OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-03 Thread richard jackson
After I finish off learning what I need to know about felix I want to tackle writing a OSGi HTTP Service bundle. But I have a few questions about what can be included in this bundle if I want to contribute it to Felix: 1) Can it contain out side code? In particular I'm thinking about Grizzly ( htt

Re: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-03 Thread Rob Walker
nt from my Treo(r) smartphone -Original Message- From: "richard jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, Sep 4, 2008 6:08 am Subject: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question To: "dev@felix.apache.org" Reply-To: "dev@felix.apache.org" After I finish off lea

Re: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-04 Thread Richard S. Hall
richard jackson wrote: After I finish off learning what I need to know about felix I want to tackle writing a OSGi HTTP Service bundle. But I have a few questions about what can be included in this bundle if I want to contribute it to Felix: 1) Can it contain out side code? In particular I'm thi

Re: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-04 Thread Richard S. Hall
p.s. One thing I should point out, since you reference FELIX-538, is that this issue is for a "really lightweight" HTTP Service. So, all of the stuff you are discussing (i.e., iPOJO, Grizzly, Servlet 2.5, plus extensions) does not really fit into this definition; however, that doesn't mean that

Re: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-04 Thread Jean-Cédric Desrochers
richard jackson wrote: > After I finish off learning what I need to know about felix I want to tackle > writing a OSGi HTTP Service bundle. But I have a few questions about what > can be included in this bundle if I want to contribute it to Felix: > > 1) Can it contain out side code? In particular

Re: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-04 Thread richard jackson
See below On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > richard jackson wrote: > >> After I finish off learning what I need to know about felix I want to >> tackle >> writing a OSGi HTTP Service bundle. But I have a few questions about what >> can be included in this

Re: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-04 Thread richard jackson
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Jean-Cédric Desrochers < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > richard jackson wrote: > > After I finish off learning what I need to know about felix I want to > tackle > > writing a OSGi HTTP Service bundle. But I have a few questions about what > > can be included in this

Re: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-04 Thread richard jackson
I guess I read it more as we don't really need all the extra stuff that a normal Servlet container has (class loading, war file deployments ect...). Basicly only support bundles and bundles only. But then again I also want filters and such as well. But anyways what I'm more thinking about is a real

Re: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-04 Thread Richard S. Hall
richard jackson wrote: I guess I read it more as we don't really need all the extra stuff that a normal Servlet container has (class loading, war file deployments ect...). Basicly only support bundles and bundles only. But then again I also want filters and such as well. But anyways what I'm more

Re: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > richard jackson wrote: >> >> I guess I read it more as we don't really need all the extra stuff that a >> normal Servlet container has (class loading, war file deployments ect...). >> Basicly only support bundles and bundl

Re: OSGi HTTP Service (FELIX-538) Question

2008-09-05 Thread richard jackson
All I can say is Cool. A Really great idea. Now I just need to check the code out and play with it :) I use tomcat all the time now but I really want to replace it with OSGi and that really looks promising. And it looks like tomcat-light may already be working :) And in reality that would be all we