries and it was simpler than anticipated. The problem in Aries were the remaining small bundles and subprojects that were released by bundle. The larger sub projects were already moved out to separate